Alternative Cancer Therapy and Amygdala

as you might eat if you were also eating the whole fruit well how many apricots can you eat at one time for the average person probably six eight eight or nine and you're you're through you see so that is a very safe range for most people myself I eat six or eight or sometimes ten at a time and I might do that several times a day and I've never had a reaction of any kind and I've known people that weigh less than me to do the same thing but nevertheless our advice is eat four or five at a time and there would be absolutely no danger Norwegian authorities claim that amygdala effective cancer therapy hasn't been proven you mentioned in your book that Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center has done some research on amygdala could you comment on that yes this is one of the most difficult things for people to understand it certainly was for me to comprehend and that is that that the scientific community might be extremely biased and that scientific truth sometimes gets sacrificed for other motives the bottom line is that lateral has been proven scientifically to be effective but when you look at the scientific papers that come out of institutions like the Sloan Kettering Institute you find that there has been deliberate falsification of the data now I have documented that in my book there's no one has ever challenged the documentation because it comes directly from Sloan Kettering itself you see the early tests the early tests inside Sloan-Kettering proved that laetrile was highly effective in the treatment of cancer, and they buried those reports. They did not want to publish them, and they took the research project away from the scientists who were working on it and gave them to other people who would come up with a, quote, correct answer. And those reports were not supposed to be seen it turned out that there were people inside loan Kettering who were totally outraged at this business and they released the documents one of them was a head of public relations for Sloan Kettering dr. Ralph Moss and he finally resigned at the very end of it he said I quit you know he said I went out of here and he gave a press conference and he said I they were asking me to deliberately falsify the findings of our research and he said I could not do that so it's hard for people to believe that institutions as prestigious as Sloan Kettering and others would falsify information but they do and the reason they do is primarily the reason i wrote my book is to show that the politics and the economics of cancer are much more complicated than the science of cancer the science is easy but when you get in this other side of the the cash flow side and the political side it's uh it's dirty business and that's the reason I wrote my book how effective is amygdalin in treating cancer compared to conventional methods do you know anything about statistics yes I do know something about statistics and first I should say that there have been no massively based large number controlled statistical analysis with double-blind studies and all that sort of thing so let's acknowledge that but that doesn't mean there are no statistics because there are plenty of statistics available from the clinics and the doctors who have been using this substance and I have been looking at this for quite a few years I visited most of the active cancer clinics around the world and I talked to the patients I've attended a lot of conventions where people congregate who are following these theories I talked to thousands of people I've gotten a lot of letters back because of my book and so forth and I have a pretty good understanding of what's going on out here first of all we have to understand that most people today who turn to lateral therapy turn to it after they've tried everything else this is a last resort for most people that gone through surgery radiation chemotherapy and the doctors have said sorry there's nothing more we can do for you you probably have maybe four or five weeks left to live so get your affairs in order sorry goodbye that's when they turn the lab so therapy so it's not surprising that many of them don't make it at that point what is surprising is that as many of them make it as who do you say now here are the statistics those who turn to lateral therapy as a last resort we'll come back to the other group in a moment those who turn to it as a first resort let's take the bad group first those who turn to it as a last resort only about 15% of them are going to return to a normal life well that's not very good but 15% is not bad when you consider that without that they would all be dead so in that group 15% does not sound impressive unless of course you're one of the 15% and that is very good but they start with a tremendous handicap because their immune systems have already been weakened by the chemotherapy and the radiation now let's look at the other group those who turn to lateral therapy first without weakening their systems with radiation and care of the therapy chemotherapy now the numbers flip over and it's 85% of those people statistically from what I have seen with you know thousands of observations 85% of them are going to be able to return to a normal life and only 15% are not going to be able to make it so that's the comparison and it's a I think it's a very strong reason why people should have freedom of choice to choose the alternative therapy therapies if they wish to do that so the 85% that we circle our life the tumor disappears completely that's a good question does the tumor disappear completely in most cases yes but the deeper answer is it doesn't make any difference because the view that alternative doctors have about cancer is that the tumor is not the cancer the tumor is the symptom of the cancer they're concerned with what causes the cancer what causes that tumor to grow And they believe it's an imbalance in the natural mechanisms of the body. Most tumors are not pure cancer. They're a mixture of cancer and benign cells. And the more cancer percentage there is, then the more serious the cancer is, the more rapidly growing it is. But most most of them are a mixture so if you got rid of all of the cancer in most patients you'd still have some tumor left but it wouldn't be cancerous and so they don't worry about it well it doesn't look too good but there it is and gradually those will be reason about the dump that's left and they'll have it removed surgically, but it's only for cosmetic reasons. Isn't it strange that orthodox doctors don't use this compound more? It seems strange at first that orthodox physicians don't use use this but when you understand how the system works and and how drugs become approved and how they're put into the marketplace and once you understand the cash flow through it then it's not strange at all because you see there's no money or very little money in treating cancer patients with a natural substance lateral therapy is by comparison very cheap compared to chemotherapy for example you can you a person who is being treated with orthodox treatments especially in the United States would have to sell his house and cash in all of his savings they spend all of their life savings in the last few months of their life and then they die anyway you say it's extremely expensive whereas lateral therapy is mostly just for the time that you spend the substance itself is very cheap so it would seem strange that physicians don't know about it or use it but once you understand the cash flow elements now that does not mean that the average physician who's treating cancer patients is deliberately deciding to let the patient die