Robert Mugabe: Historical Context & Legacy

For several years, I've been very interested in Zimbabwe, because Robert Mugabbe is pretty much the only African leader trying to totally dislodge white power in Africa. A little history lesson on Zimbabwe writes supremacy came to Zimbabwe starting with the genocidal lunatic Cecil Roads. The country was then renamed Rodisha, as usual white power attempting to erase a people by trying to rename them, since names link us to a specific time, place and culture. About the only thing that remains of Cecil Roads today is the so-called Rhodes Scholarship, many presidents and so-called white liberals have gotten it and are proud of it. The Zimbabwe and people did to Cecil Roads were all Africans too. They fought him until they won. But as so often happened after the Europeans lost power, they may have lost the war, but they won the peace. In Uganda, the British installed idiom means to be their puppet and protect their interests, which he did until he eventually became more willful than they were willing to allow. He tossed out the Asians and denounced the whites. They've claimed, with hardly any evidence, that he murdered thousands, hundreds of thousands, possibly millions. Of course, not a single word of this is true, but it's been repeated so often that people have bought into it. In Kenya, the Brits had no problem letting their hand picked puppet, Daniel Moy run things for over 20 years, and when the people eventually barred him from running again, he passed the torch or rather the knife to get another white stooge. Moray Kabaki. I don't think I have to tell you that South Africa's first black president was himself hand picked by the very whites whom his so-called truth commission has arbitrarily decided to exempt from any and all prosecutions. Anyway, Robert Mugabe was a good little white boy for a while, doing as he was told, securing and protecting white interests, he killed anyone who threatened his rule, and the Brits had no problem with it. After all, he didn't touch the land they had stolen, nor was he interfering with their stealing some Bobway's minerals, they loved Mugabe back then. But they're singing a different song now to hear the good white folks tell the story today, they sound like the police chief in the movie Casa Blanca, simply shot to learn that Mugabe had committed ghastly acts of violence against people back when they were giving him praise and adulation. Then I said, once actually, you believe he should be stripped of his nighted, I was horrified to find out that Mugabe had a nighted. I was afraid of him as a fellow Mugabe. I became foreign secretary without knowing that. Just on the nighted, Deb was heard, you were foreign secretary when he was given the nighted, I think. I'd have fixed an art. I really did a government when he was given the nighted. 94, what were you in 94? I was found associate. That was what he was given his nighted. But not very. Well, I was pleased to tackle him, he's here, not land me and not think by the British come, but I'm who else can give him the nighted except the British government? I don't, I simply do not know the answer to that. But what I did was get raised was that he was known when he got that nighted, whoever gave it to him, the British government or, I don't come to him and they have the government to give it to him. It was known already by then that he had massacred 20,000 people in that Abiluland, with North Korean trained armies in the ages. He had to see other given them. He hosted a Commonwealth Conference and could see it might have been in recognition of that. At the Queen month there, he was, I don't say, in good stand. He was a member of the Commonwealth alongside a lot of other people who we disapprove of. Of course you did. That's right. Robert Mugabi is actually Sir, Robert Mugabi, a knight of the British Empire. So, if Mugabi was a loyal one to be right boy, what changed? Under immense pressure from the African people he eventually became dissatisfied with being the white's lackey and decided to start taking back his people's land. This is where the British and the Americans declared war on him. The main cheerleaders against Mugabi has been the BBC. The British news outlet through whom the world has gotten its news about Zimbabwe for the last 30 years. They've accused him of everything but the Jewish Holocaust. Until Mugabi started reclaiming the land, that same BBC wrote nothing but glowing reports about him. For over 25 years. But the instant he started taking back the land, they had nothing but scored. In order to make it clear how evil Mugabi is, the white media decided to manufacture a hero in their little drama, they chose the MDC, the so-called movement for democratic change. The MDC was started in the late 1990s, back when Mugabi was still carrying water for the whites. The MDC didn't want whites out of power. They just wanted the money the whites had been giving to Mugabi to be given to them instead. The whites had first ignored the MDC and the MDC couldn't get their candidates elected dog catcher. They had no money and no media support. But when Mugabi started reclaiming the land for his people, all of a sudden the white started pumping cash into the MDC like crazy. The BBC decided these guys would be presented to the world as heroes fighting against an evil dictator. Of course they never tell anyone that the only thing the MDC is fighting for is for whites to keep the land they've stolen. No economic policy, no agricultural policy, no educational policies. The MDC's entire political platform can be summed up in seven words. Don't touch the land the white stole. Mugabi is called a racist, but the BBC never once has shown the world just who the men who run the MDC are, men like Ian K. A domestic terrorist charged with numerous counts of inciting violence. This guy is a member of the MDC and is now a symbolic and parliamentarian. In a country where whites are only 1% of the population, how is it possible that this guy can be a member of the parliament? Because he's one of the racist white thugs who was running the place during colonialism. He's used the money he stole to engineer a place for himself in the government of a country he shouldn't even be in. It's like Morgan Charanghi, our only puppets. It's bastards like K, who actually run the MDC. Charanghi does what they say. But back to the whites PR war against Mugabi last year. Realizing they couldn't pull in a rock and chin up a quickie excuse to invade because everyone would recognize it as recolonization. The whites in London decided to take out sanctions instead. When that didn't work, they asked the US to do the same. The president at that time, D'Obbia, gladly obliged. Pay attention because what comes next is crucially important. The US's very first move was to freeze credit against Symbabwe. I'm sure you've heard the term credit freeze the last 10 months. It's a credit freeze by the world banks that has brought the US to its needs to destroy the housing market and caused a global economic catastrophe. I highlight that so you can understand how important credit is to a national economy, even the US's. The US still has working farms, working factories and a service sector, but credit alone has caused nearly 10% unemployment in only a few months. This is what the Brits and Americans did to a country with nowhere near the financial resilience of the United States. This was when Zimbabwe's economic trouble started, not during the land reclamation. Neither the BBC nor any other part of the white media has told the story, but you're about to hear it now. They instead talk about Zimbabwe's economic roofs and they always talk about the whites being forced off the land they stole. Check it out for yourself. Whenever Zimbabwe is mentioned, without exception, the article or news broadcast will talk about supersonic inflation and then immediately talk about the poor, down-trodden whites who the mean or Mugabwe is pushing off the land. This is done in order to create a false association in your mind between Zimbabwe's economic problems and whites being evicted from the land they stole. Even those Zimbabwe's problems are not at all related to the land reclamation program, rather the freezing of credit, financial assistance, and assets carried out by the US on the behalf of Britain. They also keep talking about the farms. Like the whites are just farmer Joe working to feed the Africans, let's get one thing straight. The Africans were no better off food-wise before Mugabwe started taking the land back. The main people who benefited from the whites so-called farmers in Zimbabwe were the whites in South Africa. The Africans have never had full bellies off of whites owning the farmland. But that's the way propaganda works. They want you to think that reclaimed the land has caused massive starving.