The Sun's Effect on Earth: A Comprehensive Analysis

Hey folks, this video is opinionated and then it contains my personal view on something I strongly believe is contributing if not outright causing many of the things that we're seeing these days. I'll also discuss opinions I've formed about other relevant topics. There will be scholarly articles used here that I am limited by license as to how much I can show, even though they may be pay for them. But I believe the limited educational use of the material that I will show falls squarely within the fair use provisions of the US copyright act. I'm going to start with the Sun's effect on the Earth. Now this paper right here gives us a good jumping off point, but we can't just rely on this. As you can see here, it was received and they even received a revised manuscript, but it was never accepted. And there's a good reason for that. They only use 13 years of data. Now they use 22,000 quakes, I know that sounds like a lot. But when you're trying to tie solar activity as a triggering mechanism to earthquakes, you got to use more than just a little over one solar cycle. Now they did it on a day-to-day basis and they did manage to get a fairly strong correlation when correlating seismic activity to Sun's spot number, radio flux, KP and next things like that. But this is just a starting off point in terms of their conclusions. What is important about this article is that it puts out some really good theories that are at least sound fundamentally about how this triggering mechanism would work. Not as the cause of an earthquake, but just how it could release the pressure. Now this, you've seen this before. This is what happens when lightning sends up with their waves and it's captured by a magnetic field line. Well, same thing happens if it's coming from the other direction, from a coronal hole, a stream or from a CME. It's going to get gathered up by the magnetic field lines and inducted into the earth. That can heat up the rocks and you know, have other kind of electromagnetic effects. The next building block of this that was accepted at Italy took a look at 90 years of data. Look at VEI level 4 and 3 volcanic eruptions and magnitude 7.5 quakes in higher. And took that and correlated it to Waldmeyer's Sun's spot number. Another correlation they found is modest kind of a recorrelation. But the existence of that recorrelation has a very very high confidence interval, 99.99% certainty. So there just about certain that there is a small correlation. And this builds on the idea that you know, they don't cause the, you know, these earthquakes to happen at are nowhere. But sometimes they can act as a triggering mechanism. And now what's interesting about this is they found that, well, 7.5 earthquakes have a weak correlation to high solar activity and by that, I don't necessarily mean on solar maximum. But I'm talking about that days, Waldmeyer's Sun's spot number and the days, you know, write around that. So geomagnetic activity pretty much around that because it is directly tied to the Sun's spot number as we see over time. But they find that volcanic eruptions have a more, more moderate correlation to inactivity on the Sun. So we decided, hey, well, they're only looking at VEI4 Let's look at some of the stronger ones. So you can see over there on the right that is every explosion VEI5 or higher since 1800, the list on top is the ones that follow the trend from the article talking about, you know, being at low solar activity and the ones on the bottom are the ones that are, you know, go against the article that happened near solar maximum and high solar activity. I find it very interesting that one, I don't know where they get that correlation because it's just about even there, maybe it's slightly skewed towards the top. But what's interesting is that top is mostly 5's, there's 1's 6 and that's actually unconfirmed. But down on the bottom, that's where all the bigger quakes are and those happened at solar maximum. So I find that very interesting moving on. Well, this article is quite convincing. They look at 70 solar cycles averaging about 11 years, each so more than 700 years of solar data. And once again, they had a very strong confidence of a modest correlation. The correlation value is 0.47. So it's a moderate correlation and the P value was 0.01, which they very high confidence. They tied this in with coronal whole streams and CMEs, an interestingly enough, the increase in frequency did not happen on the day of impact. But in addition to looking at how this energy is inducted into the earth and heating the rocks and having other magnetic effects, they propose a dual method of action where this also affects the atmosphere as well. You know, the electric currents going through attract the water molecules, the heating certainly has an effect on the pressure systems over vast areas. And they really correlate it very well. The earthquake frequencies that they're seeing, they correlate it to these atmospheric shifts that occur during geomagnetic activity. So that's very, very interesting. And this isn't really unprecedented whatsoever. The method of action for how this would occur is actually well known. And there's a website you can go to called climatelogic.com where you can get a lot of free information. You don't have to pay for any of it. That really discusses how this works and how they're actually expecting with increased solar activity this cycle, you know, to 2012, 2013, they expect to see, you know, a lot more of these atmospheric shifts, you know, with the western winds, the western winds, what they look for with this. They really expect to see an uptick in the kinds of activity that we've been looking for over the next year and a half to two years. And if you think about it that makes sense, how much pressure must the atmosphere put forth down onto the earth or under the sea? What if this changes sea level? Is that could have drastic effects on how much pressure is on the tectonic plates? It makes a lot of sense. If you want to see an example of some scientists trying to tie an earthquake directly to a geomagnetic event using these kinds of things, this is a pretty good paper right here. Essentially, we have to come back to the purpose, which is what is happening here. In 1962, when they noticed that the water on the coast of Japan heated up and cooled down basically with the solar cycle, you know, relatively, they confirmed that with a worldwide study of the same thing water temperatures from 1961 to 2006, however in 2007 there was a sharp increase that pretty much persisted. Despite the fact that we had one of the longest solar minimums of very low solar activity. So this is very interesting folks and this has just happened in the last few years. Something else is that has just happened since then. You know, this is the all the VEI4 level eruptions since the year 2000. And we should get about one a year, maybe a little less. But since 2008 we got 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. You know, there's a couple actually that aren't on here. The Indonesia volcano probably should be labeled four here from this as well. So we have volcanic activity higher than normal and we should expect that during solar minimum. Folks, which are looking at here is the predicted value for the critical frequencies in the F1 layer from 1999. This is what they predict it should look like. Now as we go towards solar maximum, 2002 you can see it increased there and you're going to see it come back down through solar minimum. And then it's going to rise back up here at the end because we're approaching solar maximum again. Folks, this is what we're really seeing. This is back in 1999, you can see it does go up a little bit and then we have solar maximum and it goes back down. Now you saw how much it exceeded expectations and has an exceeding expectations. But folks, look what is starting to happen in 2007. This would be the third thing that we are noticing happen. And this is very strange and this is a juicing up an over ionization of our F1 layer. And we're real quick for those who don't know what we're looking at in the critical frequencies. Technically that is the highest frequency wave that can be skipped or bounced off of that level of the ionosphere based on how juice up it is. And basically what that translates to here is a serious juicing up of the ionosphere much beyond what they would expect. And folks, I will go as far as to say that this magnetic ribbon that was only recently discovered by I-Bax now granted this could have been here for millions of years and we just never saw it. But it if it has only been here recently then that is undoubtedly contributing to these changes that we're seeing. What this ribbon is is pressure, just really strong pressure on the heliosphere. And what the heliosphere is if you don't know, think of like the Sun's magnetosphere protecting us from cosmic rays from the rest of the galaxy. And other things like that, it acts as our solar system shield. Well folks, apparently the pressure being enacted on the heliosphere is so strong that it is redirecting the solar wind. These charged particles back into the solar system. Now we already know that energetic neutral atoms always bombard the solar system because they are neutral and therefore unaffected by the electromagnetic that heliosphere. But in addition to that, we also have charged particles being redirected back into the inner system. There's a pretty good study done on this. The link will be below as will a bunch of others. I really take a look at this one. There is definitely something that is causing the solar wind to be redirected back into the inner solar system and just think about the implications that could have, you know, what that could do to the planets. It might seem far fetched to you, but this right here is an image of these energetic ions impacting titans atmosphere. Now you can just imagine what that would do to its upper layers and you know, imagine if that was Earth heating up our ionosphere and any energy that gets in, you know, electrostatically discharged up there is going to be, as you can imagine, gathered on the magnetic field lines and inducted back into the Earth. You know, it would be inducted into the other planets as well. Jupiter, Venus, and the Sun too, certainly the Sun's not immune from this. Don't forget that 18 months before solar maximum, the Sun had a average monthly Sun spot mean that exceeded the experts predictions for maximum activity for the entire cycle. We're going to go higher. It makes me think we shouldn't be doing certain experiments heating the D region and I know that there are a lot of you who disagree with my theories on this, but come on folks, just look at what radio waves can do to matter if done properly. All matter has its own resonant frequency, use your head. Now folks, there's a lot of information in the information box below, a lot of links, a lot of sources. Just like when the experts tell you it will miss, you should look twice. I fully expect you guys to vet my opinions. I almost hesitate to give them because I know there are some who will just take me at my word for it, not do their own research. I really don't like that, but my opinions are these. Solar activity, there is definitely a correlation, a moderate one, between high solar activity and earthquakes, and also between low solar activity and at least moderate volcanic eruptions. These seem to hold true at least until the past few years where we've seen an uptick in volcanic activity. Two of the five strongest earthquakes ever recorded happened the last two years. There's a lot going on folks, a lot to keep our eyes on. If this magnetic ribbon is something new, it is almost certainly an essential piece of the puzzle. Welcome to this journey folks, should be a good ride. Be safe.