Dr. Ivan Van Sertima's Kemetic Science 2

The word is cansy. It's not only mean south, it means the first. It means origin. It means formal. And the Egyptians, as the upshore, the Egyptians call themselves, can you? The black people. Can you? The black land. And they saw anything that was divine, whatever your range of color, because the black, the original black, the on-mix black ranges in colors, whatever the color of the black. When it was made, when the man or woman was made into God, God is, it has to be absolutely black, because black was the color of the venity. Now why would Egyptians get so involved with that if there were white people, whatever Asianic types or semific types? The upshore, the range of other things, he showed that the cranial skulls that have been examined by William McCuy, with Oxford team. By Falcon Corver, they said that only 36% of the ancient Egyptians were Negroes. By Negroes, they mean you cannot be called Negroes, or less you have a very large flat nose, very full-lips, high-cheat bones. Now that was the classical Negroes' size, but there are many variations from that type. Even without into mixture, even without into mixture, you have different types of Africans. But they said that if you found anything but that size, it has to be a brown Mediterranean. In other words, they were trying to show that they have to be into mixed with European in order to create civilization, the upshore and coogler showed, and others showed that when you chat with you and Kumar showed that when you go to the skulls in the graveyard of Africa, south of Egypt, and even in Central Africa, they compared it with the skulls in the early dynasty period of Egypt and the pyramids were built. You compare to the skulls in the middle kingdom and you compare it with skulls even later. You are finding the African type. So when it was blood, or when it was skin colour, or when it was shape of skulls, you are still dealing with African. And then to crum it all, this was the missing link, Bruce Williams, and Keith Seale discovered in 1962. If Philharonic dynasty known as Tassetti on the edge of the Sudan, at the place called Custol, QUS, CUF, this is a very important find. It's the most important find that is the most important find that is the last 300 years. The discovery that the Pharaohs did not begin in Egypt, that the Pharaohs began in New York. They found 12 black Pharaohs raining at Tassetti, even before the first Pharaoh appeared in the first dynasty of Egypt, Aha or Scorpion or Namaminis, they found Pharaohs among the Sudan. And above all, and this is very important to find a Tassetti. They discovered that the black and the edge of the Sudan were already using the Pharaohs. They found the Pharaohs in Egypt, and they found the Pharaohs in Egypt. They found the Pharaohs in Egypt, and they found the Pharaohs in Egypt. Blacks on the edge of the Sudan were already using the Pharaohs. The words most important writing system, the Pharaohs, were already being used by the Blacks of Tassetti, at least two centuries before they took it up into Egypt. I have shown other things. In my book, they came before Columbus. I pointed to the fact that when the Sahara began to dry up one of the great Catholicism of the world, which brought the lakes in Africa in some places, 100 feet lower, the Africans began to retreat from the Sahara and the world, which was once a lush, worthy of found pictures of Africans in chariot thousands of years ago. Long before you will be had a civilisation, hunting in chariot, it's drawn under the Sahara's wall. The Sahara suffered a Catholicism. The Africans began to retreat, and I pointed out that only a few people in the world pointed out that on the basis of the linguistic evidence, on the basis of the spread of linguistic network, on the basis of the movement of scripts, on the basis of the skeletons that were found along that line moving away from the Sahara's dried up. That they were moving along shrinking platforms and they must have been following rivers, and those rivers were connected to tributaries of the Nile Valley. Three and a half years ago, the space agency tested my theory. They said, down micro wave beams, 16 keys below the African earth, and there they found the very rivers I was talking about. Where I said they would be, they found the ancient river beds running underneath the Sahara beneath the earth. It could not be seen on the ground it was seen from out the space. They saw the river beds running, linking up with the tributaries of the Nile Valley. Thereby establishing an ancient collection between inner Africa and Egypt. Colin Wilson, the anthropologist, even found that the Iq in Uganda, were sticking middle Egyptian. And as I pointed out in the agricultural system of the Sudan, later roots of Egyptian Africa, the Tamilian fruit, cultivated cock and got a system, the baku-gourd, like an area, the rarer, the oil farm fruit, the water melon, all these things are from the Egypt. If other people were making it, prepare their plants. The whole thing was absurd. Ready to dance with skin, colour, or ready to dance with culture, or ready to dance with language, you found African. And the most extraordinary evidence of the schizophrenia the blindness that invented the world, came when Professor Jorva, a exhaloant anthropologist jumped up and said, okay, it is true that the language is African. The writing is African. The culture is African. The techno-complex or technology as South-South-South-Burke had pointed out this African. The point is that we still don't know how many them were real African. Now, if you have done that with Europeans, they would go crazy. But we wouldn't be able to say that, we would just be dismissed. Because they have that power over the media, they can make absurd statements like that. And everybody got hungry. Why are you bringing up practice this? What does blackness have to do with the serious subject of history? It does not really work that way to do your dealing with history. All along, all along, all the history books even today are crowded with these. None black type mixed with Hamic, Hamic and Semai, and all sorts of people. But as soon as you try to establish, no, no, no, you're dealing with the real African here. Why are you talking about race? Why are you bringing race into it? You do know the Journal of African, my ed is the Journal of African Civilization, but there's a Journal of International Journal of African History. It wrote an article aty thing that Bansartam is a racist. Why my race is because I am trying to show that the black African played a major role in civilization. Why I'm so concerned about the black African? We are concerned not because we are racist, but because we are fighting racism. We are concerned. We are concerned because we are not judged fairly. In terms of individual merit, we have not yet entered the world at just. We are judged on our phenotype, so large the nodes are blocked, the skin, et cetera. This type of man has contributed nothing to civilization. Nobody says it so nakedly anymore. Occasionally you get some angry fool who will say it outright. But it still taught in science. We are still the people who are supposed to be superior physically, but in theory intellectually. They are very bad about that now, very recent, so do not think for one moment that we are going to forget it, because we didn't bring it up. It is twice to the bottom. We have no way. We have no choice. I went to life and I was invited not only to speak to the great audience, I had to speak to special audience of executives in Dallas who wanted to know what this fuss was about.