Page 29 of 94
testing.) Likewise, being hooked up to an electrical testing device (or using a phone) may switch the subject due to EMF reaction. And of course, whether a computerised "tester" or a human one is employed, the answers can only be as good as the device or the tester's knowledge and questions. If the real cause of the problem is unknown to either, one will not likely benefit greatly. author who uses muscle testing, but his practice of it is | testing.) Likewise, being hooked up to an electrical the very epitome of why some people avoid muscle __ testing device (or using a phone) may switch the subject testing at all costs. In his book, he describes how due to EMF reaction. And of course, whether a smoking tobacco can be good for you (or him) and how ~— computerised "tester" or a human one is employed, the "it muscle tests good". Translation: this is the height of — answers can only be as good as the device or the tester's knowledge both the allergy/addiction syndrome and the delusion of — and questions. If the real cause of the problem is unknown making muscle testing come out the way one wants. __ to either, one will not likely benefit greatly. Sure enough, | had the misfortune of meeting this individual at someone's party. There was a sign banning _ Rapid Corrections for Learning and Reading Problems smoking, and despite my asking him not to smoke, as it Specialised kinesiologists have made great inroads in was making me ill, he condescendingly ignored me. This _ testing and correcting, or improving, learning and highlights his disdain for other human beings and the _ reading disorders and possibly more serious brain law, and his delusion that this "natural" product is not — disorders. Some of this involves cross-crawl exercise-—the harmful to anyone because he believes it is good forhim simultaneous use of the opposite arm and leg, like (an addiction). And his muscle testing | trust is clearly walking in place. Cross-crawl exercises go back to the something not likely to be the least bit accurate. | have 1950s and Glen Doman, Carl Delicato and others. They said that sometimes the best kinesiologist is someone pioneered the use of the cross-crawl for brain-injured who uses the least kinesiology. It is well known that — children and adults. Unfortunately, results either took a tobacco, and/or the smoking o' very long time to occur or little it, releases many toxins. It is not appreciable benefit was ever something that even needs to be tested observed in some cases. on the non-delusional. While i Likewise, being hooked u A major advance was provided is possible that some young 2 by Paul Dennison, PhD, in the super-healthy person migh to an electrical testing early 1980s. A fortuitous event muscle et scrong fr an att | device (or using a phone) f <2" when someone wa his would be the case for may switch the subject exercise and happened to someone old and addicted to due to EMF reaction glance left at the phone which obacco. Likewise, there is potentia was ringing. An immediate cure of the person's dyslexia danger in self-testing, whether via occurred. Also, by then, some inesiology, pendulum or any people were doing the cross- other method. If we are in an addictive state regarding a crawl with the hand crossing over and touching the ood and we know which foods we are testing for, our opposite knee instead of going straight up in the air as minds may make the self-test show "safe" when the food Doman and Delicato did. is not. So self-testing, if we do not have a regular Dennison knew that looking left accessed the subject's partner, has the potential to be influenced to yield the __right-brain hemisphere while doing the cross-crawl, and results we want. his helped yield the immediate positive result. This Another thing to be wary of is predicting the future. It ormed part of the basis for his Dennison Laterality is important to recognise that any testing is only valid | Repatterning (DLR) Exercise. It included a second part or the time of the testing. Many variables can later of homolateral (same side arm and leg) crawling while interfere with and change things, so any parameter may ooking right. However, others, including myself, would est differently the next day or so. ater show that part of this was an incorrect Basic AK methods can be great for alleviating chronic interpretation of things—despite how often disciples atigue and/or so-called brain fatigue. Often the body's would test that it occurred. In more detail, Dr Dennison energies are not flowing properly, and what the energy assumed that because the person showed a dyslexic inesiologist calls "neurological disorganisation" or endency to start out with—muscle tested strong while "switching" occurs. Corrections can involve holding, ooking at parallel lines (homolaterality), and tested apping or rubbing certain points. As always, how long — weak while looking at an "X" (cross-laterality)—the two something lasts depends on what is causing the problem __ results should be reversed after the correction. I have in the first place. Some testing and correcting of | shown that not only is this wrong, it is impossible. "switching" should occur first in a kinesiological session. You cannot "extinguish the homolateral" aspect, as That is because if energies are "running the wrong way", that still occurs in the body. There are cross-lateral and all the results can be inaccurate. Many times physicians, | homolateral energy flows in the body all the time. And and others, use muscle testing without ever taking homolaterality per se is not bad. The eyes are connected courses, and their results may all be inaccurate. (It is far to both the same-side brain hemisphere and the more involved than it looks, if one cares to have accurate — opposite-side brain hemisphere. You cannot "extinguish Likewise, being hooked up to an electrical testing device (or using a phone) may switch the subject due to EMF reaction. 28 * NEXUS OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 20II www.nexusmagazine.com