Page 54 of 96
others will complete it. But it has to be understood two; but all eight, or nine, considering the Virginia because, if these objects are stable for periods of ayear explosion? Most convincing are the 3D orbit or more, in all probability there will be more such simulations which show just how rare orbit "bombs in the orbital path" waiting for the Earth to _ intersections are, and also show links between the sites collide with. However, luckily for us, it appears that they —_ of the explosions and Geneva and/or Switzerland. By may not be stable, because the explosions all occur on _ the time you read this, | hope to have uploaded videos intersection points on which the time-transferred onto YouTube of various simulations so you can judge singularities only need to exist for a few hours. for yourself (with the keyword "NEXUS" in the titles for As | write this in August 2010, I'm concerned about the —_ easier searching). I may also have to explain how next intersection points in September 2010 and January to temporal transfer occurs in colliders as a natural result February 2011. I also need to explain regarding the Cando __ of the Contracting Matter theory. I'll keep you posted. and Lugo events that the LHC supposedly was not oo operational in January 2010, but recommenced operations in March 2010 after the initial problems. The data, About the Author: owever, clearly suggest a connection with 18 and 19 Born in West Germany in 1954, Olaf Thomas Raabe has anuary 2010. Was the LHC being tested on these dates? worked in public service in Germany and Australia for many Since completing this article, I've discovered that years. With a lifelong interest in astronomy, cosmology and another explosion—on 24 January 2007 over Richmond, __ physics, he became suspicious of assurances by physicists Virginia, USA, at around 8.00 about the safety of the LHC pm—exactly fits with an experiments as these are based on intersection point on 24 January Time transfer caused by the unproven Big Bang theory. 2010, with Richmond heading | — ¢olliders may occur in both — J I", his opinion, the only theory straight for Geneva at 17:32:35 which fits all the scientific GMT, the time of equidistance directions along the time evidence and can explain why being 23:00 GMT. This would i ‘ micro black holes can be mean that the LHC would have line, which means that temporally displaced Is been in operation on that day we may yet encounter sonnracting Matter theory. The ll, bef the official 9 a rbital Precession Intersection rocommencement n “Marah explosions similar to evidence is indirect proof of this 2010. More connected those on the list. theory. Tom Raabe can be contacted by email at explosions may yet be found. This is a work in progress. otrropie@gmail.com. Dan dn ntnn two; but all eight, or nine, considering the Virginia explosion? Most convincing are the 3D orbit simulations which show just how rare orbit intersections are, and also show links between the sites of the explosions and Geneva and/or Switzerland. By the time you read this, | hope to have uploaded videos onto YouTube of various simulations so you can judge for yourself (with the keyword "NEXUS" in the titles for easier searching). I may also have to explain how temporal transfer occurs in colliders as a natural result of the Contracting Matter theory. I'll keep you posted. Time transfer caused by colliders may occur in both directions along the time we may yet encounter explosions similar to those on the list. More at Endnotes More Temporal Transfers Expected If my theory regarding the unstable nature of time- displaced singularities is not correct and further singularities have been created along the 9 September 2009 to 2 February 2011 orbit, we will have begun to collide with them any time from 9 September 2010. We can only hope that this will not be the case, because it is a matter of life and death for us all... Even if the time-displaced singularities are unstable and further explosions caused by singularities sent to the orbits of 2007 and 2008 did not occur, the possibility that the LHC is creating explosions along the time line is reason enough to stop this experiment and to prevent any attempt to build a new and even more dangerous linear collider. Time transfer caused by colliders may occur in both directions along the time line, which means that we may yet encounter explosions similar to those on the list. The frightening thing is, we simply don't know—but we can't wait decades for the scientific community to reassess the risks. | understand how difficult this may be for many readers to understand. Temporal transfer? Exploding micro black holes? But the evidence is too strong for it all to be coincidence. One explosion, sure; maybe even 1. Docobo, J.A. et al., "Investigation of a bright flying object over northwest Spain, 1994 January 18", Meteoritics & Planetary Science 1998 Jan; 33(1):57-64 2. Cevolani, G. et al., "The Spectacular Airburst over Lugo (Italy) on January 19, 1993", Astronomical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (submitted 1994); Cevolani, G., "The Explosion of the Bolide over Lugo di Romagna on 19 January 1993", Planetary and Space Science 1994; 42(9):767-775 3. Tagliaferri, E. et al., 1995, “Analysis of the Marshall Islands Fireball of February 1, 1994", Earth, Moon and Planets 1995 Jan; 68(1-3):563-572 4, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Mediterranean_event; http://tinyurl.com/2fc3ler 5. D'Auria, L. et al., "10 September 2005: A Bolide Airblast in the Gulf of Naples (Southern Italy)", Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Osservatorio Vesuviano, 13 March 2006 6. "Meteorite most likely cause of boom, observatory says", New Zealand Herald (online), 12 September 2006 7. Richelson, Jeffrey T., "The Vela Incident: Nuclear Test or Meteoroid?", The National Security Archive, Electronic Briefing Book No. 190, 5 May 2006 8. Kasatkina, E.A. and O.1. Shumilov, Geophysical Research Abstracts, vol. 7, 2005, SRef-ID: EGU05-A-00257 54 * NEXUS line, which means that OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2010 www.nexusmagazine.com