UFO Disclosure Revelations: The 2012 Connection

I've heard that the least pyramids very strongly spoken about are said to be mice's fallen or a well-trained center. How could I be? Prices fall as a well-trained center. Theologist and said that the moon would have these flowing. From three directions, I owe it the same speed for the pyramids of Elisium to have been formed naturally. And then there are the glass-like tunnels, which are at least 60 feet in diameter with exposed sections running a thousand feet long. The tunnels are amazing. Or maybe looking at nothing less than the ultimate proof of an ancient civilization that used these tunnels for water, perhaps even for transportation. Before I turn the microphone over to Brian O'Leary, I have something I want to show you over to your left. The pace on Mars is back. This sculpture was made by a artist Salvador Rizilio, based on the original biking photograph of the face on Mars, which shows a giant snake snake snake's figure with human features in sight on it. And now the new photograph is in the face. I'm really going to make a sit-up and bake notice. It's an entirely new face on Mars, and this time it appears to be the face of a woman wearing a crown. OK, and now I would like to introduce Dr. Brian O'Leary. Thank you, Michael. I normally don't read statements, but I think I'm going to start reading this one. Science is going to a major revolution. There's no question about it. We are living in exciting times, in spite of what government agencies might tell you. More than probably in no area has there been more misunderstanding than in the area of search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Never anybody embarks on this search. There seems to be great controversy for the greatness understand. And yet more than two decades responsible research by investigators outside of NASA on this object so-called pace on Mars have revealed very strong evidence. I'd get proof that this object and other objects nearby were artificially constructed. And yet NASA and its contractors have shown no interest in these objects and have often skated the research. History is full of the capital of the Nile and suppression of new ideas and establishing the Galileo for purpose we know by further so-called. In each case the conventional wisdom was reversed by the investigations of courageous outside researchers who have risked their careers in some times their lives to seek the truth rather than to be politically correct. My colleague Dr. Tom Van Flantern is one example. I have known Dr. Van Flantern for nearly 40 years and can attest to the thoroughness and integrity of his research. During the 1960s we were a graduate students together at Georgetown University. When on-verse PhD at Yale I went on for my PhD at the University of California in Berkeley. Then I was appointed by NASA to be the first astronaut to Mars. Unfortunately the Mars program has canceled at that point. Tom and I each pursued mainstream careers in astronomy research, publishing dozens and dozens of peer-reviewed papers in our fields until the 1980s when we independently began to address promising but unsupported topics such as Mars anomalies. In 1976 the Mars biking orbiter image to mile long mesa that resembles a human-based during straight-up into space. The spacecraft also image other objects of interest in surrounding areas. This began a 25-long period of scientifically inappropriate actions, including the initial denial of a second corroborating image of the Sydonia phase. The use of improper optical algorithms and filters on the high-resolution phase image for, for example, the initial Mars global severe photograph. Holding back or delaying the release of images from the public and providing premature negative interpretations of their possible artificiality. Also we have seen in NASA a lack of cooperation with qualified outside investigators, including campaigns to discredit the inquiry. The refusal by mainstream scientific journals to even consider and review papers let alone publish them. And NASA's failure to re-image the face and surroundings under proper circumstances when occasions rose. Collectively these activities violate NASA's own charter as an open-sadity in agency, accountable to the public. The main casualty in all of this has been the truth. How could this have happened? Perhaps NASA and its contractors and other agencies are following a secret policy to deny evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. Perzoons to a 1961 broken institution report recommending non-disclosure to the public. Regardless, sufficient evidence has been gathered to warn a public outcry to get to the truth of the matter. Through the years Dr. Van Planner and Society for Monetary, SETI Research and I have published significant scientific evidence for artificial structures on Mars. In the presentation you're about to hear Dr. Van Planner will be showing you some provocative images from the ongoing Mars to the severe missions. Some of the images should not be regarded as the definitive science of the evidence. But rather as further indicators of what could turn out to be one of the most significant discoveries of our time. The public needs to know about the evidence being presented from the depths of the extraordinary collision between the old and the paradigm. No important question has been more maligned or more controlled than whether or not we're alone in the universe. It's time to get to the bottom of the story. We're here to have Dr. Van Planner's very talented people. How about an addition to that though? We talked so much about the Roswell findings, what's there, what wasn't there, the secret cease surrounding that. But from your studies of astrophysics, from being an astronaut, from going to the moon, from studying the pictures of the galaxy, tell me something that you've seen or that you've studied that you just feel in your gut, there is something else out there. Well, that you're saying it right, it's an intuitive feeling at looking at the heavens and the modern pictures of the Hubble telescope from the Hubble telescope and seeing the complexities and the beauty and recognizing the universe is much more complex and magnificent than our earlier pictures, our earlier understanding, whatever let us imagine. And so back to the right, that's the intuitive aspect of it. But the real question here that we've been addressing is have we been visited? Are we, since we are now as face-faring civilization, having only gone to our own moon, but have our visitors, our the aliens, have they come to us and all the evidence and yes? So what is it that you want to see the Obama administration release? Specifically, what do you think is there that we need to see? Well, the other nations, and this has been a global phenomenon, other nations in just a recent history, the Belgian nation, the French, the Brazilian, the Mexican, the Argentine, all of their files have been opened up, and there's no reason in the world why the US files, the leading nation in the world in this period, should have been read and said that opening ours too, except for my son interest groups. So, Andrew, let me ask you, I mean, for all the stories that have leaked over all the years, I mean, and there's always somebody somewhere that's going to leak something, and if there was really something there, don't you think by now somebody would have said something? Well, it has. People have been saying it all along, but for example, just the explanations of the Rosalinds and the change every few years and the new story comes out. If it were really that simple, if it weren't what it really was, you wouldn't need all of these very stories coming out. And so the attempt to cover this up and to disguise the issue and create misinformation and disinformation is very well recording, and the documentation from very fine researchers like Dr. Robert Wood and his son Ryan, who've investigated all of the early documents all point to the same story. Hey, we're not alone here, we've been busy. Well, Edgar Mitchell, I'll tell you what. We did fascinating all of us. We'll stay on and please let us know if you're able to dig a little deeper and bring us a scoop. Edgar Mitchell, great to see you. Thank you. Okay, you heard from Man who's been, we're only a handful of earthlings of Ben before, does his argument add any gravity to the issue? Tell us if you think the president should open up the mysterious UFO files and why our email. See you at newsurmaceedin.com. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We're going to read your responses in just a bit. We should go boldly where Man has not gone before. Fly by the comments, visit asteroids, visit the moon of Mars. There's a monolith. There are a very unusual structure on this little potato-shaped object that goes around Mars once in seven hours. When people find out about that, they're going to say, who put that there? Who put that there? Well, the universe. Put it there. If you choose, God put it there. You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You You We can visit other people with their Habitations. We can keep track. If there's something very important to be developed from the moon. I'm not sure what it is right now. And I sure think we should identify what it is for America to make such gross expenditures Again for human habitation on the moon. We can help. We can join with, together, we can explore the moon and develop the moon. We should go boldly where man has not gone before. Fly by the commits, visit asteroids, visit the moon of Mars. There's a monolith. There are very unusual structure on this little potato-shaped object that goes around Mars once in seven hours. When people find out about that, they're going to say, who put that there? Who put that there? Well.