Nexus - 1801 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

NEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCE in limestone formations around the rim of this ancient crater over 700 kilometres away to the northeast on the Yucatan Peninsula, but nowhere near Guatemala City (for references, check http://ngm.nationalgeographic. com/ngm/0310/feature4/). Another sinkhole in Guatemala City opened up on 23 February 2007, but there was no heavy rainfall so the cavern beneath it could have formed long before. Witnesses reportedly heard very loud noises underground “about a month before". I discovered that both cities occupied the same point relative to the Sun on 21 January 2007 at 16:03:02 GMT (Guatemala City) and on 21 January 2010 at 10:34:24 GMT (Geneva). Simulations show an exact overlap. This fits the time stated by witnesses very well. In my view, this giant sinkhole was also caused by a micro black hole. While the Guatemalan cenotes are all closer to the epicentre of the Chicxulub crater, there are other sinkholes. Of the dozen or so largest known on Earth, many exist in a circle around the Chicxulub crater. Some are actually fields of several sinkholes. Now, two new ones have opened up in Guatemala City, adding to this great circle. Some of these could be related, just as the closer ring of cenotes in Yucatan may be. simulation to match any events onger than about 6,000 years ago because such software can only be accurate enough for time periods ess than this. All we know about he age of the Chicxulub crater is hat it was formed 65 million years ago. The other giant sinkholes which ook so tantalisingly out of place where they are, such as the famous Blue Holes in Belize and in the Bahamas, may be 100,000 years or older and we have no accurate dates of creation, so it will never be possible to match them with Geneva using the orbit intersection method. Is there cause for concern that this micro black hole is stable and could still be growing, deeper inside the Earth? We can even ask ourselves if the Chicxulub event itself, which, it is stated, brought about the creation of our species by wiping out the dinosaurs, may have been caused by a micro black hole and not by a meteorite, but all we can do is speculate about any possible answer. Is there cause for concern that this micro black hole is stable and could still be growing, deeper inside the Earth? The truth is, we simply don't know. Established science still believes in the Big Bang Theory and doesn't have a clue that the "greatest experiment in human history", as the LHC has been described, could also be the deadliest. Professor Stephen Hawking believes that such micro black holes simply evaporate because of the radiation associated with them. A professor at Germany's Max Planck Institute, however, has calculated a 50 per cent chance that they would be stable. Perhaps both are correct, because it appears that these micro black holes are only stable for a few hours or less, according to the proximity of Geneva and all the explosion sites, or the sites of both sinkholes, in 3D orbit simulations. LHC Experiments Must Be Stopped! What should be concerning all of us is that if these prominent physicists were so sure that these micro black holes would form, why has CERN not released any information whatsoever about these having been observed so far? The LHC has caused hundreds of these micro black holes, but, because they have all been temporally transferred, CERN is still blissfully unaware of them. Since my previous article was published, more related atmospheric explosions have been verified: a 30- kT explosion over Afghanistan on 27 September 1962 at 15:29 GMT, and a 13-kT event over Antarctica on 3 September 2004 at 12:07:21 GMT. These also occurred on the rare orbital intersection points, as explained in the article. These bring the number to 10, indicating an impossibly small probability of many billions to one that the connection between these events and the site of Geneva and also the correct time- frame (and orbit) for the operation of the LHC can be "mere coincidence”. The LHC must be shut down immediately. Above all, CERN must not be allowed to build yet another one. Physicists are already lobbying for a Linear Collider—again, based on the hollow assurances of safety from the same people who were responsible for the LHC. Governments asking for advice from these people, who still believe in the Big Bang Theory, is like you or I consulting the Flat Earth Society for the safest route in planning a world cruise. No wonder we're in such an absolute mess. oo (Source: Olaf Thomas Raabe, email otrropie@gmail.com) be growing, deeper inside the Earth? Gravity, Creation and Extinction The greatest factor affecting emporal transfer is gravity. Is it a coincidence that almost all the atmospheric explosions linked to the LHC and now both Guatemala City sinkholes are in areas of the Earth with the greatest gravitational anomalies? There is a gravity map on he Internet which has been compiled tom detailed measurements, upon which such areas, only a small percentage of the Earth's surface, are coloured red. The explosion sites and he two sinkholes match these areas. It is impossible to use 3D orbit 50 * NEXUS Is there cause for concern that this micro black hole is ; stable and could still DECEMBER 2010 - JANUARY 2011 www.nexusmagazine.com