Published 2025-05-12 · Duration 5:24 · Video file(23 MB)
China's recommendations to India highlight economic challenges and military threats. Video discusses implications and government role in information dissemination.
Transcript
This 14-person unemployment billions of dollars from Hong Kong have been shipped out. The foreign reserve is coming down. The personal loan scheme that stimulus packages failed. Is that a financial reason? Is which is creating massive unrest? 2012 marks 50 years since India's disaster can be in, to fend off China's blitz-tring invasion. But conditions are still rival. The foreign reserve is a country that is challenging its supremacy in Asia as India. India is a soft target. India is not prepared to take on this war. India cannot take on the heat of this war. It is not ready. So, it is the softest target out of the three. And therefore, it will be a day. Half a century is a long time to learn bitter lessons. Pick up the pieces and make sure the country is never got off guard again. Whether India has truly drawn lessons from its battle with the marauding dragon, is another matter altogether. With the nationality and Delhi shiver in the United States. We also have with us, there are basketballs. We talk a little bit more about this. How do you look into these shocking recommendations? This devious strategy. The Chinese think tank has been making against India. I would monitor this very carefully, but I don't think that collectively, through we should know ballistic about report by a think tank like this. We call it your study the content of this particular recommendation and go back to 20-30 years. Even during the era of chairman Moussa Tom, which Chinese have always been very dismissive. And at one level perhaps also, very, very uneasy about India's democratic experience and the Indian ability to live with the kind of diversity, which perplexes many, many outsiders. So for that extent, I would say that this is not terribly new in terms of formulation that India will not prevail in India will not exist. You'll remember that even for Winston Churchill had a similar view. But I am, I'm, I'm equally intrigued by the kind of way the article seems to have worked. Because this is from the international institute for strategic studies in China. And given the way in which the government engaging controls information and dissemination of information, to me as an analyst, that is something that I would like to form that on a little more. True. You know, over there, which brings me to my next question, Do you actually think that the Chinese government could have perhaps considered this considering that such a recommendation has been posted on the internet. And you know, this is something that can never ever happen without the permission of the Chinese government. That's one of the point I think China has invested in a number of these things and institutions that are constantly throwing up as management possibilities. I want to be very talk about this contrast between China and India in terms of military power, economic power and so on. But yet another heritage, the amount of investments that China has made in creating experts to look at various regions of the world that are of broken court strategic importance to them. And there have a number of people looking at what they call their periphery because of the bet because of the way of history such as their online values. And yes, I think the fact that this particular report has come out to a professionalist's pocket same time. And we, in which the others have picked it up, looks suggest that the government invasion is not unaware of it. But how much have they actually endorsed support? That is the opaque part. I mean many years ago, you remember when the Chinese, no very, very angry with the Americans and the attack to US embassy. The government, the Chinese government distanced itself, saying that they are not doing this, but they allowed it to happen. So I think India and China really, I think, have to test each other in terms of the way in which they are stoking. What you might call as this nationalism. And again, I do want to make this very strong tea, when we should not be ballistic about this, but we should not be politically, generally. And see what the implications, why is Beijing encouraging this kind of a dissemination in a society that is authoritarian, that controls the flow of information very, very rigorously and loosely. That too, on the eve of the India China border top, right? The politics that I like to, you know, ponder over. No, right. Oh, they are basketball. Thanks so much for sharing your views on China's very devious strategy, the recommendations that it has come up for India. Well, we will be talking to you about this a little later, but let's also tell you about Rocky Sardinth, who is also ready to play. A mother was,