Dr. Rodney Shabazz: Introduction to Kemetic Origins

Traditionally, if you're a human origin, it was an adoption of a version of the International and traditionally European view of human origins is what they adopted from the culture and the Old Testament, or the Genesis, the sort of Genesis we started at the beginning, but in the modern sense, the modern Europeans have, for the most part, but I refuse and deny it rejected the aforementioned issue of your being respected or human origins and so the modern European view on human origins is what they like to call a unique design and scientific view. They like to call it a scientific view and they like to associate this archeological and archeological and all these things. As they talk about their modern European scientific view and origins, they would try to suggest that this ancient African view that the traditional European view and these four of you who's been trying to suggest for a mythological, that was mythology, that was religion and so on and so forth. But there's some unique racism that's part of the modern European view, that this modern European view that they're carrying is a myth that comes out of the 19th century and coming out of the 19th century is really based upon a dog on this and dog on this, there's idea in the 19th century was really an attempt to deal with some of the revelations that some of the leading European political nationalists became aware of at the beginning of the 19th century. For instance, when we're talking about the whole year in the 1790s, the whole being invaded in the 1790s and when he came into Egypt, the storm would wonder if the 1790s if it was mild because at that same time the French were involved in enslaved Africans all bloody Caribbean and the first within the English Revolution that showed the pursuit of the polling invasion of Egypt. But once the polling came into Egypt and saw the wonders of Egypt, it should look up the European world that reported what existed in Egypt really should look at the European world and the European world really had to come to Greece with the idea that the Africans were magnificent people prior to them becoming enslaved. But not all Europeans were inclined to accept that perspective and so they had the scientists began to delve with questions other than the introduction of the European origins, you know what is the, what could be another reason, what could be another perspective on this whole question of how human originating is so this is what they came up with was dogwins, dog history of evolution. But in truth dogwins still in evolution really stopped at the crime scene that dogwins dogwins dogwins still exist on evolution itself are used at the line of Prime Minister's universe begins with the self that there was no existence on earth that the world that earth was covered with water and that in that massive ocean of water that there just happened to occur on microphone in the form of a certain scientist in the other spirit. And so they say the dog wanted to say that the self and that all like evolved out of this original self and they say that they say that the self evolved into the planet and that the planet in the ocean evolved into a phoenix and that the phoenix in the ocean evolved into the fish. And so everything everything that all of these complex life forms that exist, our dogwins are basically said that they evolved out of the self of planet and ultimately the phoenix of the chair, you know in general it's what we have been trying to see. And so from the journal of Focusing, they say in this ocean evolved with fish and out of this fish in the ocean they say evolved in their 50 and out of the and 50 and they say dogwins say evolved reptile and then out of this reptile is this reptile meters, this way on command is into this reptile evolved into a lowercase mammal and that this lowercase mammal, this lowercase mammal evolved into a became eventually for priming and really this is where this is where dogwins vary of evolution stops, dogwins vary of evolution stop with the priming. Not because of the argument, not because dogwins didn't see any of the logical explanations beyond the priming but they'd like to say that dogwins might was a Christian of one again Christian and then to avoid upsetting her beliefs and creating happened in the household that he was respectful to her Christian beliefs and that he didn't extend his theory to what they say is logical explanation would mean but they were archaeologists and anthropologists that came after dogwins that are known as social dogwins, these are called social dogwins, these are archaeologists that took on the theory after dogwins and these social dogwins that came after dogwins that is they that began to suggest that the priming actually evolved into the African and so that's why I'm talking about anthropologists and archaeologists whenever they're talking about African culture you know how they describe that, you know how to archaeologists and anthropologists they prefer to have these culture as as primitively, a lot of the considered primitive when they call an African culture primitive is suggesting that this African culture evolved out of the priming culture, the monkey culture, the chimpanzee culture all right and so part of dogwins theory of evolution is that as species evolved and they become more intelligent that's part of the dogwins theory of evolution likewise as the social dogwins took to form the theory they also suggested that as humans evolved out of the priming that humans took part just a little bit of intelligence with every stage of evolution so they suggested that the African has just a little more intelligence than the priming that's why they call the African culture primitive all right social dogwins said that after the African evolved the Asians and so social dogwins said that the Asians intelligence picked up a little further but they said that human intelligence reaches as high stage as most advanced stage to state that it can no longer advance any beyond any anymore is in the form of the Caucasian so this is this is what the modern European view came in order to this all about and this is what the whole educational game not just in America in the world so worldwide teaching right now that's really not designed to affect African people although it is a mostly affected African people probably the most by suggesting that we are African people are the most inferior but it also everything is anyone anyone that is a human because what it does is it shakes up and creates perhaps from an African perspective a full sense of origin all right and so this perspective is almost a hundred and maybe degrees opposite from what the traditional ancient African view had to present and although Egypt is not the oldest African culture from the continent Egypt has the oldest deciphered literature in the world that there is no culture in the world that has a whole older deciphered literature and that which exists in ancient Egypt is only talking about what the ancient Egyptians said about human origins they have a bad reported record of the human origins and in fact their entire culture was set up to consistently persistently remind humans as to what it is the human connection to the universe and ultimately to a divine intelligent a supreme creator that same divine intelligent so being created at the modern European scientific archeological perspectives of human origins and life origins would ultimately reject they don't say that that a creator created the cell they say that the cell will just happen in the ocean one day