Nexus - 1602 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page 32 of 88

Page 32 of 88
Nexus - 1602 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

This means that while irradiating food may decrease subjecting them to toxic chemicals or cooking them at outbreaks of food-borne illnesses, it will have the high enough temperatures to kill anything that might have unintended consequence of increasing the number of _ been alive (such as the almond itself). Now, all the raw people who get sick from other infections (and chronic almonds consumed in America are purchased from diseases) due to the fact that their source of natural overseas growers, where raw still means raw. medicine has been destroyed. For many Americans, you Raw milk has also been under attack in California and see, salad greens are their one remaining source for elsewhere. The USDA supported laws that essentially phytonutrients. Given their diets of processed foods, junk banned the sales of raw milk, requiring milk to be foods and cooked foods, there are very few opportunities __ sterilised, too. for these consumers to get fresh, phytonutrient-rich foods If you now irradiate all the fresh produce, you have a into their diet. And now the USDA wants to take that food supply that is predominantly sterilised—otherwise away, too, by mandating the irradiation of all fresh known as "dead". And dead foods lead to dead people. produce. That a society's health regulators would want all foods to Let me make a rather obvious prediction, on the record. be dead should be downright shocking to anyone who If the irradiation of fresh produce goes into effect in the | knows anything about health and nutrition. Live foods United States, rates of infection among consumers will keep people alive, but dead foods make people die. It's sharply increase, not decrease, due to the removal of __ really not a complicated concept. immune-boosting natural medicine from the food supply. The USDA's definition of "food safety", however, is Consumers will also experience based on the idea that the health of higher rates of cancer, heart one immune-system-compromised disease, dementia, eye disorders, . \ individual who can't handle a little diabetes and even obesity. By That a society's health E. coli is more important than the feoume the omsands ot | regulators would want all onsons heath 0) ts emi irradiation will leave many foods to be dead should be be killed tor everyone. hth consumers defenceless against 9 9 I stron isagree with this modern society's many health downright shocking to approach. We should not expect challenges. | foods to be sterilised. In terms of It is no exaggeration to say anyone who knows anything food safety, emphasis should be that a policy of mass irradiation about health and nutrition. placed on boosting the health and of fresh produce is as blatantly immune systems of individuals so stupid as the Romans building they can survive occasional their aqueducts with lead-lined waterways. As historians contact with E. coli, rather than on trying to create a sterile have explained, after the aqueducts were built the water environment in which nothing is alive. As it turns out, the delivered to the Roman population was contaminated with _ people susceptible to food-borne illnesses are precisely lead—a heavy metal that causes numerous health __ those individuals who have compromised immune systems problems, including insanity. Many historians blame the due to their intake of vaccines and antibiotics. Thus, it is lead-lined aqueducts as one of the primary reasons why = modern medicine that has made these people vulnerable to the Roman Empire fell: its leaders went mad, and the rest — food-borne illnesses. Blame the drug companies, not the is history. I would argue that America's leaders are __ bacteria. already mad, but that's beside the point. But the USDA would rather blame the food. However, If we start irradiating our food, thereby destroying its blaming conventional medicine for the harm it has caused nutritional value, we are going to unleash a cascade of to the human immune system is not politically correct. It's unintended consequences even greater than those of the __ better to blame the food, then use scare tactics to announce Romans' aqueducts. Absent the protections of yet more outbreaks and hope for a public outcry for phytonutrients found in plants, the health of most widespread food irradiation. And that brings me to the consumers will rapidly decline, and we'll see the US thrust — "final solution" on food irradiation. into a quagmire of chronic disease and medical bankruptcy. (It's already heading there, of course, but The social engineering recipe killing the food supply will only accelerate the downward There is a corporate-sponsored plot underway in the US spiral of health.) today to keep people sick and deny them access to That a society's health regulators would want all foods to be dead should be downright shocking to anyone who knows anything about health and nutrition. The social engineering recipe There is a corporate-sponsored plot underway in the US today to keep people sick and deny them access to information about natural cures (such as medicinal foods) that would prevent disease and keep people out of the hospitals. In more than 1,500 articles on this website (NaturalNews.com), I've documented the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) criminality, the USDA's Let's sterilise all the food! The USDA has never met a food sterilisation plan it didn't like. It backed the recent raw almond sterilisation law that went into effect in California last year [2007], forcing all almond growers to sterilise their almonds by 32 ¢ NEXUS www.nexusmagazine.com FEBRUARY — MARCH 2009