Nexus - 1501 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

However, this is never quite achieved since some of the kinetic the negative primary carries momentum p- in a direction opposite energy is always dissipated as friction and converted to useless heat. to its motion, the momenta of both collision partners point in the What is also of great interest for solving the creation problem, same direction and so add up to p+ + p-. The only condition to however, is the reversal in direction of all momentum arrows in the maintain momentum conservation across the collision is for both upper figure, to represent primaries of negative mass. This means to remain unchanged. that these primaries are made of negative energy, and inspection AtB, the collision is offset so that scattering occurs. No change of shows that momentum is again conserved. It follows that our momentum can occur in the X direction for the same reason as universe could be made of negative energy and we would never applied to case A, but now transverse momenta pr- and pr- are added know this is so! Consequently, negative energy is just as probable in both positive and negative Y directions so that they cancel. as the positive kind and works as its mirror image. To solve the However, as shown at C, these add to those in the X direction creation problem, it is necessary to consider the existence of both (vectorially, as illustrated) so that each has an increased momentum kinds at the ultimate level of reality and then find what happens _p» as compared with the incident value p. An increase in momentum when the two kinds interact by demands an increase in energy, and so collision. each primary has been forced to gain energy of its own kind by the collision. Then, as shown at D, both are deflected in the same transverse direction. In this example, the masses were assumed to be equal and opposite. Then it is readily shown that the added momentum component has to be exactly transverse, as otherwise the two energy gains will not balance. In general, collisions occur at all ...a complete analysis taking Collision breeding this into account shows that, The ECM theory shows that energy, not mass, is the true building substance on average, there is an energy of everything in existence, as shown i i by Pearson (2007). From Newton's gain from the two particle . second law, an unrestrained object, collisions of primaries of opposite when pushed by a "force of action", energies equal to 20 per cent moves in the direction that the force is a . . . pointing. A force, pushing an object of initial kinetic energies. free to move, causes it to accelerate. angles between 0 and 180 degrees, The moving force produces "mechanica but a complete analysis taking this work", a form of energy that is transferred to the object, causing itto into account shows that, on average, there is an energy gain from gain the energy of motion. This "kinetic energy" adds to the "rest the two particle collisions of primaries of opposite energies equal energy", from which the object was made when standing still, to to 20 per cent of initial kinetic energies. yield a "sum energy", corresponding to "inertial mass". This means Further detail can be obtained from my book Creation Solved?, that mass increases with speed, in contrast to the assumption used in —_ published in April 2007. It is mainly descriptive but is a primer the original Newtonian mechanics. for a mathematical text to follow shortly (see the website Negative energy primaries accelerate in the opposite direction http://www.pearsonianspace.com). For people not so to the force of action so that the energy of mechanical work is mathematically inclined, I would like to end by drawing attention negative. This negative energy adds to the negative rest energy to the appendix. Most people think they will never understand from which the object is made, so that a mirror image of the maths since it looks too difficult—but appearances can be positive kind appears. Two negative primaries in collision will deceptive! I have therefore set out a simple derivation with every bounce away, just as do billiard balls as illustrated in figure 3A1, step fully explained. Please try to follow this slowly and so there is nothing strange about negative kinds. It is only when carefully. Then I am sure you will see the light. opposites interact that strange things are predicted. This derivation has also been selected to illustrate one of the Now that the law of conservation of momentum is understood, simple blind spots which physicists and cosmologists seem so it can be applied to the collision breeding of opposites, as prone to having. That the universe is in a state of ever-accelerating illustrated by figure 7.6 taken from the new book. At A, expansion has been staring them in the face since 1929, and none primaries of positive and negative energies meet head on. Since of them, even today, seems to have noticed that this is so! oo About the Author: * Martin, Brian (1997), Suppression Stories, Fund for Intellectual Ronald D. Pearson is a mechanical engineer with over 17 years’ Dissent, Box U129, Wollongong University, NSW 2500, Australia, university teaching experience in fluid mechanics and __http://www.uow.edu.av/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/ thermodynamics. The inventor of a "gas wave turbine", he is a * Pearson, R. D. (1991), "Alternative to Relativity including Quantum fervent exponent of engineering physics being regarded as a Gravitation", Second International Conference on Problems in Space high-status discipline. His book Creation Solved? Part I (see and Time, Petrovskaja Academy of Sciences and Arts, St Petersburg, review in this edition) sets out a "Big Breed" theory that shows up September 1991, Proceedings, pp. 278-287 flaws in the Big Bang theory. + Pearson, R. D. (1994), "Quantum Gravitation and the Structured Mr Pearson can be contacted by email at Ether", Sir Isaac Newton Conference, Russian Academy of Sciences, rdp@ronaldpearson.plus.com and via St Petersburg, March 1993, Proceedings, 1994, pp. 39-55 http:/Awww.pearsonianspace.com. + Pearson, R. D. (1997), "Consciousness as a Sub-Quantum Phenomenon", Frontier Perspectives, Spring/Summer 1997, vol. 6, References no. 2 pp. 70-78 + Feynman, Richard P. (1985), QED: The Strange Theory of Light + Pearson, R. D. (2007), Creation Solved?, Part | of a trilogy, and Matter, Princeton University Press, 1985 http://www.pearsonianspace.com * Gribbin, John (2004), Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the * Schwarzchild, B. (1988), "Very distant Supernovae Suggest that the Emergence of Life, Penguin, 2004 Cosmic Expansion is Speeding Up", Physics Today 1988; 51(6):17-19 * Guth, A. and Steinhardt, P. (1989), "The Inflationary Universe", in * Smolin, Lee (2007), The Trouble with Physics, Allen/Lane, 2007 Paul Davies (ed.), The New Physics, Cambridge University Press, ¢ Weinberg, Steven (1989), "The Cosmological Constant Problem", 1989, pp. 34-60 Reviews of Modern Physics 1989 Jan; 61(1) ...a complete analysis taking this into account shows that, energies equal to 20 per cent of initial kinetic energies. contacted d by and email at via 56 = NEXUS www.nexusmagazine.com DECEMBER 2007 — JANUARY 2008