political unrest, technological changes, media impact, Egypt, population, economic challenges, journalism, media, technology, Egypt's population, economic challenges
Transcript
Look at all the people down there reading the flyers. That's brilliant. It's gorgeous. It's genius. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's going to be so nice. I'm sure you've got to be more content in my sit. I'm going to start a part of British Sea since I was in a 40 year. Having said the first approach, you would kind of act like the experience that can be led to the attacks. And the information is around that kind of matter. The community is the only second holder of that position. We name how to live. The responsibility is to express themselves over the growth of the yeast and the many of the diversity. And the deep out of the head, the best classified integration that ever sets for a volume of the death of the existence of the firemen. People say the cause may have a challenge to reputation for cultural diversity by starting flying in its way. But that's what we're doing now. We can be together to serve it with good luck. We're going to be a good one. We're going to be a good one. And I think it's all principally in relation to the issue of the yeast. And I think that's a great question. I have a back for all my work from the standards. The theme, I've chosen how much of sequences to stay in the need as a push-off answer to that question is it needs to start. But actually it's not too much to be there. It may be this price, it may say it. But obviously that needs to be significantly expand. Now the first thing is, I already want to mention, is the idea of trends which underwrite understanding of important and temporary events. It's not so much trend, since it were last year. They do many, a few months and a few years ago. And I'm going to let you draw a tower of the men between the weight of political unrest, which is sweetly through millions and very silently, non-rexual communication and all the same. The weight is the number. Really what ties these two events together, and of course a number of other events, is the confusion of power away from the states and the power of individuals and small groups of individuals, but a new technology. And although I think we are understood for a significant amount of time already, there's a size of shape of power of power in terms of this relationship between state and the individual, we're getting much less good about and just editing what it's constantly. Just twenty-five years ago, a few people say that they're trying to talk about it. The same actually has a lot of communication. But first of all, a word of warning, the fact that it is a word of warning, that we're getting into. In my experience in this little bag, the media, a lot of stories, which is essentially about the subject. And projects being published by the famous egg. And I think our perception of rightly based hand, and what's happening in ancient, is that the main knowledge of the need to be addressed, if there's a purpose of how many people I take, it's sort of repound this, the equation, and give you a slide to it, and I point to you. I mean just a point of view, in character, in character. It's not just, but let's contend the right to a little class in the face, but that kind of character and talent, communicating through the session. There in my talk came about Egypt. 40% of the population is in nature, and exists on less than $2 a day. And what we have to remember, I'm not saying we see really as a sexist, journalists, and even the Southland, the rest, in the world, and what you have, there are nine of these forces in Egypt, also being not by the social, political change. That is actually quite difficult to predict, where this change will end up, and I'm happy to ask the questions about Egypt, probably being one of a few people in the school, and I think it will be certainly next, in the background, and certainly in the atmosphere, and other people that. Anyways, back to the debates, back to the issue of constant background, when you think about the press, the technological change. And I think I would take two key questions together. How does the public in Egypt actually serve a lot of efficiency? And how does the public address serve my revenue in the journalists? And it's very difficult to answer either of these questions with any percent, because they're too broad, and too in turn, the national sense, but they can give us almost all of this on a case by case cases. And it's true that it was examining the particular hits, and asked for questions, that you may not agree with the volume of decisions that create a measure against the specific specific. So the questions are, I'm not going to try once, but I'm actually making sure that you realize that's the fact that I've probably interested about efficiency, and I've probably interested, I don't know, if you've just. But they're all, as I were ready, indicated in all the amount of shepherds, further fishy to principle, which are all set by thinking, I'm explain it further. The first is the extent to which technology advance through all of the rules of civil and violent blood. And obviously the greatest segment is the mental risk of childbirth. But they are shifting our perceptions and what might be described as public space, and what in time to resonate is time for financial space. I mean, mostly what you expect in this room, the individual is to do it in a choir, and to great privacy, even if you have a tendency to hear about the volume of terror, or the needs of the criminal, as a state. And I think we will be generally accepted, that the most localization is large and small, all-seater required maintenance of their existence for the benefit of their mental health and their charity. However, it was absolutely the main question that technology is significantly shifting, and the whole framework for relationship quite fundamentally between systems and government. And this is why a public need to achieve this very important, dramatically high-loss of the problem. Now, it's quite extraordinary if you read about these in a rather tight media, or maybe a very tight touch. There is much consideration of problems, but they do have a personal seek, and they do, as it were, and they should very important. You know, we are being hit by a kind of a technological response. So what I think is important to us is the the assand story of this album in a distraction. It's a piece of very, I'm living on a flat path, not a very important issue. And why do I think he is, in terms of what we are trying to play, I'm living in several ways. First, he is completely unable to reflect why the brilliant, brilliant, well-intitted. We support a cause that is no more radical of proposition than that the citizenry has a right to scrutinize the state. So let's talk a little more broadly about this. I mean, in general, what's your philosophy? Why is it right to encourage leaking of secret information? Well, there's a question, what sort of information is important in the world. What sort of information can achieve reform and there's a lot of information. So information that organizations are spending economic effort into concealing. That's a really good signal that when the information gets out, there's a hope of it doing some good. So you know, the really good one is good. Military is keeping information secret to prosecute their part of a war that also to high abuse. And there is a military argument for keeping some information secret. It is very timely. So the next example of where troops are about to deploy. But that information expires quickly. And this information ranges from 2004 to 2010. And the next example is, I would say, that if you imply the government's protecting the status of the conspiracy of the sonos, then we, the citizens of victims of that conspiracy, it's a little unbounded. And pay the security for the sonos. And maybe some pressure groups get around and try to make a real effort to be transparent. I mean, three things, it's a very, very good example. And let's say it's a general, similar, a different area. And the third thing I would say is if you're charged with wrong theory, the jurisdiction, you're universally respected for its best independence. The normal way for a head is to face our position. Especially if you leave yourself here, and frankly, it is completely illegal to suggest what a Swedish commissioner is making pressure of our citizen forces. If you really think that you're in conspiracy there, you have to say, we don't understand the way the government relations work. So what I see is that the sonos has attended this time. We're very, there's much lives of them here, much more involved than they can. They can be each other and they can drive. And it seems to me that because of this unforged, drugst position, the way it leads to the normal seems to be no worse, sophisticated, than government seats, you see, bad. For this greater, an absolute transparency, good for the citizens, let the shaggy have been viewed, I need to give disclosure or disclosure of sale. And frankly, I'm not really an athlete, and my life is the issue to care for you. If you leave, my expression is like a subtle life serves you, blood, that he's actually acting in public interest. So that any attempt is to lay in one eye of the past, I think his values are surprised with the distinct view of his name across his religious values of the British, my style in my suit is very, very deaf what you actually put on session. And even if you erase it, it's actually still not that, and you can read it. So take those decisions and we'll care. And the last thing we need to say is to include in talking about less than 5-10 per month, of course. It brings us all to count his benefits, and I'm sure that none of you can make what we're like and what you like about it. And the balance is unquestionably important. But it also creates income to potential for Mr. It acts in power, threats from bullies, and relying in religions in power, free class, terrorist and extremists. It acts in the vast opportunities to acknowledge peace and independence. And because of the scene in which massive dark can be shared with millions, it focuses in a very pivotal and difficult position where it's no real way of understanding or challenging what the consequences of certain actions might be because they can really need a broad cause and shift it across the same way as people. And I think for that reason I urge you to do this we want to think about how the feelings of what and the stop are and how to do it. I hope this is all you have. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Have a wonderful very little to be part of our past six to like, and in practice. Hello. Hi. I'm very responsible for you. I'm really pleased to be here. I'm really pleased to be here. I'm a keen transfer. I suppose it's said, and the employees of the state are ultimately high-light public. So I'm delighted in the public interest that there are under thousands of the wrong he's not an accession, it's been a time, or which point for that to come back to the downwish statement, which I wish you explained about, and this is a really interesting question for you. Well, I'm telling you straight away that the children are your own deaf. I'm not surprised to you, I just like to share the audience that what's in the down-shave, that so Richard did not say, was that everyone calls it back and he talks a lot about the motion of it. The literature actually is now so it's inevitable. It's not just to reduce it out of the limited reaction just by by the production for terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. But the intelligence impacts of the influx of around the policy and I find that the terrible betrayal of everything that's not received from the telephone and the intelligence service is so deep-fly. And I'm also very proud of the interest and now wickedness and the experience and terribly uniting of life. Well, I think this kind of transparency can be incredibly significant model. Because it's the point that the information like that and that's what what the seven interactions do and that's not attention to being gives. I think the most significant point that we can be comfortable and let's find out that information and we will go from there. Thank you. Thank you. I just like one of the small points that the audience do never say that she just made a misinterpretation. And what else is more important about it? Is that you going to write it? Yes. Yes. Yes. But we start off with you. We start off with you. Give up. Why are you looking for a lady? It's not an end. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady. I'm not a lady.