Nexus - 1504 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page 41 of 81

Page 41 of 81
Nexus - 1504 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

In the case of proximate Mercury, at 0.4 Sola Electro-Magnetic Resonant = astronomical units (AU), resonant contact is . “O° Degrees = 22-25 Sept (Equins) maintained while the planet moves through Eeert Faced Gamapots 1° of its orbital progress. (Note that 1 AU is [tan eee the measure of the Earth's distance from the _ | é ‘acerees Sun.) Further out, Jupiter, at 5.2 AU, eesti pi appears to maintain solar excitement over 1.5°. However, with distant Pluto, at 34.4 AU, the single observation as yet available indicates that resonance was enhanced for a period of over four years as the planet travelled from 5° before to 5° after the SER- X position of 255°. But there is another, even more complicating, observational puzzle to be confronted. Sunspots are readily visible from Earth, as is their progress across the face of the Sun. The Sun's rate of rotation varies, and the solar day is about 24 Earth days at its equator, extending to over 30 days at the poles. As one might expect, sunspots are stationary and their apparent movement is explained by solar rotation. But the highly variable beams of energetic particles ejected from the four Mercury-dictated SER-X portals are fixed relative to the solar-centred plane on which Why, then, was there a record sunspot count (352) on 30 March? planetary orbits are described. In direct contradiction to sunspots, _I speculate that it was because of the additional impetus provided at in celestial terms these beams are stationary—meaning that they that time by a short-term assemblage of specific angular don't rotate as the Sun rotates. Clearly, scientific understanding has separations. As can be seen in figure 1, Earth and Venus (period much catching-up to do. 0.6 years), both rapidly orbiting planets, shared an angular position BN Feam Dinta and 19N° feam Mantuna Alen Maro had an ACG af Figure 1. Record sunspot count, 30 March 2001. Jupiter and Pluto were in diametrically opposed SER-X positions. They and Earth, Venus, Neptune, Mars and Mercury were also in an unusually large series of resonant angular separations. = Dota Seer ot rayne rans Engen ct [10 Why, then, was there a record sunspot count (352) on 30 March? I speculate that it was because of the additional impetus provided at that time by a short-term assemblage of specific angular separations. As can be seen in figure 1, Earth and Venus (period 0.6 years), both rapidly orbiting planets, shared an angular position 60° from Pluto and 120° from Neptune. Also, Mars had an AS of 30° from Pluto and 72° from rapidly orbiting Mercury (period 0.24 years); and, as already mentioned, Jupiter and Pluto had an AS of 180°. In addition, Pluto was 30° and Jupiter 60° past perihelion, and Saturn 30° before perihelion. (The perihelion locations of all The 2001 sunspot peak 30° from Pluto and 72° from rapidly orbiting Mercury (period 0.24 Sunspots provide a readily observable and convenient proxy for —_years); and, as already mentioned, Jupiter and Pluto had an AS of solar eruptive activity and hence for the intensity of the solar wind. 180°. In addition, Pluto was 30° and Jupiter 60° past perihelion, Whitehouse (2005) and many others carry plots of sunspot and Saturn 30° before perihelion. (The perihelion locations of all observations back to the introduction of telescopes in observatories in the early Solar Pigcin-Magnetic Resonarit 1600s. Observations reveal, after a virtual 0" Dagroms. = 33.95 SaptiEquircs) absence from 1645 to 1715, prominent 9-13- a . . Evant dune Taras year cyclicity in sunspot abundance, which Gate: 20 Dee Rd still continues. Archibald (2006) illustrates eee a ees past and projected cycles. Sepecntion Fsauits. laa Aa Soon and Yaskell (2003) tell us that as early as 1800, William Herschel had noted a correlation between diminished sunspot Ant Forvphes too ° . Legend prevalence and low-crop-yield years in ae England. Herschel subsequently read, at a Peer sceptical Royal Society meeting, the paper fare ri on his findings, thus elevating from astrology ieext & to astronomy the concept of an Earth subject ald = to external influences. fear E Little Pluto, which has a long period (248 peas ‘Z ida Mig Fes years) and an eccentric orbit, has remained relatively close to its perihelion for the past 30 or so years. Figure | illustrates planetary relationships in March 2001. Pluto was in the SER-X position at 255°, and massive Jupiter was 180° away, straight through the Sun, in the SER-X position at 75°. There would have been a powerful enhancement of solar resonance, although with Jupiter's orbital period of 12 years it could not have been narrowly circumscribed in time. Figure 2. Asian tsunami, 26 December 2004. Angular separations of 60° between Earth and Mercury, and between Mercury and Venus—Mars, were present at the time of the first earthquake on 24 December; an AS of 120° also existed between the latter pair and Uranus. Rapidly orbiting Mercury had reached the SER-X 165° position by the time of the second quake on 26 December. “O" Degrees = 32-23 Sept quince) (Event | Asms Tecra Gate: 24-06 Dew. Hee SER in TE cape ad i Tas Moar Fd = * Feige 4 aru m3 vs v tor i ton & — {ier € ey iy =F 1 | il ages Der SS ere ee = aed ee JUNE — JULY 2008 NEXUS = 41 Solar Eleotro-Magnatic Resonant *. “O° Degrees = 22-25 Sept (Equines) lb le netic Resonant * www.nexusmagazine.com