Nexus - 1706 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

e Kee lett to .. more Letters to the Editor "BS" I feel it to be urgent to http://www.sovereignty turn becomes the new them, though this is bring these projects to your party.org.au. opposing power) and_ incidental to the strength o attention. I love your magazine; thank structures of powers, etc. their case). For more information, you for it. It is between rival powers: Population control is no visit http://www.thezeitgeist | Best wishes and regards, states against states, civil a science; it is a politica movement.com. Tracey T., Australia wars between opposing program, as is eugenics (no' Roger T., Guildford, UK (Thanks, Tracey: | tookalook armies, nobles against to be confused with (Thanks, Roger. 1 think at their website and found myself kings, palace coups, etc. Of genetics). Individua Zeitgeist has "gone viral" for quite impressed with many of course, alternative ideas scientists can be as barmy anyone using the Internet or its their ideas and approaches to have to come from one as the next man: being a accessories who is interested in issues. | will be keeping abreast of person initially, but unless scientist doesn't make conspiracies and the like. 1 am what their plans are in the future. taken up by many and then anyone _ infallible. Al watching with interest to see how Ed.| these form a rival power science is tentative theories, The — Zeitgeist Movement group, such ideas are only as good as the las progresses. Ed.] NEXUS Conference Praise hidden in the noise of failed attempt to falsify Dear Duncan: NEXUS everyday discourse. hem. Australian Sovereignty does it again! Having Marshall's assertions from — So Marshall sets up straw Hi Duncan: I've been a attended the full 2010 either fiction or anti- men and attempts to knock massive fan of your mag for NEXUS Conference, | am_ establishment figures (even them down with assertions many years. I've studied the certain | speak for all fellow as esteemed as Bertrand instead of facts. Quixotic. ways of the world for longer, guests: it was absolutely Russell—who I have time for [Then he proposes that and got pissed off that | brilliant! People made and corresponded with, "we" create an alternative. could find no way to make a spontaneous comments like demonstrated with and Who does he mean by "we"? change other than grow my “so much more than I admire) make his whole Does that include the own food, be aware and expected"... thesis laughable. If that's Taliban? teach my kids to question The presenters were of the best "evidence" he can Next, to Ramiel Nagel's everything. very high quality, the stalls concoct, then he has no "Living with Phytic Acid in Upon doing some were amazing, the venue argument. Where is the our Diets". When Nagel says research last week, I was spot on, and a great scientific dictatorship things like "[b]ut raw is stumbled across a political time was had by all. anywhere in any shape? definitely not nature's way party, established in Thanks, Duncan and co. There are even fewer for grains, nuts, seeds, February this year, which Wolfgang F, Qld, Australia scientists in the new UK legumes and even some wants to bring back and live government than previously, tubers like yams; nor is by the Magna Carta, human The Scientific Dictatorship for example. In any quick cooking or rapid heat rights and common law. I'm Dear Duncan: Thanks government I know of, they processing such as not a big fan of any pollie, again for a stimulating and form a minority if they are extrusion". So can Nagel but after reading their web informative issue [17/05]. here at all. Not that beinga tell me: where do all the page | rang them the next However, there were a few scientist can mean much: animals, reptiles and birds day and now await some things which were self- there are generally as many (and even some plants) do paperwork. contradictory—more so such qualified opposing their cooking? Not to I was wondering if perhaps than sometimes happens. hose in power. mention humankind for the you have heard of them (I'm Andrew Marshall's odd "Sciences" cannot be, by first million years or so. It guessing you have): the essay on the scientific their very nature, "directed". seems to me that evolution Australian Sovereignty dictatorship is not Scientists can. Science is a_ got by quite well. It seems it Association. | think many, consistent with evidence. process of determining the is very much nature's way to many people would be very The story of humanity has truth of the Universe by eat raw. Now, this isn't to interested to hear about never been between the testable, repeatable say phytic acid and phytate these guys, and | wondered free-thinking individual (a evidence; anyone can do it; may not be okay, but such a if you would perhaps do a_ variable description of those and, in so doing it, they are lead-in undermines Nagel's story onthem if you deemed who have ideas different doing science; and many argument big time—which them worthy. rom the prevailing statist non-establishment is a shame, as I think the All | ask is this: please ones, of which there will be scientists do (you print rest of the article has have a look at their web several mutually exclusive some of their stuff, rightly substance. page and decide for and usually ignorable ones brandishing their — Kind regards, yourself. Their website is until one of them in their credentials if they have lanC. or NEXUS ¢ 5 OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2010 www.nexusmagazine.com