The Dogon Code: Ancient Knowledge

I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. I'm going to report you to the next one. An important new addition to ease of ecology has come my way very recently. A book called Hidden Manings by a man called Laird Scratten who is a specialist and computer language. Cross-check so many different directions. As a programmer, I've got to be able to determine myself when I'm right about something like I'm not. I have to make that determination in a way that a company can stay kids business. There are nothing to cater here from a company who doesn't have to enrich and say, this is right, this is right, this is right. I'm at the point where we have to build with it. I'm certainly going to find different ways. The day job is to make incompatible languages compatible with each other. I get that's a programming technique that a lot of times we're going to a client account. They'll have two or three copies of a program. They'll written over time. Started out to be the same program. I'm expected to figure out what the differences are between these three versions of say of a program. I developed programming tools that we compare line by line, what the differences were, and highlight the differences. I could say, okay, anything that's not highlighted had to be part of the original program. Anything of this highlighted was either out of the one program or from the other, actually. I used that kind of approach initially to try to sort out differences between EGIP and Sumer and EGIP and the Doga. And that sort of put me in the ballpark of what had to be part of the original. Me and what had to be evolved later. When scrapped and compared, the latest developments in the pastoral physics and astronomy between the Doga and the Egyptian account, you found that they were not a similar, and they were identical. The languages describe these processes, and were different. But the processes themselves were virtually identical. Superstring theory and quantum mechanics are written as indelibly into the Doga Egyptian schemes, as they are, into modern books on these subjects. And so scrapped, took a stilver there, and they stayed with Paul K. and the number of other. Well known scientists and popularisers of the advanced, minor means easy science. And sure enough, not only were the stories the same, but the diagrams with the same book as the diagrams that are used by modern cosmologists to illustrate in the electron cloud, are effectively the same diagrams that the Doga Egyptian used to illustrate that particular stage of creation within their own cosmological schemes. So, we've got a sense now that we've got a sense of significance and scrapped and it's worth it. He is showing that he's showing in a way that's practically in controversial, that the ancients had our science. The most tale in the status of lost arms, from the lost world, and having the valious mother in Egypt, he didn't achieve it. Originally, as a training program, I was always under the guidance of another more experienced program. So I had help and I could turn to what I was trying to solve for a problem. I noticed over time that I was being given less and less information and I expected to do more and more with it. And I started to joke with myself that at some point I was going to be given nothing and I expected to do everything with it. And surprisingly that was just the qualification I needed to be able to research a book like, where there was really no one who could give me the guidance that I really needed to be able to sort out what they symbols of man. I had to book it out for myself. I'm sitting here with layered scrapped, author of hidden meanings, the study of the founding symbols of civilization. Laird has contributed a book of tremendous importance in my view to the growing library of books that demonstrate the existence of an extremely sophisticated, highly scientific view of the cosmos that existed as far back as we can trace history and probably much further than that. Laird's looks stands out among many others in part because of its originality. And in part because it is unlike a lot of those other books extremely accessible, but he does very briefly to show that the doggum remote tribe in West Africa have a cosmology and their symbols and the story of how the universe and humanity within it are created. Matches the ancient Egyptian story very, very closely and perhaps even more remarkable in this is where the book becomes controversial in its way and explosive at the same time. When both of these stories are compared to the latest wrinkles in contemporary physics and cosmology, superstring theory and quantum mechanics on physics, all of the sudden the stories of the same, and the symbols of the same. I think what was Robert Temples, the serious mystery, I think that's where a lot of people started, that's what brought the doggum into the consciousness of modern society. I read his book, I was very interested in that. I was really interested in his references in the back of the book, I started following some of those references to try to read more about the tribe and more about just subject matter. From there, my programming background was started kicking in, well, it's back up a little bit. I converted Judaism when I married my wife recent. So I had some knowledge of symbols of Judaism. I've had some recreational read background in Egypt. So I could see resemblance between the symbols of the doggum had and that were an ancient Egypt and the were in Judaism and all that said to me, let's talk this stuff as a play.