Milky Way Dark Matter Study

Hey folks, Neffon free here. You know, people who defend evolution theory and this big bang idea and say it's all naturalism and creation is false and blah, blah, blah, materialism is true. You know, they invented dark matter a long time ago to plug the holes in there early, big bang theories and they've been applying it as a fixer, a filler to all the holes in all their secular theories ever since, you know, to try to argue a way from creation. But it's just gets more funny, all the time. I've said many times before, evolutionists provide all the evidence in the world necessary to discredit evolution theory or you have to do is read between the lines and accept what they say. But here's something interesting. Serious bloated aren't matter theories, says new study, the science daily, one of the world's most popular science websites, definitely a godless secular source. Mysterious lack of dark matter and suns neighborhood. In other words, you see, they say that the universe, the solar system in our universe should be chalked full of dark matter because there's not enough matter for gravity to act the way it does with some of the bodies in space, especially galaxies, spiral galaxies. So they're saying, here they say, the most accurate study so far of the motions of the stars in the Milky Way has found no evidence for dark matter in a large volume around the sun. According to widely health theories, the solar neighborhood was expected to be filled with dark matter in a mysterious, invisible substance that can only be detected by the gravitational force it exerts. But a new study by team of astronomers in Chile has found that these theories do not fit the observable facts. That science, right? What is observable testable repeatable? That science. Fantasies about what could a should of would have, if you don't find any evidence for it, is not science. You see, could of what a should have only applies to a hypothesis. If you don't find the evidence for the could of what a should have, you discard it and start a new hypothesis to form a theory. That's how science is supposed to work. But not these people. No, evolutionists don't work with science. They're anti-science. We say it's there and that's what fixes the problem and that's why it is. That science to these people. You see, evolutionism, you know, if you're not scientific, they're anti-science. It says here, this may mean that attempts to directly detect dark matter particles on earth are likely to be unsuccessful. What they've been trying for a long time to get labs around the earth, trying to find it and it can't. See? It's a state here. The amount of mass that we derive matches very well with what we see, stars dust and gas, in the region around the sun. In other words, the matter that we see is what seems to be there. Nothing more. See, when it's all this imaginary dark matter, they say it's just, but this leaves no room for the extra material dark matter that we were expecting. Our calculations show that it should have been very clearly in our measurements, but it's just not there. You see, dark matter doesn't even exist, folks. It's something they invented to try to fill the whole and their theories which do not work. Big Bang Theory, it does not work. The accretion disc theory for the formation of the solar system does not work. The theory for how it's Saturn and Uranus and all the planets came into being do not work. See, and dark matter is one of their excuses. Here it is. Milky Way Study makes dark matter theory, murky. It germany April 18th. A study of stars around the Milky Way found no evidence for dark matter in a large warmer on the sun. A blow to the current cosmological theory scientists say. Now, the next time, folks, really. The next time you hear an evil card say to you, an evolution defender say, well, dark matter is, man, this was doing a huge thing, nothing about science. Tell them, dark matter is not science. It's anti science. It's invented. It's fabricated that just like certain particles, certain kinds of matter, they invented to make their big bang theory work. If you don't even have, it's not even plausible if you don't have the imaginary kinds of matter that existed early in this supposed big bang. They invented all kinds of things. It's like punctuated equilibrium with false record. Well, if false all's going to be shown in transition, that's because it happens so fast, they've been leaving the record behind and it eroded away. See, the absence of evidence to them is evidence that it happened to quickly, for us to find the evidence when the false record, if it were, if evolution were true, would be rife with transitional forms. It would be so many of them, it would be billions times billions. We should have a false record littered with them. It should be full of them. It shouldn't be any problem demonstrating by laying one false on each other, of a morphological change, one kind of creature into a new one. See? And by back to this, dark matter is mystery deepens. Science daily, October 17, 2011. Like all galaxies, our Milky Way is home to strange substance called dark matter is invisible. It's strange presence. Only through gravitational pull, blah, blah, blah, blah, after completing this study, we know far less about dark matter than we did before. That's what I say. Said the lead author, Matt Walker, hobble fellow at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Astrophysics. Our measurements contradict the basic prediction about the structure of cold, dark matter and dwarf galaxies. Unless or until theories can modify that prediction, cold, dark matter is inconsistent with the observable data. See, science is what? Observable testable and repeatable, right? So what was dark matter ever scientific? And it never was. There's something they invented to plug all the holes in their godless, empty creation theories see God created the heavens and years. And science is bearing it out. But always has been. Here's another. Nearby dark matter free zone poses a cosmic conundrum, April 2012. Invisible dark matter is supposed to make up 80% of their universes mass, but a new study of nearby stars and galaxies suggest our patch of the cosmos could be totally free of the stuff. Totally free. This claim is that the volume of dark matter in this volume there is no dark matter. University of Chile. See? Where's the dark matter that fills the godless theories? There are anti-creation theories. It's not there. Folks, listen to me. I've said it me in some times. Okay, not me. I've said it many times. Dark matter is just something they invented to fill the holes in their theories. It doesn't even exist. Dark matter mystery. Why are 400 stars moving? As though there's nothing there. See? This is another recent discovery. The theory of dark matter took decades to hold in astronomy. To take hold in astronomy and it's no wonder, no it didn't. That's a lie. They've been putting it for a long time. Didn't take no atheist secular astronomy theory or biological theory takes decades to take hold. That's a lie. They push it into science right away because it fills a hole. That's not true. They got this idea from the secular camp and they swallowed it. It's pretty rough to wrap and remind around the notion that some mysterious invisible substance pervades cosmos. Yeah, kind of. And even tougher it says to accept that it outweighs ordinary matter by a factor of 6 to 1 at least. Yeah, I agree. If evidence eventually trumped in credibility though and all right. Sure. Yeah, sure. And by the 1980s, the vast majority of the scientists were on board with the idea. Not even it might seem. Of course it is. That's dark matter for you. That's their godless theories. Not as it might seem as right. Just say here, our calculations show okay. See, they took the motion of 400 stars in the broadly defined neighborhood of the sign concluded that the Milky Way they're all moving in consistent with conventional ideas about dark matter. Our calculations show that the evidence that dark matter should have, this is the same study written up in a different way. It's just not there. Look at this. It's not there. But it's just not there. In other words, the motion of these 400 stars should be under the influence of dark matter. But it's not. Why? Because dark matter doesn't exist. That's why. Another. Dark fluid. Dark matter in dark energy may be two faces of this same coin. Oh, that's another invention of theirs. Not only is there dark matter. There's dark energy. It gets more funny all the time. Simply the dark side of the universe. Yeah, the dark side. Welcome to the dark side. Luke Skywalker. Luke welcome to the dark side. Luke. Luke. Luke. I am your Antichrist. Four percent of the universe is made of unnometerial 96 percent is traditionally labeled in two sectors, dark matter and dark energy. They claim 96 percent of the universe is made of this stuff. Why? Because their theories don't work without the extra gravitational pull or forces. And so they invent dark matter. And this is one reason why a strong spiral galaxies. They spend 10 times too fast on the outside. The inside spans in correlation to the outside, which means the outside spending so fast. It's your literally rip itself apart and should never have actually formed. How do they fix this by claiming dark matter surrounds them? Right. Dark matter in dark energy. See, Zwicky noticed in 1933 that these galaxies spend that way. The inside, like a phonograph record, the inside spends at the same speed with the outside. They go around together. Instead of a vortex where the outside should be spending far less slower and the inside should declose where you get to the inside faster it should be spinning. See, it's not they don't operate like a vortex. They look like one. They don't operate one like one. There's no explanation for this. So they invent dark matter. See? Unbelievable. So the next time, keep a copy of these links, folks. These articles to this. And the next time an evolutionist tells you dark matter explains things. They're, you know, why galaxy, why the accretion disk or explains the, you know, was flat instead of a sphere or why the galaxies or spiral galaxies don't rip apart and how they could have formed and why they operate the way they do. Next time any of they say dark matter, this blah, blah, blah, blah, tell them nonsense. Ask them where's the evidence, the physical evidence for dark matter. If they tell you gravitational ants in gravitational ants in, gravitational ants in, because we can point a laser or light beam towards a galaxy and it bends. It hits the end. That means, but the dark matter is pointed in. No, that means the gravity of the galaxy is pulling it bending the light. Not your imaginary dark matter. But that's what they'll tell you, see? They'll say, well, gravitational ants in, see? No, there's no evidence of that. You point a light in the space and if you see it bent, that doesn't mean dark matter there. It means it's bending and you don't know why. Okay. It could be a planetary out there. They have to size of our son that doesn't exhibit a, uh, exhibit a, put out light or reflect light, a non-reflective, dark body in, out there. It could be massive and we just don't see it because it's non-reflective, right? And it might even be separate from other bodies. Do you know there are hundreds and hundreds of Venus sized planets, rogue planets floating around in our universe? The free floating, without it they have no solar system, they're not part of anything, they're just floating off. They contradict their, their secular theories about the universe itself. You see, how do we know you're not pointing towards something like that? They don't know, so it's not scientific to say dark matter in gravitational antsing. Because the light bends, doesn't mean dark matter's there. It means we don't know what's bending it, now we need to find out. But see how evolutionists work, anti science, because the light bends, it dark matter. That's what did it, you can ask, well how do you know, well because dark matter, well how do you know, but because dark matter. Okay, but how do you know what's dark matter, but because dark matter. See, that's not answer. It's not science, it's anti science folks. Uniformitarianism, evolutionism, the big bang theory, the theories of all of the, the creation desk, all of the secular theories to explain away the physical world around us. They don't know what are the, and they invent things, they're anti science. These are these, these materialistic views, these godmas theories are anti science. They do more harm to science, they suck a ton of money for research that provides no knowledge or benefit to mankind. It's a huge waste of money. Okay, so anyway, make fun of an evolutionist next time you talk about photography.