Electrician Matt Presti discusses the physics of electricity, explaining wave cycles and critiquing reductionist science. He suggests a sense-based approach.
Transcript
And that, you know, myself being an electrician, I've always been interested in way in the economics, and I started on basic physics and studying the physics of the movement of so-called electrons banging in each other to lose a current forward, which is nonsense, but what actually found out was that this explained the wave cycle much better than the textbooks I had looked at, which is that from the zero stillness, a wave arises to its caragy or to its crest and then it returns to a state of rest. And that is basically the 180 above and 180 below zero, which is a two dimensional representation, but if you can think three dimensions, then you can picture the sphere and the tube and the wave cycles, as well as try to frame it, as being a much more effective and understood and the applicable description of actual wave mechanics of electricity itself, which is spiral and dynamic. When you speak about this being a sense-based science, go into that a little bit more. What does that mean? Well, what it means is that they do experiments and they plot those, the results of those experiments on graphs, and then all the dots aren't the same, so they have to create a curve between all of them. And that's a form of reductionism it reduces their real values to something that we can basically create a formula for. And that's the way mathematics is based based on these, these reductionistic observations, which average out the differences in their experiments and then get a formula to work with. But that's not reality, this is a reduced version of what they're seeing. It's a simplified version. This is like, for instance, you see sine waves on an oscilloscope. That's a form of reductionism because it's a two dimensional display of what's happening in three dimensions. And as you see a sine wave, what you're really seeing is helices that are in three dimensions. So you're seeing spirals which then compressed into two dimensions. So there's this mentality throughout science that does that. It wants to, they use this thing called rest, something in their equations, which doesn't exist in the universe. I mean, everything's in dynamic motion, everything's moving in enormous velocity. So it's another form of reductionism by reducing things to rest and then calculating from that rest. So there's, there's enormous amount of problems with the way the science receives things because they've reduced it to like a childlike simplicity of the way that we're seeing. And the simplicity of two dimensions when we live in a three dimensional universe. It all sounds to me like humanity at some point was on the path of understanding this true science, a sense-based science. That's why we have so many geniuses throughout ancient history. But nowadays when we think about technology, I guess, knowing-based science, it always seems to lead us into chaos. Yeah, that's because of social engineering. Like I said earlier, this is known as the pushing of the nuclear theory, the atom, for example. It was a protest that against at its time is when we made it out of stupid. And the same thing with the big bang. You know, I mean, you think to then, they've been from the very inception by democracy protested, but the people that fund this planet, if push those forward as being the truth. And there's no truth to the nuclear atom, the truth to big bang. They're complete frauds and myths. It all supports explosion science too, explosion-based technologies. Exactly. What makes the money and keeps the war machine going? Exactly. And it's all based on linear physics. It's based on Newton's so-called second law of thermodynamics, which is almost 400 years old. Right? And I know somebody's scientist, and that's the biggest impediment is the scientist and their second law of thermodynamics, which is a linear law. It's like it works if you take gasoline and you put it in a motor and you blow it up. That's a linear process. But when you look at atoms and stars and galaxies, those are cyclical processes. And they don't ever account for the potential energy of space, which is being imploded through both poles, and that creates the kinetic energy, which is expanded through the waiters. And as a cyclical process, this non-indemon, is perpetual. And the all I talk about perpetual motion is if it's like you have to be a crackpot to believe in it, that every single thing in the universe is in perpetual motion. Constantly changing. Exactly. And cyclical, you see that it's getting. It's like space gives to the sun or the atom of the galaxy. And the galaxy gives it back to space. And then it comes back and never ends. Well, on a deeper level, it's be interesting to see why this is all working out this way in the universe. Why there are these people that want to suppress such ideas. Or you know, just for that greed factor, why does that exist? Because the thoughts that are astronomical, I mean imagine it didn't have any oil or gold or uranium. They'd be out of business. So it's an old scene, John, what has a man who gains the world, but this is a soul and the process. And these people are pretty much soulless because their actions, the fruits of their actions, can tell the things they do and say, and the fear agenda they push and everything is about fear fear. There's no love in their messages at all. And when humanity loses love, it loses its heart and great atrocities become possible at that point. And it's kind of what we're seeing. I mean, this revolution going on in this planet, part of it is natural. And another part is scripted and pushed as an agenda. But in the end, you have to ask, how is it served? And definitely the explosion-based technologies that work stuck with, unfortunately, serves a very small percentage of the population of the planet. And they aim to keep it that way. And it's the fear of loss and the fear of sharing. And just, you know, those shortcomings of these deluminated people, they're not deluminated, they're not deluminated, they have no light in them whatsoever. And it's all deluminated, it's actually an insult to those of us that truly are the real deluminated, not the spank version of darkness filled souls that have no light in them at all. I mean, we have to get our term straight. It's like calling an open cat, but it's not, you know, it doesn't resemble a cat. You know, an artist doesn't know movement. Because he gives his art to his fellow men to uplift them, and inspire generations of people to become better men and better characters. These people do not inspire, they piece fire. Anytime they're going to die, seeing the speak on the ending means, changing what all I just immediately get the emotivated. I feel like crawling in a hole and dying because the news is awful. And just processing, it's just designed to do that, though. And that's why everybody I meet, who's a constant newswatcher, they just have no clue of the real universe. I mean, they live by chariously through their TV shows and all the garbage that's there, to build our minds with this future existence. But I mean, the calling of inspiration does come to many minutes, and I recommend anybody becomes inspired. Don't go waste that inspiration or the stupid TV show. You'll sit in your yard and develop the rhythms of nature and make something original, the original. It's the world-lacks creativity, especially in this western United States. The United States itself is just a cultural bubblegum ball that people chew on and so they're fallen. The artist is the one, you know, the genius, the artist is one who brings the new way of thinking to the world. And it's that new thinking that inspires the lead-ins of men to become better and have to stimulate it, demotivate it, you know, come down version of the life, some of my Hollywood Wall Street, and the financial and government systems that we currently live on there. Yeah, it is definitely a sad state, but I believe people are waiting to come up to this and it's all timely and you guys are presenting something that's very important to the world. If people wanted to say perhaps start with Walter Russell's work, what would be a recommendation for a source? I think the secret of life would be the best place to start. You're talking about your website? No, the book, the secret of life, but of course, you know, maths website was good. And also we've got two playlists with Rustelian science, with all the various videos we create. It's planning Rustelian science with a lot of direct reasons for this material. So that's an easy way to get involved. But you know, reading, I think the secret of the life's body that is easiest introductory book. I even say there's one more that if you really don't get the stuff, start with the man who's had the secrets of the universe by going far. It's a 59 page book or so. It'll really give you a nice introduction to this life, which was a stellar impressive life. And it's so funny to me that so few people know about this guy. But you could start with that book and then decide where you want to go from there. Excellent. Well, you said, you mentioned the secret of life. What is light? Everything in our universe, what we call light is electrical simulation of light. What Rustel says is the true light is the stillness of eternity. That's the white light, the intensely bright white light of mind, which is beyond the sensory range of mankind. So what we see in this universe of temporality is electric simulations of the ideas of light that light is eternal. Wow. Yeah. And why it also, there's one substance in the universe as Rolkl said, and that is light. And what we call different elements to consumption is our simply different pressure conditions of that one substance. Right. We can call it whatever we want, but everything is light. And that's what quantum physics is finally starting to figure out with their series of the holographic universe and everything else. But there's simply one substance, and all these substances can transcend from one into another, and we can wellfully detransmitation, which Rustel did prove in a laboratory that we're treated with. What was it? Hydrogenite, something hydrogenabric. Rustel's house, but showed his work and everything. Anyways, it's like the water engines you're seeing from like Stan Meyer. There's another guy on the net if he did a water truck who made a conversion on the fly. And we can convert water to high usable hydrogen on the fly. So we don't need to store it in tanks and risk blowing up and we'll wreck. You know, if you wreck one of these vehicles with the H.A. Joe converter, all that happens is the water spills out of it. But if you wreck with one of the actual hydrogen cars that the big automakers are producing, you know, as a supposed substitute, which only allows them to keep selling hydrogen at hydrogen stations instead of gas stations, and so you're still, you know, stuck in this loop of having to get your stuff from them. Now the H.A. Joe conversion on the fly, which Rustel talked about, you actually steamwriters, airplanes, all, you know, any vehicle that you have could do this. And it could do it quite easily, you know, which would be, especially if you fill your vehicle in water and go to your body, you know, and what that would spell is the end of the system of greed. And I think that's why we haven't seen it emerge from what we say around. Yeah, definitely. And to go back to the definition of light also, I would just say that when it, it is an electrical simulation. So there's two aspects to that. There's the dark space, the dark light of space, and the white light of incandescence of suns and atoms and galaxies. And as I was talking earlier about the cyclical nature, you know, the space is dark light. The reason that space transmits light is because it's light itself is the dark light of creation. So there is only these two aspects.