Weird-Colored UFOs and the Search for Extraterrestrial Life

And this is the fact of the matter we were really not sure after John Fluer, whether or not there were critters, living critters out there somewhere. How do they fire flies? From time. The stuff of life is absolutely everywhere. Comments, the outer solar system, the cold, dark near vacuum between the stars are all loaded with the complex organic molecules, the very sort that you would want to have for the origin of life. We see a forming planetary systems everywhere. We know that the evolutionary process is nothing unique to the Earth. The vast majority of scientists and technologists continue to regard all this as complete nonsense. They may acknowledge or the strange phenomena exists, but they think that it is not an immor worthy of a high priority study. Now, then it was twenty-three years ago. When the national academy of sciences and the University of Colorado released the Condon report, and I'm already now to remember. So, never has the situation been so clearly polarized. Never has it been harder to do good research. As a scientist, I've come to the conclusion that a genuine UFO phenomenon exists. It is physical, and it is unexplained. I think it's not one of the serious inquiries of the subject, because it would disturb the rational universe. And many advocates of UFO logic are equally opposed to a serious inquiry, because it might show the UFO phenomenon as far more complex. Stimulating, awesome, and ultimately important and mysterious, then the specific limited version they are presenting today. As Dr. Heinach himself said in October 1976, quote, I have come to support less and less the idea that UFOs are not some bold spacecraft from other worlds. There are just too many things going against this theory. I think we must begin to reexamine the evidence. We must begin to look closer to home. Yet, Alan died without being able to convince his colleagues in astronomy to take a closer look at the data. In recent correspondence, the vocabulary of great contemporary cosmologists, now remember the US National Academy of Sciences. What to me that he was still unconvinced, he felt that UFO reports simply showed what peculiar things human consciousness could do. In so saying he was only expressing the common scientific consensus on the topic. The truth is that the technological community in general is indifferent to the UFO question. In my observations, official science is not uniformly set against the scared of speculation. The real debate about the phenomenon doesn't have to do with whether or not the phenomenon exists. What scientist's question is the ability of modern science to deal with it. In my conversations with my colleagues in technology, that's what comes across. They agree that there is something out there. That's not that's very poorly explained or not explained. In many of those cases, in the surprising number of those cases, if they could come forward with their observations, you would find that these people have themselves observed in a number of things. In private conversations with Professor Condon in 1967, I heard him express a similar view. He told me that a study of UFOs was a waste of time, not because the problem didn't exist, but because he thought it was outside the realm of science. I disagree with this view, because as a French astronomer once said, no problem in scientific or unscientific by nature, but only by the way in which it is approached. The challenge here is to construct a rational, testable way to approach a UFO phenomenon. These unidentified flying objects that appear to display unique characteristics, such as their speed, their rapid maneuvering and so on, must be studied in the interest of mankind.