The Dogon Code Part 4

One of the things I find that came to understand about the Egyptian language is that there are two different functions happening with words in the language that reveal more truth to the person's trying to understand it. The first function is what you can call hominems words and sound alike and what a lot of you can just look at as puns that only a portion of the full meaning of what you're looking for is in any of those given words. You might see it as an aspect of a god or an aspect of an idea. But you need to look at the other words that are pronounced the same way or the truth. The word for play is one that a reason I thought play was just a placeholder for war. The actual word they wanted to use and you had to go to the words that sounded like played fine from some of the spindles. So it was a form from play, man, it was really form from some of the spindles. As it turns out, play actually has a scientific role in the process or may have a scientific role in the process of the creation of life. It's a substance that our substance that act as a catalyst for the formation of the building lots of life. And so it wasn't just a flat-out placeholder, it was really an important piece of the concept. Sometimes there are multiple words pronounced in different ways for the same concept. Like the Egyptian word thread, there are multiple words pronounced in different ways that mean thread. If you look at all of the spellings, I would like to express these words. You come up with clues that need to be put together to get the full picture of what they're talking about when they say thread. And on one level that's string theory, components of string theory and diagrams from string theory. On the other level, it's components of reproduction and genetics. Two main cults centers are two main religious centers in Egypt, hermopolis and heliopolis. Heliopolis, the symbolism is all connected to structure of matter. Hermopolis is all connected to reproduction and genetics. So when you're talking about certain some frogs, that immediately makes me think that we're on the human reproduction side, the genetic reproduction side rather than the structure of matter side. But since the same symbolism is used to represent both, when you come down the genetic reproduction side, you start out with the self-emerging god. The god who emerged from the water to chaos is the first cell, the first cell of the first living cell, which then produces the perfect pair, which represents mitosis, the splitting of an animal, or about the cell. You get into talking about the surface of the frogs and now you're into the details of what's going on with myosis, which is sexual reproduction, which is more complicated subject. And then you start getting into either pairs of males and pairs of females being formed or four females being formed, which is the description of this special reproductive process called myosis, which results in four males as and four females cells, each with half the number of chromosomes that you find in an unusual cell. They then combine to form the zygote, which is what then develops into the human being. So in each of these cultures, part of the duality of the with the religion is set up is because one, I think, is to what it do, the structure of matter line, and one is to what it did, the genetic reproduction. In that final line, the final storyline, the acquisition of the skills of civilization, the symbols are not being used symbolically, they're being used as the monic devices, they're being used as ways of helping people remember what it is, they're talking about. And they evolved into the grave and images that were later forbidden at the time of the Judaism and Christianity came out. The forbidding of those great images is what I've seen kind of remind the structure of the serpent religion, which is quite a felt part after the time of the Exodus region. From what I can see, in many different cultures around the world, Serpents are originally knowledgeable teachers, even see it in the story of Adam and Eve, the transgression of the serpent name was providing knowledge. And you see the same thing repeated again, again, in culture from culture to culture, the serpent is a provider of knowledge, who later becomes vilified, and is either said to be forced to leave or is said to choose to leave, that particular point of time. But it also may be discussing the fact that whoever these teachers were came out of a group of teachers, a larger group of teachers, and they were not supposed to provide a list with certain sets of information that they did, and was discovered that they had, then the others of the group came very upset and tried to make sure that that number first. The Femble's book is something that's celebrated today. He drew the conclusion that the concept of the building claim that they came from the Star Serious Festival, in fact literally and physically the ancient astronauts or brought humanity to the earth in one form or another. This is what we're talking about in the interior of this one and one of the possibilities. In fact, there's the Douglass and Serious Warship, also a major factor in the Douglass' knowledge. Scranton found that interesting, but his interest was in the cosmology. From my point of view, part of what created the tangled knot of information and the rubber temples, the rubber temples, both made some statements that scientists came back and then refuted. The next question is, what's your left where it is? A candle of information that depending on the point of view, look at it, you might want to believe you might not want to believe it. Part of what contributed to that was the choice to carry his description to the teachers rather than just limiting it to what was taught. Before it's a stay out of that tangled knot in order not to have my observations lumped into that knot. I've deliberately chosen not to talk about teachers and I've been trying in all aspects of the book not to go beyond what I could actually demonstrate in life in the morning. When you get to the question of the teachers, right now we aren't in a position of the demonstrate in the black. We can't say for sure it was somebody off planet. We can't say for sure it was somebody from Atlantis. We can't say for sure much about it. We can't even say for sure that this culture came out of that culture. There have been many attempts to say that it all started in India or it all started in Mesopotamia or it all started in China or someplace else. Right now there are no clear genealogies that don't result in contradictions that say it started here and moved to there. That all leads me to believe that what we're looking at may actually be the liberal separate presentations of a single lesson plan that tailored to the regional requirements of each group. So you end up with a serpent symbol that is a cobra in Egypt but is a rattlesnake in North America. Are you end up with a horned animal symbol that is a ram and one culture and a goat and another culture. All the same underlying symbol but presented in a way that your average person in a particular region would walk out the door of their hut and see a tangible example of the different of them. So I'm free of force to teach you of the religion and if someone put a gun to my head right now and said what happened I would say someone with knowledge arrived around 3400 BC from wherever and deliberately presented a lesson plan. These different regions South America, Egypt, Africa, India, China.