Page 61 of 96
Zealand (as indicated by DNA matches) get to _ the results of the laboratory findings. As it turned out, the Bakersfield, California? producers decided to have three segments, each a 3. How was this particular animal transformed into _ different story, in a one-hour episode, and at the end they such a petrified state that it could only be cut with a sharp —_ would deem each story "proof positive", "proof negative" scalpel blade? or "proof undetermined". The end result, to my surprise, A small portion of this animal is now in the hands of a__- was that they determined my material to be "proof Canadian scientific laboratory. We are trying to negative". Later I was able to determine exactly what had determine the age of the animal by carbon dating. What a occurred for them to arrive at this conclusion. surprise it would be if this entity were a thousand or more Prior to their shooting the program, I was instructed to years old. Would this answer any of the posed questions? take the sample to a lapidary and have a small rectangular Again, the answer would be no. I have come to the piece cut away from the specimen. I was given precise conclusion that this is the way research in ufology goes: | measurements for this cut. I followed their instructions try to solve one problem, and you wind and had the sample cut, and then I up with three more things to question. presented the piece to a producer who This seems to be the nature of the in turn took it to a laboratory at the beast. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). There, a learned professor Adventures in television I have come to the performed a SIMS (secondary ion mass n an attempt to procure funds, we . - spectrometry) isotopic ratio study on have used television production conclusion that this is the sample. His conclusion was that companies to pay for some of the . the sample was nothing more than a testing. However, we have found there the way research in piece of ordinary silicon, used widely is a price to pay. Here are two . in the computer chip industry. This examples of this: ufology goes: try to really mystified me, since at least four 1. A local Hollywood production solve one problem, other laboratories had previously company decided to do a program on . . obtained results showing non-terrestrial the alien abduction subject, called and you wind up with isotopic ratios. re Grays’ Agenda, wnich aired a three more things to jitter the program aired, ucts ew months ago on The History . . able to find the name of the Channel. The producers initially question. This seems professor who did the test and I to be the nature of the beast. asked me to participate in the contacted him. He was a bit show, but because of their "budget defensive and I told him that I did constraints" they withdrew their not question his integrity or his interest in my work. After the abilities. He told me that he show aired, I was relieved I had hoped I was not upset because he not contributed to the program as had taken only a small tip from the it turned out to be one of the most sample to do the analysis. I found insulting and destructive television this confusing and asked him what pieces on this subject that I have he meant by "tip". His answer ever witnessed. was that he removed the tip of the 2. In 2004 I was asked to participate in a TV program, _ triangular piece which I had sent him via the producer. I Proof Positive: Evidence of the Paranormal, produced _ was flabbergasted, because the specimen that I had cut by another southern California company, and given to the producer was a precise rectangular Cosgrove—Meurer Productions, because a piece of | shape. This solved the mystery of the presented result. material in my possession was suspected to have come Someone in the TV production company had switched the from the site of a UFO crash in 1947 in New Mexico. _ pieces! I notified my agent about this, and he in turn Several individuals and I had held a press conference in contacted one of the producers of the show. Her Roswell in 1997, the 50th anniversary of the Roswell comment was: "I couldn't care less." crash. During this press conclave, we showed the Now, was this all bad? No, because the funds derived material and the related scientific data. from the program went to pay for the analysis of several I agreed to do the show and was impressed with the other specimens. So goes the battle for knowledge and quality of the endeavour. The producers flew Jessie truth in ufology. Marcel Jr into Los Angeles to film him saying that the material looked like something he had seen in 1947 onhis _ Examination of the implanted objects kitchen floor. Neither I nor any of the other participants We have hypothetically divided the surgical specimens was told during the shooting of this program that there _ into several categories: would be any conclusions drawn at the end, referencing 1. Metallic. This type of object is characterised by a beast. ufology goes: try to solve one problem, and you wind up with three more things to the beast. Examination of the implanted objects We have hypothetically divided the surgical specimens into several categories: 1. Metallic. This type of object is characterised by a NEXUS ¢ 61 I have come to the conclusion that this is the way research in question. This seems ‘to be the nature of AUGUST — SEPTEMBER 2008 www.nexusmagazine.com