Published 2025-05-12 · Duration 6:53 · Video file(16 MB)
Video explores theories on alien involvement and advanced technology in the construction of the pyramids, including deaths of archaeologists near King Tut's tomb.
Transcript
Another victim was American architect Arthur Mace, who had been the person to rip out the last piece of wall blocking the entrance to the tune. He died in the same hotel with the same symptoms as Caravine, feverish and in a sudden coma. The morning after Carter had shown his friend George Gould, the tomb, Gould awoke with a high fever by not fault he was dead. Radiologist Archibald Douglas Reed was the first to cut the mumminess wrapping an X-ray at. Reed died aboard the ship on his way home to England. What caused these untimely and coincidental deaths among the invaders of King Tutstique with tomb? Could they have been caused naturally from inhaling an ancient bacteria of Iris? Dr. Ezidentahah, an eminent physician and biologist and Cairo, held a press conference on 26th of May. He claimed in the recovery of an ancient microscopic fungus that had probably survived in a dormant state for thousands of years, which could be controlled by modern antibiotics. Ironically before he could prove his theory, Dr. Tahahah was killed, of recottable relaxation. Later autopsy revealed he had died of the same circulatory collapse as the others and may have been already dead before his car coerced off the road. Could it be that there is something to the curse of the ferrows or as many pyramidologists are not theorizing that the dead vivirus that killed all these people was literally from out of this world? Could a stone age people have built these pyramids that cannot be duplicated today? New evidence we are not alone in this universe when we come back with a chilling discovery. The more we learn about the geesear complex, the more unsure we are of conventional theories for explaining the mysteries of the structures in a great pyramid. If conventional theories do not explain the purpose for the pyramids, what do more contemporary theories have to offer? In 1813, astronomer Richard Proctor discovered for ancient records that the great pyramid had indeed been used as an astronomical instrument. The pyramids are essentially crystalline in structure. Therefore highly receptive to radio-like energy waves or even cosmic microwaves. The great pyramid of geesear with its five granite slabs above the King's chamber are what the ancient Egyptians called spirit stone. They could have been a massive receiver transmitter in some distant part of the universe of which we are still inured. Based on evidence provided by Sumerian texts, it appears that the geese pyramids were built as beacons by extraterrestrials, a spot of a lending corridor ending at the space port in the Sinai Desert. There are numerous theories about the purpose of the great pyramid of geesear, ranging from the preposterous to the ingenious. But put it distinctly missing is how in this world where they built. The great historian, Herodotus, visited the geese site in the fifth century BC. He wrote that the Egyptians of that time told him that a continuous crew of 100,000 replaced every three months worked a period of 20 years to build the great pyramid. To build the great pyramid in 20 years as Sumerianologists claim would have met setting one of those huge stones every three and a half minutes, 24 hours a day. That would require a technology we don't have today. It's difficult to justify the premise that the great pyramids were built with primitive stone and copper tools. These people had no knowledge of the wheel as the means of transportation. No police, no modern surveying equipment, wincees, theirics or black and tackle. Hundreds of blocks swing 30 tons are situated high in the great pyramid. The only mechanical devices that they had were the lever, the roller, and the inclined plane. But setting the stones in place was only one of the problems. Bringing the stones from the quarries to the construction site was an equally imposing task. They removed on huge sludges or pulled across a bed of rolling logs. The stones that came from the distant paris were barged down river to the site. A great causeway led from the river landing and the stones were moved up at smile length. Once on site the stones were pulled up ramps and levered from here to here and then set in place. The process was incredibly labor intensive and perhaps the greatest single effort of men working together to accomplish a dream. There's a widespread general belief which Hollywood is hooked at the moment that hundreds of thousands of slaves were used to build the pyramids. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Egyptians of the Fourth Dynasty were neither a formidable military nation nor a very aggressive one. But even if they were, they were not enough potential slaves within a 5,000 mile radius to have supplied the workforce needed. The generally accepted academic viewpoints are divided equally between the rollers and the rampers. These two theories are being taught in the schools right now as facts when they're not even substantial theories. With the rampers' school of Egyptology we are asked to believe that a mile long ramp was built, rising in slope as the pyramid increased in height. Actually it would have required more effort to build the ramp than to build the pyramid itself. There would have been some 6 billion pounds of construction garbage to get rid of afterwards. But where is it? Does anyone know? This question is one which even the most adamant of the ramp theorist can not answer. But what about the log rollers theory? I couldn't the stones have been moved to the site this way. Moving a given stone in this manner can be demonstrated. But some rather obvious consideration should have dispel this notion long ago. The only trees available in ancient Egypt were date palms. And as a food source it's unlikely they would have been cut down. Importing logs would have required more shipping than Egypt has ever possessed in its entire history. Just to transport the 25 million trees needed. Next it's virtually impossible to roll a log on stone ship roads. But even if they could be rolled the great weight of the stones would have crushed the logs to pulp within a very short distance. There must have been another totally different method of lifting and moving these tremendously heavy stones. A device that would make the moving of these massive weights feasible. However, we know of no such device available in ancient Egypt. The Egyptians were not the architects nor the builders of the Great Pyramid. But the other one was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was the one that was