Cancer: The Forbidden Cures - Unraveling the Mystery

20,000 people die of cancer every day this translates to 8 million deaths every year half a million of which are Americans Americans. At the beginning of the last century, one person out of 20 would get cancer. In the 1940s, it was one out of every 16 people. In the 1970s, one person out of 10. Today, one person out of three gets cancer in the course of their life over 1 million Americans are diagnosed with a new cancer every year all these people suddenly plunge into a dark tunnel that will dramatically change their life for many years to come faced with an apparently endless chain of medical tests, examinations, second opinions, medications, new tests, surgical operations, support therapies, and follow-up checks, they find themselves at the complete mercy of the disease. While in that tunnel, each patient feeds an immense medical apparatus that employs hundreds of thousands of people and generates millions and millions of dollars for the medical and pharmaceutical industries. From research laboratories to medical schools, from prevention clinics to worldwide drug sales, today the cancer medical apparatus is so large and expensive that it needs its patients in order to survive just as much as the patients need the apparatus cancer is a big business one of the biggest businesses the typical cancer patient spends at least $50,000 to treat his or her disease with 1 million new American cancer patients every year that translates to 50 billion dollars annually spent on cancer treatment in the United States. to modern oncology cancer still remains a mystery what a century ago were just wooden contraptions able to lift only a few feet off the ground today have become sophisticated jets capable of reaching incredible heights at three times the speed of sound what a century ago was the creaking sound of the telegraph over some rustling wires today has become a global network of fiber optics where millions of people exchange information in all possible directions what a century ago was still a relatively unknown planet today has been lit by day and night and it has been explored to the extent that we can visit it in every longitude and latitude from the comfort of our home the only thing that has not changed in the last hundred years is the apparent incapacity of medical science to understand and conquer a disease like cancer why the official theory maintains that cancer is cancer is a problem that originates in the human cell cancer is a group of over one hundred diseases characterized by abnormal uncontrolled cell growth cancer is a sometimes fatal disease caused by the abnormal growth and division of cells while normal cells cells have well-defined walls and nuclei, the uncontrolled growth in cancer cells causes the creation of abnormal unstructured masses of tissue known as neoplasms or tumors. Most cancer-related deaths are due to metastasis, malignant cells that penetrate into the circulatory system and establish colonies in other parts of the body. How and where the migrating cells stop is different for different cancer types. Once the tumor cells are no longer moving, they can begin the process of forming a new tumor by leaving the blood vessel and beginning to reproduce in the new location. If the new environment is suitable, the newly arrived cell will begin to grow and a new tumor will develop this official theory also called molecular theory is basically the same that was formulated more than 50 years ago cancer begins as a departure from normal cell growth that is harmful and unceasing. If the abnormal cells grow slowly in a limited area, they are called benign tumors. If the cells are spread to other parts of the body, they constitute a malignant tumor, one that is cancerous. Cells of malignant growths break off and travel through the bloodstream to other parts of the body. There, they may start new cancerous growths. In the last 50 years, the search for the cause of cancer within the human cell has been pushed beyond the limits of anyone's imagination. Today, the most advanced laboratories are working directly on the human genome in order to identify the genes that seem to be responsible according to some scientists for the different kinds of cancer this opens the door to a dreamlike scenario for the pharmaceutical industry a world where each patient would need its own personal cure tailored to to its own personal needs. One million new patients every year. One million new cures for each and every one of them. What we want to do is we want to match the disease with the cure, or palliative treatment, whatever it is, by using the genomic tools. And's really what what the whole cancer world is now going to be about for a very long time the question whether we're going to break the cure barrier is not the question about if it's a question about when in the meantime however no one has been able to prove that the official theory is the correct one, and that the origin of cancer is in fact of genetic nature. Major advances are being made in the detection, prevention, and treatment of cancer. But the mechanisms that trigger malignant cell growth are still not completely understood. In the meantime, only to get worse we've lost the war on cancer since the 1950s the outlook for most cancer patients has remained the same a one in three chance of living for five years after diagnosis using conventional therapy surgery radiation chemotherapy The fact is that today, two out of three American cancer patients will be dead before five years. Despite such dismal results, official oncology continues to impose on patients that only three therapies that have ever been authorized in the last hundred years surgery chemotherapy and radiotherapy and two of the three are actually carcinogenic surgery is the oldest technique and the most successful of the three but surgery is useful only when the cancer is localized a minority of cases patients also fear radiation's dangerous side effects one of these is that radiation can actually cause cancer the use of radiation remains controversial even in medical circles as much as we could work with her say on a math problem she was not comprehending it it would take a long time to get like a worksheet done parts of elizabeth's brain were didn't weren't there anymore because of the radiation that it had killed that part of the brain so the part of the brain that was responsible for memory was gone chemotherapy is designed to kill cancer cells throughout the body it is highly toxic however and it also kills healthy cells today chemotherapy is often given in combination with surgery and radiation your typical chemotherapy agent will certainly cause tiredness there is a risk of sickness but there are very good anti-sickness drugs these days that can control that. Chemotherapy frequently causes taste change. It can cause a sore mouth. The first side effect that many people ask about, however, is hair loss. In fact, many chemotherapy drugs are carcinogenic their toxicity is so high that all personnel handling them must observe very strict safety rules. Their disposal calls for total destruction and incineration of anything that comes in contact with them. Some of these drugs remain partially toxic even after incineration beyond 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit. But there is something new about chemotherapy that's been emerging of late. Many women who undergo chemotherapy for breast cancer describe unsettling changes to their memory and concentration. Researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center say this phenomenon is very real. women have complained of cognitive changes that have occurred during the time that they've been treated for breast cancer for a long time now and the term chemo brain has been coined and this is used to describe loss of concentration, difficulty remembering things, having difficulty thinking clearly, and not being able to function effectively in normal activities that the person was able to do perfectly well before they had treatment. simple little things I would have to have to wait to think of something and it would be frustrating. X is red, C is green. Researchers say the chemotherapy creates memory problems that can last for years. Children are also beginning to report long-term effects of chemotherapy drugs. Things like my homework, like, let's say, like math homework. When it's real noisy, I can't focus. It just makes me feel like my mind's being erased. But is there any benefit in chemotherapy? John Cairns of harvard university published a study in scientific american he found that chemotherapy drugs benefit at most five percent one out of twenty of the cancer patients they're given to if conventional therapy has such limited results why isn't the medical profession willing to investigate alternative approaches the answer to this this question may be found in some historic events that took place almost a century ago, when official medicine finally managed to gain the upper hand on the so-called empirical doctors, who cured patients with herbs and natural remedies. In the 1800s, society sanctioned both approaches to healing. Patients had a choice of using either doctors called allopaths or natural healers called empirics or homeopaths. The two groups waged a bitter philosophical debate. The allopathic doctors called their approach heroic medicine. They believed the physician must aggressively drive disease from the body. They based their practice on what they considered scientific theory. The allopaths used three main techniques. They bled the body to drain out the bad humors. They gave huge doses of toxic minerals like mercury and lead to displace the original disease. also used surgery but it was a brutal procedure before anesthesia and infection control few patients were willing to have surgery most patients feared allopathic methods altogether satirist of the day remarked that with allopathic treatment the patient died of the cure competing with the doctors were the empiric healers contrary to the doctors they believed in stimulating the body's Thanks for watching! the patient died of the cure competing with the doctors were the empiric healers contrary to the doctors they believed in stimulating the body's own defenses to heal itself instead of poisonous minerals they used vegetable products and non-toxic substances in small quantities they especially favored herbs learned from native american and old european traditions The empirics said they based their remedies not on theory, but on observation and experience. Satirists of the day added that with empiric treatment, the patient died of the disease, not the cure. And the balance of medical power remained equal until the turn of the century. Then, new medical treatments emerged that were potentially very profitable. The AMA joined with strong financial forces to transform medicine into an industry. The fortunes of Carnegie, Morgan, and Rockefeller financed surgery, radiation, and synthetic drugs. They were to become the economic foundations of the new medical economy. The takeover of the medical industry was accomplished by the takeover of the medical schools. Well, the people that we're talking about, Rockefeller and Carnegie in particular, came to the picture and said we will put up money. They offered tremendous amounts of money to the schools that would agree to cooperate with them. The donors said to the schools, we're giving you all this money, now, would it be too much to ask if we could put some of our people on your board of directors to see that our money is being spent wisely? Almost overnight, all of the major universities received large grants from these sources and also accepted one, two, or three of these people that I mentioned on their board of directors, and the schools literally were taken over by the financial interests that put up the money. Now what happened as a result of that is that the schools did receive an infusion of money. They were able to build new buildings. They were able to add expensive equipment to their laboratories. They were able to hire top-notch teachers. But at the same time as doing that, they skewed the whole thing in the direction of pharmaceutical drugs. That was the efficiency in philanthropy. The doctors from that point forward in history would be taught pharmaceutical drugs. All of the great teaching institutions in America were captured by the pharmaceutical interests in this fashion, and it's amazing how little money it really took to do it. Surgery became viable with anesthesia and infection control, and doctors advocated expensive radical operations. These in turn produced the need for a large lucrative hospital system. Radium fever swept medicine. The price of radium rose one thousand percent almost overnight another costly technological industry entered the hospital system a drug industry grew out of the booming patent medicine business the doctors changed educational standards and licensing regulations to exclude the empirics. Soon, only AMA-approved doctors could legally practice medicine. In a brief 20 years, the AMA came to dominate medical practice. Organized Medicine launched a media campaign to associate the empirics with quacks. The code word for competition was quackery so now the average doctor goes through school he gets a great education he has to be really smart to get through it he learns all about drugs he doesn't know too much about basic nutrition i found that the average wife of these physicians knows more about nutrition than he does but they sure know their drugs. And if you go to your typical doctor today, I don't care what it is, chances are you're going to walk out of there with a prescription. Why? Because that's what he has been trained to do. The companies that make up the pharmaceutical industry are among the largest corporations in the world. Together, these businesses have come to be known as Big Pharma. In 2004, their combined global sales were over half a trillion dollars, with Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson leading the pack. In the U.S., the core of Big Pharma's immense profits is from sales of prescription medication. And since these drugs can only be prescribed by medical professionals, most of the industry's promotional and marketing activities are directed at doctors pharmacists and other health care providers this starts out at the first day of medical school and in many medical schools even the incoming students that you know are two years away from away from seeing a patient will start to get gifts from the pharmaceutical industry. And as these students get farther along in their medical education, the interactions and the gifts escalate to free lunches, to dinners. Champagne, brunches, happy hours, hours New York jet tickets no matter where you spend the money you make money and my boss always told me don't worry about it there's there'll always be more funding spend what you can in fact if I give you a hundred thousand dollars to spend Jean I want you to spend two hundred thousand before 1980 most clinical research was funded by the National Institutes of Health during the 90s most of that research got pulled out of universities and was being done was brought to for-profit research organizations the problem is that that gave virtual complete control over the research to the drug companies they could design the studies they have control of data so that met many of the authors of the most important articles published in our best journals aren't even allowed to see their own data they don't get free access to their own data and they have control of a publication to sum it all up the pharmaceutical industry first gained control of the teaching system then it gave the ama the power to exclude all other doctors from practicing then it took over the entire drug testing process while heavily influencing the medical publications that reviewed those drugs and finally big pharma extended its control over the federal entity that is supposed to verify those drugs safety and efficacy at the opposite end are the six citizens and in the middle are the doctors who must cure them based on information they can only get from the pharmaceutical industry which can no longer be verified chemotherapy drugs are in fact among the most expensive of all a one-month supply a very low to me a chemotherapy drug produced by Roche cost two thousand three hundred dollars the same supply of sorafenib Bayer's chemotherapy drug cost five thousand five hundred dollars the monthly supply of sunitinib a chemotherapy drug produced by Pfizer cost almost $5,500. The monthly supply of sunitinib, a chemotherapy drug produced by Pfizer, costs almost $7,000. The drug industry is the most successful global industry in the world. What they don't want you to do is get better, because if you get better, their market's gone. Fear, its darkness causes humanity to make awful choices with dreadful power fear can rule our lives and paralyze lofty hopes and dreams in an instant a global affliction and deployed all too often by those intent on inflicting control over the masses. Fear preys on the most vulnerable among us. Fear sells, and nowhere is fear peddled more shamelessly than in the fields of medicine and human nutrition. Fear anesthetizes us. It coerces us, making us believe that we can do little on our own to prevent or treat disease and forces whole nations to kneel at the altars of the drug industry and of course the fear mongers are also preying on fear of disease and the solution that the fear mongers give us are drugs as if by design health choices are limited information is scarce lives are ruined and the truth be damned the fear machine is well oiled by petrochemical dollars and a near worldwide monopoly in health care it works overtime to prevent the truth about dietary supplements from getting out to the public anything that comes from nature cannot be patented. They're not interested in that. So we translate that into the real world of FDA approval. Surely these drug companies aren't going to spend 20 million dollars or more testing any substance from nature because it can't be patented. That and of course the FDA says it's illegal to use unless it's been tested for efficacy and safety. Now you see the catch-22 you're in there. Nothing from nature, regardless of how effective it might be, will ever be proven safe or effective according to the FDA. It'll never be, because nobody's going to spend the money to go through the test. So therefore, everything from nature will always be condemned by the FDA as unproven, an unproven cancer cure. In a small town in northern Ontario, the year 1922, Reen Case first learned of a cancer remedy which she termed Essiac. Unbeknownst to history, this fragile Canadian nurse has heroically managed to cure thousands of people from cancer with a simple concoction of herbs. While nursing an old patient, Renee noticed that she had a scar on her breast. The patient said it was left over from a cancer she had cured over 30 years before using a mixture of herbs suggested by the medicine man from the local Ojibwe tribe. Renee tried the same formula on her aunt, who had recently been diagnosed with cancer. I went down and I asked Dr. R.O. Fisher, who later was dean of the University of Toronto, if he would watch over her, if I would try some of these herbs. And he said he would. And it took quite a while, but she got better. And she lived for 21 years. After that successful experience, Renee quit the hospital and began curing people with a mixture of herbs that would become known as Asiak, which is her last name spelled backwards. Soon the voice spread, and the number of patients healed from cancer started to multiply. In about 1943, I was diagnosed in Toronto General Hospital as having a growth in the bowel which was inoperable, and that was in January, and my husband was told that when When the snow was gone gone I would probably be gone with it. So through friends I was directed to Miss Case and I came to her and had treatments from her for practically three years and felt I was cured and I've I've had no return of it since. Dr. R.O. Bastida of Bracebridge sent me a patient, cancer of the bowel, Bert Rosen, and I cured him. So Dr. Bastida went before the town council and mayor and persuaded them to give me a building that they had taken for taxes as a clinic. That I had made a great discovery and that I should be supported in my own hometown. down. So they set up the clinic where I treated for eight and a half years in a few months the clinic was fervent with activity with patients flocking in from all different places her clinic would be full every time we were there and there were people came inances, who were not able to come in for a treatment. She would have to go out and administer the medicine in the ambulance. And as the time went on, we watched these people be able to walk in. And finally, they were driving their own car to get SCI I treated from three to six hundred patients a week and I the only way they would allow me to do this was free of charge and I had to have a doctor's diagnosis for every case i treated so we brought the diagnosis to nurse case and i took treatment from her every week for about a year and i have no cancer today it was one dr leonardo from buffalo who had immediately recognized the potential of renee's cancer cure to warn her of what was waiting ahead dr leonardo he was a cancer surgeon and he said you think you have a cure for cancer i said and way beyond thinking I know then he I had five other doctors in examining patients and he asked if he could go in with them and examine patients and I told them he could so then he told me he said you have it, but the medical profession will never let you do this to us. After a while, a mysterious group of entrepreneurs showed up, offering Renee $1 million for the secret formula. But she flatly refused, as they would not guarantee that her cure would be made available for free to anyone who ever needed it. Green case was called before the legislature in 1938 to determine Essiac's legal status. I was trying to legalize my treatment and the patients went out and got this petition signed, 55,000 names on it. And I went before the legislature and I lost out by three votes. Public outcry forced the establishment of a cancer commission to investigate herbal remedies. The majority of Reen's evidence was rejected you see they said the doctors all made mistaken diagnosis that that's why the patients thought they were cured I kept on my clinic as long as I could until they stopped the doctors from giving a diagnosis and then I had to stop and and it's a sad thing when somebody comes and they have somebody that is ill with cancer and the medical profession can do nothing for them and they beg of me to treat them it's a very very sad thing to turn them away and I had a nervous breakdown over that so I really had to stop I don't see how they can how they can refrain from from recognizing it because if you have the the proof you have the pit you have the diagnosis from the doctor you have the pathological findings and you find you have the living patient to show that that they are still alive after the medical profession has given them up and yet they refuse to admit that it is a cure after she recovered from the breakdown Renee started from scratch, brewing the herbal mixture and curing patients in her own basement. I have to grind them. I used to get them already ground. Soon the authorities began harassing her again, having her arrested more than once for the most preposterous reasons. But the fame of Asiak had already crossed the border, as one day Renee received an invitation to scientifically test her herbal remedy from a clinic in Massachusetts about 20 years ago 1958 here in this lavatory its director was dr. Charles brush who was also president Kennedy's personal physician and a close friend undertook to study the effects of a drug or an herb called asiak and we found that it was non-toxic and did have effects and help in the treatment of cancer and as a result of this at that point dr brush recommended asiak to be tested for toxicity in order to be approved by the FDA as a possible cancer cure. But once the herbs arrived at Sloan Kettering, one of the most important cancer research centers in the country, the process somehow got bogged down by inexplicable delays and eventually never came to a conclusion. The results that I reported to Green Case were studies in sarcoma 180 in the mice in which we were looking not only for possible primary inhibition of the tumor, which did not occur, but also for regressions. And there was a very small percentage in a small group of regressions, but we never had the opportunity to confirm this and to see whether we could obtain better results nevertheless asiak was not approved by the fda exactly as predicted by dr leonardo 30 years before further attempts to legalize the cure were made by different groups of patients who went as far as suing the medical authorities for denying them a possible cure for cancer. Permit them to have Essiac. They're asking to be given the right to use Essiac since orthodox medicine no longer has any answers for them. You can't burn a cancer out of a body with radiation. You can't poison it out of the body without poisoning the body as well. And I feel that nature holds the answer, the only answer for cancer patients. And as such, we should have it. Our constitutional rights at the moment are being denied to us. And it shouldn't even come down to a court hearing. It should be a matter of fact that we have what we want for our body. I have cancer from head to toe in the bone. You're going to try and tell me that if I think there's something that's going to give me a little bit of life, that I'm not going to try it? But the response from the medical authorities has always been the same, even at the cost of looking foolish for the ridiculous excuses they often had to concoct to resist its approval. If we release Laetrile and Essiac and Crabizon and so on, I can give you a very long list. You'll have a very wide choice. Then when there is something effective, how will you know which to choose from? In fact, someone thought better to prevent Essiac from being used in the future by doctors who may eventually respond to a higher calling of their conscience. As it's well known in the state of California, the state legislature actually made it a felony for a doctor to use any of the accepted methods of treatment for cancer, and they named them in the legislation. Surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and cobalt. And when doctors are handed like this, and their very livelihood is threatened, they're not going to be anxious to step out of line. Exhausted and frustrated by the endless fight, Renee simply returned home and went on treating patients on a personal basis until the day she died in 1978. One year before that, many of her cured patients convened on her 90th birthday to thank her for what she had done for them. Ex-patients and supporters arrived in Bracebridge, Ontario. They came to help Reen celebrate her 90th birthday. They have experienced the benefits of Essiac. Many of the people here feel they owe their life to Reen. Remember when you brought the two ladies up to you that day in the house? She doesn't want me. Where is it? Where is it? I have given my life for it I couldn't give any more than that God's been good to let me live this long to see it used and used by people very similar to renee's story is the one of harry hoxie a texas businessman whose father had passed on to him an herbal formula that would reveal highly effective against cancer. Unlike Rene, however, Hoxie was very wealthy and was a natural-born fighter who feared no one. This set the premise for one of the most prolonged and virulent fights between an American citizen and the medical authorities in the history of the United States. The trouble began with what seemed like good news. and we now have in our files and our records many many thousands of case histories and records pathological proof x-ray photographic studies that we do positively cure cancer both internal and external i give you names times dates names of doctors names of institutions the doctors labeled hoxie the worst cancer quack of the century. But Hoxie's supporters called him an effective healer, persecuted by a medical trust. They have never proven that this treatment don't cure cancer. The ex-coal miner with an eighth-grade education became a legend in his own time. According to the Hoxie legend, the remedies were discovered by his great-grandfather experimenting on a sick horse. As the story goes, John Hoxie was a veterinarian whose prized stallion got cancer. He put it out to pasture to die. But three weeks later, the tumor had stabilized. He observed the horse eating unusual plants, not part of its normal diet. Within a year, the horse was well. So John Hoxie began to experiment on animals with the herbs, and he added other popular home remedies. He claimed success and passed the formulas down through the family, who eventually used them on people. hoxie said his father was the first to try the medicines on people he gave young harry the formulas with a deathbed wish to make the treatment available to people whether or not they could pay prophetically he warned the boy against the high priests of medicine who would fight him jealously it didn't take long hoxie started his first clinic in illinois in 1924 and he immediately incurred the wrath of organized medicine he was arrested more times than any other man in medical history yet by the 1950s the hoxie clinic of dallas texas was the largest privately owned cancer center in the world hoxie clinics reached through. Endorsing the treatment were senators, judges, and even some doctors. Two federal courts upheld its therapeutic value. If the treatment was worthless, how did it gain so much support? To claim a cure for cancer is to invite evaluation. While the medical profession turned its back on hoxie numerous individuals did make personal investigations these experiences repeatedly turned skeptics into believers among them was esquire magazine writer james wakefield burke who in 1939 began covering the hoxie story my boss arnold gingrich one day said why don't you go down to Texas and let's expose this fella he's getting too big and the American Medical Association like to put him out of business and said you go down and get acquainted with him and says we'll do a couple of pieces on him and put an end to this so it was an assignment I came to Texas I expected to stay about a day get my information to leave I became fascinated I stayed for six weeks every day Harry would pick me up bring me to the clinic we'd come in in the morning and he would put his arm around these old men and women say dad them doctors been cutting you up says i ain't gonna let them sons of bitches kill you you're gonna live and he'd treat them and i'd watch him treat them they'd get better and begin to get well. So I wrote an outline for a piece, which I called A Quack Who Cured Cancer. And I sent it back to the editors, but it never came out. Assistant District Attorney Al Templeton was more than a skeptic. He arrested Hoxie more than 100 times in two years. Then his own brother Mike got terminal cancer and secretly went to Hoxie. When Mike Templeton got well, Al Templeton gave Hoxie the credit. Hoxie's prosecutor became his lawyer. More and more people kept supporting Hoxie's claims of a cure. His boldest promoter was Christian evangelist Gerald Winrod. His radio broadcast reached millions of listeners with sensational reports of Hoxie's mounting successes. I wish to begin this broadcast by reading for you what I regard as a very important statement. And I quote, Judge W.L. Thornton, this is the second jury of 12 men that has found in my court that the Hoxie treatment cures cancer. Ten doctors found that the number of cures reaches into the thousands. Former United States Senator Thomas studied a large number of cures. I had made my own investigation, had satisfied myself that cancer was really being cured by the Hoxie method this humble reporter can only say god bless these quacks the only quacks who are curing cancer today but a new cancer treatment needs more than personal investigations to gain acceptance it needs a formal scientific review and when i say to you all i want is to have them come here the American Medical Association of pure food and drugs the federal government anybody come here and make an investigation and if I don't prove to them beyond any question of it out that our treatment is superior to radium x-ray and surgery then I will lock the doors of this institution forever but the the medical profession did not respond to his call. The doctors claimed that they already knew from their medical education that his remedies had no efficaciousness at all, was no cure. They were just sought in their ways and adamant and their beliefs according to Hoxie there was a more sinister reason the medical profession wouldn't investigate Hoxie said the AMA doctors invited him to demonstrate the treatment among them was dr. Morris fish pine editor of the influential AMA Journal. According to Hoxley, the day after his successful demonstration, a high AMA official asked to buy the rights to the formulas. The alleged offer would have given all rights to a group of doctors, including Dr. Fishbein. Just like Rene, Hoxley turned down the offer because he could not get the guarantee that the formula would have been made available for free to anyone who ever needed it. But one thing was certain. Hoxley had made a very powerful enemy. By crossing swords with Dr. Fishbein, he alienated the most influential figure in medicine. Dr. Fishbein held a unique position as journal editor he controlled the main income producing organ of the AMA and thus the organization he also published the accepted standards of medical practice after the Chicago incident dr. Fishbein blackballed Hoxie by branding him a quack in the journal. It commented that Hoxie's most enthusiastic supporter was the local undertaker. The AMA attack was relentless. Dr. Fishbein and Hoxie would battle each other for 25 years to come in a drama of national dimensions. But rather than settling the dispute through scientific means, they played it out in the media. At the association's headquarters in Chicago, vigilant against quackery is Dr. Morris Fishbein. There is no serum, drug, or combination of drugs that we know that will definitely cure cancer. When Hoxie approached the National Cancer Institute for an investigation the agency refused the nci said his medical records were incomplete hoxie said doctors refused to supply necessary records because of dr fischbein's influence the government concluded it would be a waste of public funds to investigate having struck oil in texas hoxie offered to pay for a test himself his challenges were putting dr fishbein under public pressure and the doctor fought back hard in the public arena but when he wrote blood money for the hearst sunday papers he went too far hoxie sued dr fishbein and the Hearst newspaper empire for libel and slander. He didn't seem to stand a chance. The nation's most notorious quack faced a who's who of American medicine. Surprisingly, Harry Hoxie became the first man ever to win a judgment against Dr. Fishbein and the AMA. Dr. Fishbein had to resign from his post at the ama but the hoxie fishbein trials held an even more shocking revelation dr fishbein admitted in court that hoxie's supposedly brutal pastes actually did cure external cancers the most dangerous external cancer is melanoma. It can spread rapidly through the body. Doctors advise extremely radical surgery. Even so, melanoma is often fatal. We have more positive proven cases of melanoma in our records and the files and the patients to talk to that have been cured in this institution and any institution in the world, and that's a broad statement, but we have the facts to back it up. Hoxley went as far as producing his own movie to make his voice heard from the medical profession. It would be an innovation to men of the medical profession if, instead of devoting so much time and money to court trials, sniping tactics andear campaigns they would come to the clinic do some investigating check into our methods speak to some of our patients then they would understand why our treatment has been as effective and in most cases far more successful than anything they've had to offer as a solution to the cancer problems but instead of accepting the invitation the medical establishment escalated the war mildred nelson has directed hoxie's clinics from the beginning but he was never investigated except in a criminal type of way to see what he might be doing wrong the food and drug have always been famous for harassing the hoxie patients go to people's houses, take their medicine when it was delivered to them, talk to them, tell them they were doing wrong. But when the government couldn't stop Hoxie in court, the FDA decided to take unprecedented action. Sufferers from cancer, their families, physicians, and all concerned with the care of cancer patients are hereby advised and warned that the so-called Hoxie treatment for internal cancer has been found on the basis of evidence presented by the FDA to be a worthless treatment. and it was so successful that the FDA then went ahead and issued it in a poster form which was put up in post offices around the country. I'm swimming in blood now. They've done everything they possibly can to try to humiliate me. They've had me in court many, many times. But do I care about that? I'm not thinking about what they're doing to me. I'm thinking about the 12,000 patients who's under treatment observation here at this clinic. I'm only thinking of one thing, suffering humanity. But the government did more than just warn the public. Although federal prosecutors couldn't prove the treatment was worthless, they did outlaw it on technicalities, like false labeling in interstate commerce. At one time, we had 17 clinics open across the country. Food and drug walked in. The same day to every one of them in Padlockville. And no way did Harry have the money to fight that in court state by state after losing all his clinics harry hoxie eventually gave up his 25-year-long fight against the medical establishment he built a new clinic in mexico put mildred nelson in charge and went back to texas where he died in 1974. the mexican clinic has been treating thousands of patients over the years and is still active today under different doctors after mildred nelson passed away but the hoxie treatment has never been made available to american patients and it cannot even be shipped legally into the country those who wish to use the hoxie treatment must travel each time time to Mexico and are allowed to bring back only the amount needed for their personal use. All the diets, the health food principles, and the nutritional concepts that we share today have a single father, Maximilian Gerson. Dr. Gerson was the first to ever suggest that good health depends primarily on a healthy nutrition. Born in Germany in 1881, Max Gerson was inspired by the figure of Ignaz Semmelweis, the Hungarian doctor who discovered that in order to avoid infections in pregnant women, physicians simply needed to wash their hands in a chlorine solution. Prior to receiving his doctorate as a medical student, Max Gerson suffered from severe and repeated migraine headaches, leaving him essentially unable to function for days. After two years of experimenting, Dr. Gerson was able to eliminate his migraines completely by eating only certain raw fruits and vegetables. By 1918 word was spreading about the Gerson migraine diet, but on one occasion a patient returned with an observation. Not only had migrant been relieved but his skin tuberculosis also disappeared the astounding news spread like wildfire in April 1924 famous lung specialist dr. Ferdinand Sauerbruch offered to do a clinical trial with 450 incurable skin tuberculosis patients. At the commencement of the study, Sauerbruch said to Gerson privately that if even one patient showed improvement, he would believe every word of Gerson's treatment. 446 out of 450 patients recovered, over 99%. Dr. Gerson and his wife, Gretchen, had three daughters, Joanna, Gertrude, and the youngest, Charlotte. Of all the children, Charlotte took a special interest in her father's work. By the late 1920s, Dr. Gerson's fame had spread throughout Europe, especially after he cured Dr. Albert Schweitzer's's wife helena of pulmonary tuberculosis and schweitzer's daughter's skin disease when dr schweitzer was 75 years old came to dr gerson with diabetes and was also cured the gerson therapy aims to achieve a complete detoxification of the body through a series of intestinal washes based on organic coffee and a strict diet of raw vegetables and fruits grown in an optimal terrain. Meat is absolutely to be avoided, as explained by Charlotte, Dr. Gerson's 82-year-old daughter. Because meat in the body, in the digestive process, causes acidity acidity phosphoric acid and in this kind of acidity the body isn't able to function the body has to maintain homeostasis has to maintain a very exact level of alkalinity versus acidity once detoxified the human body confirms being a wonderful machine capable of healing itself from any given disease between 1933 and World War two Gerson his family fled Nazi persecution eventually settling in New York dr. Gerson's seven siblings died in the Holocaust throughout the 40, Dr. Gerson's success at his New York clinic stunned the medical community, but also evoked the dark forces within it. Dr. Gerson was curing patients with cancer, and as a consequence, he testified before the United States Senate on July the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in 1946, along with five of his recovered cancer patients and the medical records of five more. So stunning was this testimony that on the evening of July the 3rd, 1946, renowned ABC News correspondent Raymond Graham Swing declared on his radio broadcast to the entire United States that for the first time in history, there had been discovered a cure for cancer. The public response was overwhelming, staggering. Lighting up the switchboards at ABC non-stop, out of control, unbelievable. But what happened next was even more so. Two weeks later raymond graham swing was fired from his position at abc that he'd held for over 30 years and the pepper neely anti-cancer bill of 1946 document number 8947 now gathers dust in the archives of the United States Printing Office. Behind it all, it wasn't hard to see the hand of Morris Fishbein and the AMA. Fishbein had already been in a long struggle with Gerson, since the German doctor was the first to ever denounce the dangers of smoking, at a time when the largest advertising contributor for the AMA was in factris in a repeated national survey doctors in all branches of medicine doctors in all parts of the country were asked what cigarette do you smoke doctor once again the brand named most was camel yes according to this repeated nationwide survey more doctors smoke camels than any other cigarette max gerson was ostracized from the entire medical community who labeled him a quack continuously attacked him and harassed him i was investigated five times what do you mean by being investigated from the emma they investigated you yes five they come, I show them, here are the patients you sent home to die cured. Other patients you sent home to die cured. Next patient you sent home to die cured. What are you going to do? You don't look like the type of man that's going to give up at this point no how could i give up this when i see these wonderful results that's impossible first i write the cancer book and in that cancer book i will bring in as many cases as possible sent home to die so that every physician hears the conflict and read it and I will have it translated translated in many languages it took Gerson ten years to write the book which presented 50 fully documented terminal cases he had cured with his therapy yet Gerson found no major publisher willing to release the book in the United States at that point he was totally and forever banned from from publication in the united states why was the american medical association so opposed to the garrison therapy i think all the medical associations were opposed to the garrison therapy here comes a new approach a nutritional approach an effective approach the medical pharmaceutical industry if it even wants a cure for cancer since there's so much profit in this disease certainly does not want the cure to be a nutritional one dr. Gerson spent the rest of his life secluded in his new york apartment where he kept curing patients with the same therapy that in the meantime was being forbidden all over the united states this is where dr gerson was up until the day of his death where he had a clinic where he saw patients where patients recovered from cancer where he documented so many recoveries yet those recoveries are not available to the public those published articles have been published in europe but have not been allowed to be published in american journals why the reason for that is the fact that it's not a patented medicine and it's not an expensive medicine I mean this is the crux of the matter this is a natural therapy that allows people to take control of their own health and not require drug intervention if the Gerson therapy were permitted inside the United States and I believe that it should be, we would see a dramatic decrease in deaths from cancer. I would estimate the fatality rate would go down by at least 50 percent, very possibly more so. Exactly like Mildred Nelson, Charlotte Gerson had to go all the way to Mexico to open a clinic to cure people after her father's death over the years the gerson clinic has seen a continuous flow of patients from all over the world the medical records from over 1500 patients are available to anybody who wishes to examine them further any physician is heartily invited to come to the mexican hospital and visit and see a patient there or visit with the patients and with their permission then they would have access to their medical records but the medical establishment kept ignoring the call while officially continuing to deny the validity of the gerson therapy dr dean adele whose popular radio and television programs a fixture in american television dr adele has been representing the voice of official medicine on national television for many years i don't think the gerson's therapy has ever cured a terminally ill patient people get very confused by this uh if you think of basically what's in Gerson therapy, you really wouldn't expect it to cure cancer. But people, sometimes cancer cures itself. There is a rate of cancer that goes away by itself. Some people didn't really have cancer. It was a misdiagnosis. In 1986, I was diagnosed with pancreas cancer, which has spread to my liver, gallbladder spleen. doctors told me I had three months to live to go home get my finances in order and prepare to die my husband just wouldn't accept it I was only 46 at the time far too young, so we came home, did therapy for two years. After three months, my doctors here wondered why I was still living. They asked me if I would have a CAT scan, which I did. The masses of cancer had gone. They said I don't know what you're doing. We don't want to know what you're doing. Just keep doing it. The doctors at that time had said I would never live to see my second grandchild, which she is now 19 years old. So we proved them wrong. After the therapy, we went back to Utah to a specialist on blood, and she said my blood was so clean and clear that she couldn't tell I'd ever had cancer, and she said I was the first patient that I ever happened to. Yes, and after I had gone back to the oncologist after I had done the Gerson therapy for a couple months, at that time when they had found that i was cured of cancer from the ct scan that they had done on my abdomen he couldn't believe it he thought it was a miracle for the 10 years following being on the gerson therapy which took a year and a half i started going back to the mayo clinic and seeing dr, who was an oncologist there, just for checkups to be sure I was clear. And he said everything was like an 18-year-old again. My blood profile was perfect, and he couldn't believe how I looked and how much energy I had, and he asked me what I'd done, and I went over the Gerson therapy with him. Dr. Scutt said, that's great, but he said that we can't sell that dr wallace sampson is the editor of the scientific review on alternative medicine and aberrant medical practices which claims to present an objective viewpoint has a gerson therapy ever cured a cancer patient well of course not they won't even release their record so what would it take for you to be convinced that this therapy has credibility? Well, first of all, they have to show some reason why it should work. We know why, like how cancers behave, and we know the kinds of things that cause cancer. So they have to come up with some kind of a believable theory of why their diet should work. But second of all, they'd have to convince us that everything we know about it in the past 50 years is wrong. And they're right. Now how are they going to come up with material like that? That's impossible. They don't have it. Dr. Gerson documented so many recoveries, yet those recoveries are not available to the public. Those published articles have been published published in Europe but have not been allowed to be published in American journals dr. Stephen Barrett can be considered today's equivalent of Morris fishmine steady at the helm of his publication quack watch dr. Barrett denounces every form of therapy that the official medicine considers to be a fraud or a fake take the Gerson therapy for example Gerson was a physician who claimed that he could cure cancer with diet and a number of other methods there's absolutely no scientific evidence that he's cured anyone I was I have investigated five times from the EMA. Every time they come, I show them here are the patients you sent home to die cured. Other patients you sent home to die cured. Next patient you sent home to die cured. The Gerson therapy was known some 75 years ago. If doctors know there's a cure and send patients home to die that is an atrocity worse than the Holocaust dr. Gerd Hammer is the founder of the so-called new German medicine dr. Hammer believes that each cancer is the consequence of a deep psychological trauma that was not completely resolved by the individual manifesting in a specific kind of tumor for each kind of trauma. Despite the large popular movement in his favor, despite the support of many other doctors from all over the world, and despite the scientific evidence presented by Dr. Hammer, the medical institutions have never undertaken a serious evaluation of his work, and have proceeded to revoke his license instead. Since then, European authorities have been continuously harassing Dr. Hammer, until one day he was arrested in Spain simply for having advised other citizens on the curative method they should follow. Dr. Hammer ended up spending 19 months in a French prison. Today Dr. Hammer is a free citizen again, but he cannot practice medicine nor can he promote in any way his theory, which appears to have the potential of helping thousands of people all over the world in the 1970s dr. Ernst T Krebs perfected the so-called trophoblastic theory of cancer that had been originally proposed by dr. John beard one century ago the same theory had been developed and publicized by the father dr. Ernst Krebsbs. According to Krebs, vitamin B17, which is found in the seeds of apricots and other similar fruits, is an effective cure against many kinds of cancers, and especially breast, lung, colon, and prostate cancers. Vitamin B17, also known as laetrile, has been one of the most popular remedies against cancer since the 1950s and in the last decade has collected the support of many scientists and oncologists from all over the world In Italy, Dr. Guidetti from the Turin University undertook a scientific study on Laetrile that showed very promising results Dr. Dean Burke head of the Cytochemistry section of the National Cancer Institute, has reported that in a series of tests on animal tissue, the B17 had no effect on normal cells, but released so much cyanide and benzaldehyde when it came in contact with cancer cells that not one of them could survive. He said, when we add laetrile to a cancer culture under the microscope we can see the cancer cells dying off like flies. Also Sloan Kettering, the New York-based Cancer Research Institute, seems to have known about the therapeutic qualities of Laetrile for a long time. This was confirmed by one of the foremost cancer researchers of the time, Dr. Kanematsu Sugiura, in a magazine interview published in 1977. As the news began to spread, Sloan Kettering pressured Sugiura to refute his statements, but he refused to do so, forcing Sloan Kettering to officially deny the anti-cancer qualities of Laetrile. Sloan Kettering was later accused of falsifying the research on which they based their negative statement on Laetrile this was not the only case in the major war waged by the medical industry in the 1970s against Laetrile dr. John Richardson MD who's now deceased had had a cancer clinic, a very thriving cancer clinic up in the San Francisco area in the 70s when he met Dr. Ernst T. Krebs, Jr. He had many conferences with him, became familiar with the theory, the science behind it, and began to cautiously use it in his practice. He was losing most of his patients that he was treating with cancer. He went from that to a high success rate almost overnight by using this substance. And so he became very enthusiastic about it. The word got around. His patients were very happy, of course, and they told their friends. It wasn't very long before people were coming from all over the United States and in some cases even from Europe to be treated at the Richardson Clinic. Then he got into trouble with the medical authorities. The hospital administration contacted him and said, you have to stop using this material because it is not approved by the FDA. And he said, yeah, I know it's not approved, but it works. They said, we don't care whether it works or not. It is not an approved substance and you're in violation We'll be right back. And he said, yeah, I know it's not approved, but it works. They said, we don't care whether it works or not. It is not an approved substance, and you're in violation of the law. Medical authorities have never recognized the therapeutic use of Laetrile, while the FDA has listed it among the toxic substances, making it in fact illegal to be sold in the United States. In 1992, Dr. William Lane published a book called Sharks Don't Get Cancer, in which he maintained that shark cartilage has the capacity of inhibiting the growth of tumors. In order to grow beyond a certain size, every tumor needs to build its own capillary system. The creation of new blood vessels is called angiogenesis. Shark cartilage has a specific anti-angiogenic characteristic in that it envelops the growing tumor and literally suffocates it by not allowing the new capillary system to grow. The anti-angiogenic characteristic of shark cartilage is well known to official medicine and it's confirmed by a number of different scientific studies. But shark cartilage, for some reason, is not suggested as a cure for cancer while the pharmaceutical companies are competing in secret to produce a similar compound in the lab or to extract from the cartilage a specific compound that can be patented and exploited commercially what they are interested in finding something perhaps within something in nature if they can find some sub component that they can extract and extract and then make it a man-made chemical that works the same way, then they can patent that, then they're interested, but not if it comes from nature. Another well-known remedy against cancer, particularly popular in Europe, is mistletoe, a semi-parasitic plant found on oaks and other similar trees. Mistletoe is used to produce different medicines, like Iskador, whose effectiveness against cancer has been known for many years. I think it deserves some merit because it's nothing new. It's not a fad. It's been around a long time. It's been used for over 70, 80 years austrian scientist and philosopher rudolf steiner the founder of anthropological medicine suggested the use of mistletoe against cancer almost a hundred years ago this plant has been considered sacred since the times of the celts who worshipped it and used it as a universal ailment in a cancer patient mistletoe causes an immediate increase in the macrophages which is normally followed by a regression of the disease we do know that it has immune stimulatory properties like if you measure like cytokines they can see them actually go up with using mistletoe there's there's components in mistletoe that are actually cytotoxic meaning it actually can kill cancer cells or it can put them to sleep. In Steiner clinics, Iskador is used as part of a larger program against cancer that includes all the emotional, psychological, and spiritual aspects of the individual. In the United States, mistletoe is almost unknown, but the task of denying its curative qualities has been taken up, in this case, by the British sanitary system, which resorted to the well-known excuse of absence of evidence. The PCT has reviewed the evidence relating to mistletoe in the management of breast cancer, and we have found, and I'm one of the people that's looked at the evidence, we've found that there's no convincing supporting evidence. Recently, American author and actress Suzanne Somers announced that she defeated cancer using mistletoe. You mentioned cancer. Back in 2001, you on this program announced that you had been battling cancer. Most people would just go to the doctor and get chemo. You went a different route. How are you now? Well, I just had my killer cells tested, naturally. That's your immune system. I've been injecting that Iskador now for eight years. So I haven't had a cold. I haven't had anything. You don't have cancer? I don't have cancer anymore. The list of historic cases in which a potential cure for cancer has fallen into oblivion could literally continue for hours. From the vitamin C cure by Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling, to the infamous krabiazin by Dr. Ivey, from the molecular cures through the microscope of Dr. Reif, to Dr. Collins' toxins, the dynamics have always been the same. doctors have been ostracized derided or persecuted without their therapies ever being considered for serious scientific evaluation the last person to propose a natural cure against cancer is tulio simoncini an italian oncologist who finds himself in the middle of a storm after having declared that the origin of cancer is not genetic but it is due to the aggression of a fungus called candida albicans based on this hypothesis dr. simoncini treats cancer with sodium bicarbonate which is one of the strongest enemies of fungi in nature how does a fungus get in the body where do you think this all starts from years of research there is an end to me a big epidemic pollution because the fungus is undervalued but it is undervalued because it is not understood from the very beginning of his studies dr. Simon Cheney felt the need to reconsider the cancer paradigm from scratch and began looking for a different origin of the disease. What puzzled him the most was the fact that all tumors behave in the same way, even though they appear completely different from one another. Then he started looking for a common denominator and eventually found one. Most appear white these tumor specimens show the devastating impact the disease can have on the body this is a liver riddled with cancer the white bubbles are all tumors if you enter the body and you reach an organ affected affected by the cancer you can see that the lumps are always white. Sometimes it is covered with blood or with the defense reaction, but in every post-mortem examination scientists find the white lumps, the white masses, that is fungi. This is the pleura. We entered with the camera and look, the pleura should be red, but you can see all the lumps, all the cancer that is white. This is a heart beat. This is a bronchial cancer. Look, we went into the bronchia. Look, they are white. And then in the colon cancer. This is red because there is a little bit of blood. I washed it up. Now, look, look, it is always white. White like candida. Candida albicans, in Latin, means glowing white. It should be clarified that the presence of fungi and tumors is nothing new in the medical world all the scientists find in the oncological world the cancer patients when they die they are all invaded by the fungi but nobody wonders that is the only microorganism present in cancer patients official oncology however believes that their presence in tumors is due to their opportunistic nature which brings them to build colonies wherever they find a suitable environment this belief though seems contradicted by a careful observation of the animal world spores from a parasitic fungus called codps have infiltrated this ant's body and mind. As soon as she is discovered by the workers, the ant is taken away and dumped far away from the colony. It seems extreme, but this is the reason why. After a while, the fruiting body of the codiceps erupts from the ant's head. It can take three weeks to grow, and when finished, the deadly spores will burst from its tip. Then, any ant in the vicinity will be in serious risk of death. The fungus is so virulent, it can wipe out whole colonies of ants. And it's not just ants that fall victims to this killer. in this case it was the fungus that caused the ants death not the death of the ant to invite the presence of the fungus what normally appears to be a simple opportunist is in fact a a full-fledged assassin. Not all infections are bacteria. There are also the fungi viruses smaller fungi bigger and fungi are the connecting point from the microorganism and the animals so they can enter in a body like microorganism and they can aggregate once they are, and they can build a big mass that has the power of an animal. Candida is a very familiar fungus, known especially to women, who sometimes experience an infection in their sexual organs. The vagina is a muscular canal that leads from the outside of the body to the uterus. The warmth and moisture of this canal create a perfect environment for microorganisms to breed. For example, bacteria called lactobacilli, which are naturally present in the vagina, coexist with a yeast fungus called Candida albicans. Normally, the lactobacilli create an acidic environment that keeps the natural yeast population in balance however when conditions within the vagina change that either decrease the numbers of lactobacilli or decrease the acidity these yeast fungi begin to multiply normally the immune system keeps the fungi under control and doesn't allow them to establish colonies in your body I'll see you next time. normally the immune system keeps the fungi under control and doesn't allow them to establish colonies in your body this white cell spots a fungus in the bloodstream attacks it and destroys it if the system's defenses instead get lower than, the candida can manage to aggregate into small colonies practically everywhere in the tumor. The tumor, in my opinion, would be the set-up of the fungal invasion plus the cellular reaction that the organism puts into the body. Far from being a wild, uncontrolled cellular replication, according to Simoncini, the growth of a tumor is a lucid and desperate reaction from the organism in an extreme attempt to reject the intruder by the same token dr simoncini believes that metastasis are not cancerous cells that leave the primary tumor to go start a new one somewhere else but small groups of fungi belonging to the primary tumor that fall into the bloodstream during biopsies or during a regular surgical operation these runaway fungi settle in a new environment and prepare to take advantage of a weakened organism to establish their new colony once this propagation has started it becomes necessary to restore the immune system to its maximum potency as soon as possible if the patient is given chemotherapy instead this this only accelerates the destruction of his natural defenses, as the drug kills indiscriminately cancerous and healthy cells. While possibly prolonging the survival by a few months, chemotherapy makes it impossible for the organism to recover its defense capabilities, making it bound to succumb, sooner or later, to the multiplying fungal attacks in order to test his theory dr. Simon Cheney began treating cancer with sodium bicarbonate sodium bicarbonate is the strongest substance against a phone phone guy they cannot adapt to the to assault because you know it is not a complex substance. That's why the antifungal drug, today's antifungal drugs are ineffective because the fungi can adapt themselves in three, four days. For a fungus, you give an antifungal drug, you can kill the first layer but the second layer they are they get used and they eat drugs chemotherapy everything genaro san germano is the first patient ever cured by dr semen chini with sodium bicarbonate in 1983 he was diagnosed with lung cancer and was given a life expectancy of 6-7 months at best. In 2006, 23 years later, he gave this interview. persona molto fortunata mi sembra di capire giusto perché i pezzi con fortuna perché la macchia la miscela e traverso mi diceva la moglie ci ha messo ot Yes, 8-9 months. But the tumor has gone away. Yes, thank God. I found another one that has gone away. I don't believe it, but it went well for me. It's already there. Yes, because Maria told me that it had gone away. You didn't do any other treatment with Simoncini. Are you sure you cured this thing? Yes, Dr. Simoncini presented his documentation to the Italian Department of Health, hoping that his theory was put to test under proper scientific protocols. Not only were his findings completely ignored, but Dr. Simoncy ended up being disbarred from the italian medical order for having prescribed cures that had not been approved by the authorities this is rather unfortunate as even the ancient hindu books of medicine prescribed the use of sodium bicarbonate against cancer alkali of strong potency should be used in diseases arising from annula, schlesma, maida, cancerous growths, and such others, which are very difficult to cure. This book is over 1,000 years old. As soon as the news of his treatment started to circulate, Dr. Simoncini became the target of a major smear campaign, orchestrated through the Italian media, in which he was treated as a charlatan swindler history show gb palermo d un personaggio key dc d curare e tumore con il bicarbonato seguiteci was there a gmail is this a lot of detail come about it and i said i'm not going to consider the bicarbonato she for a contact with me to prison for having allegedly caused the death of patients who had undergone his treatment the media seized greedily on the trials delivering the final blow to dr. Simon Cheney's credibility professor Francesco Cognetti director scientific of the National Institute of Tumors of the Queen Elena of Rome one of the most important Italian oncologists not because when we talk about medicine and also innovative treatments You have to be stare attenti dice quest'uomo sto simoncini è un fungo il tumore un fungo e si cura col bicarbonato di sodio l'impressione immediata di un grande medico una tesi bizzarra voler essere ottimisti e direi che pazzesco non c'è nessuna dimostrazione che ci siano rapporti tra inf relations between fungal infections and neoplasies, let alone that fungi are the only cause of cancer as supported by Dr. Simoncini. We can say with absolute certainty that sodium bicarbonate in the tumor unfortunately does not do anything to him, otherwise it would have been very simple to confront him. can be I must say also dangerous because if administered in large doses it can determine very important metabolic imbalances that can compromise the renal function the respiratory function the cerebral heart function and therefore it is a drug that if administered in large doses important can also determine death. The paradox is that Tullio Simoncini is not an alternative doctor, nor is he against the system at all, but he is possibly the most allopathifungals at a sequential cascade. The concept in chemotherapies exists, sequential therapies made in cycles, etc. etc. Because you would have to consider the antifungals that are effective at the first moment. As the fungus varies, the antifungalungal in function of the function of the fungus, and so they are behind according to the variations. But the pharmaceutical companies should come to the field at this moment, because now they do not understand this big business that is underneath. They see, the multinational that does, sees the danger and it causes a war, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it causes a fire in the streets, it has perfected special techniques that allow him to deliver the sodium bicarbonate next to the tumor in order to obtain the maximum effectiveness with a minimum amount of sodium bicarbonate. bicarbonate is effective if you can put in contact the sodium bicarbonate with the cancer so if you want to reach the prostate cancer you have to locate before and gather in the potenda artery that reaches the prostate. Then you can administer through a port cat connected to the catheter the sodium bicarbonate directly to the prostates and kill fungi because the concentration of the salt is very high because you used the artery that is directly feeding the organ. Instead, for the cavities, pleura, peritoneum, you have to locate a transperitoneal or pleural catheter. although considered only anecdotal material and not scientific evidence there are now dozens of fully documented testimonies which appear on Dr. Simoncini's website that seem to support the validity of his innovative approach to cancer. This therapy you're talking about, sodium bicarbonate delivered directly into the tumor site, I wonder where the harm is. Seems like a very harmless therapy. It isn't a potent dangerous medicine no it's not it's not dangerous because there is a remote possibility of infection but there is the life on the other hand and then there are there are some type of cancer breast cancer doesn't need of the calendar bladder cancer brain cancer they are the breast and bladder cancer have a with the sodium bicarbonate can heal in 99% without surgery without chemotherapy without radiotherapy and let the organs there dr. Simon Cheney believes that also skin cancers are caused by a fungus and treats them with regular iodine tincture. In some cases, patients have reported even the nastiest melanomas to fall off within weeks, like simple scabs. And the cancer is gone? Totally gone. For the first time, you know, I feel like I got my life back again. Not every cancer, however, can be treated with the same effectiveness. Bone cancers, for example, receive hardly any blood at all and are very difficult to reach with the proper amount of sodium bicarbonate. Different techniques, in some cases, can be applied. The last testimony is from someone who found himself on both sides of the fence at the same time a doctor who got cancer after the removal of a primary tumor in the bowel dr lombardo learned he had some metastasis in his liver just before undergoing the liver surgery he learned that he had also developed a metastasis in each of his lungs after returning home dr. Lombardo found out about dr. Simon Cheney's therapy and chose to use the ports that had been prepared for the chemo to introduce the bicarbonate solution instead. So he had the port for chemo and instead he used it to insert the bicarbonate? Yes, to insert the bicarbonate. And where exactly did he have the port? He had the port at the height of the second costola. In the second costola, they precisely channelled the inner carotid and added the upper carotid. After a few cycles of sodium bicarbonate, a CAT scan revealed both tumors had disappeared from his lungs. Do you have a message to give to your medical colleagues? I always say that the truth is so close to the tip of our nose that we can't see it. And then there is another thing, the truth is never, there is no truth, the truth is not something that you can think of possessing, the truth is search, the truth is found only if you widen your horizons, if you enlarge your vision. told me Thanks for watching!