/Nexus - 1501 - New Times Magazine/pages/0050/image.png)
Page Content (OCR)
NEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCE Some refer to this as "gravitic linear durations without realising that there isometrically in an inversely proportional communications". Gravity itself is are no actual linear years to count. manner. This alone allows for the instantaneous. There is no speed to This should be evident when we make existence of space in relation to the gravity, which is why it is impossible to reference to the age of the universe condition of the universe remaining relative detect gravitons and/or gravity waves. corresponding to billions of years and _ to the system of reference. Gravity is simply a condition of field as _ consider the possibility that we could take In this respect, each system is separated determined by the underlying force of photographs of past conditions through the _ by a time-line differential and not by linear energy sustaining and perpetuating the lens of atelescope. We think we can see into distance. Our attempt to apply linear dynamics of any unified field system. the past by looking away from the Earth, roportions to the dimensions of space In order to understand the instantaneous — simply by equating distance with time. results in a flawed perception and/or nature of the universe and _ better Unfortunately, time does not correspond concept of time and space. Although it understand time lines, we might reconsider _ to a linear duration or a linear distance. | may not appear obvious to everyone, this is the idea we have about light speed—that Time itself is the primary cause affecting the one thing stopping us from moving the linear motion of light can be measured the condition of the universe. In this forward. We appear to be stuck in the using a one-metre rule and a clock. In this respect, time determines the simultaneous _ linear mode. respect, it has been determined that the speed of light corresponds to the time it Mass and energy takes light to travel a distance of one metre, We tend to equate energy with mass said to be exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a without considering that the ratio of energy second. er unit of mass is not the same for all We wrongly assume that each of the materials. We merely assume that more 299,792,458 portions of a second is of mass corresponds to more energy. Ina mneans we are using static terms and | UA past and future | ieee Scourate assessment concerning assuming each portion of a second to be of do not exist in terms the ratio of energy per unit of mass. an absolute value. A A In relation to an underlying force of On the basis of this sment, we of linear durations, energy, referred to as NTFFA, the smaller wrongly define "c" as a universal constant, but do exist in terms mass of a similar material has the higher which in itself defines our perception of the of a simultaneous ratio of energy per unit of mass. In terms universe. This allows us to measure the properties of the universe in terms of light-years, despite the fact that there are no light-years or even any linear years to count. So, we make reference to millions and billions of years in relation to the age of our planet Earth and to millions and billions of light-years in relation to the size and age of the universe without considering the simultaneous nature of the universe. Time lines do not correspond to linear durations of time, but correspond to simultaneous differentials in non- simultaneous in nature and hydrogen is linear time field frequency acceleration highly accelerated, there is a higher (NTFFA). The past and future do not exist nature of the universe in terms of cause and _ proportion of hydrogen than of any other in terms of linear durations, but do existin effect. If time is different for every system element. Hydrogen is simply the least terms of a simultaneous condition of the — in motion, it should appear evident that all _ resistant element of the universe. universe, whereby time lines take on a systems must exist simultaneously in order purposeful meaning. Therefore, the that they might exist together within the Sun-—Earth distortions concept of instantaneous transformation is bounds of a single unified field system. If we consider the time line of the Sun in not only a possibility but a fundamental And as each system itself exists as a relation to the time line of our Earth, we aspect of the universe. unified field system, all conditions of the _ will find that the Sun, the centre of the nnivarca mnot avict cimultanannely in ardar — calar fiald hac an avtramaly hich ratin of of a single atomic structure, hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element. This suggests that hydrogen should be viewed as the most energetic material of the universe. It is due to the high ratio of energy per unit of mass that hydrogen represents roughly 75 per cent of the universe's physical matter. The hydrogen time line runs much faster than that of any other element, whereby hydrogen is simply a very fast element. And because the universe is condition of the universe, whereby time lines take on a purposeful meaning. linear durations without realising that there are no actual linear years to count. This should be evident when we make reference to the age of the universe corresponding to billions of years and consider the possibility that we could take photographs of past conditions through the lens of a telescope. We think we can see into the past by looking away from the Earth, simply by equating distance with time. Unfortunately, time does not correspond to a linear duration or a linear distance. Time itself is the primary cause affecting the condition of the universe. In this respect, time determines the simultaneous isometrically in an inversely proportional manner. This alone allows for the existence of space in relation to the condition of the universe remaining relative to the system of reference. In this respect, each system is separated by a time-line differential and not by linear distance. Our attempt to apply linear proportions to the dimensions of space results in a flawed perception and/or concept of time and space. Although it may not appear obvious to everyone, this is the one thing stopping us from moving forward. We appear to be stuck in the linear mode. The past and future do not exist in terms universe, whereby time lines take on a nature of the universe in terms of cause and effect. If time is different for every system in motion, it should appear evident that all systems must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist together within the bounds of a single unified field system. And as each system itself exists as a unified field system, all conditions of the universe must exist simultaneously in order that they might exist at all. Therefore, our perception of the universe should correspond to a simultaneous condition of the universe, in that time accelerates symmetrically to the centre of the field and simultaneously decelerates Sun-Earth distortions If we consider the time line of the Sun in relation to the time line of our Earth, we will find that the Sun, the centre of the solar field, has an extremely high ratio of energy per unit of mass focused to its core. The time-line differential between the Earth and the Sun is immense and continuously increasing. This, in itself, provides the space existing between the Earth and the Sun. Time perception It is important that we reconsider our existing perception of time, as our reference to something having occurred 10 or 20 years ago sets up a mental frame of reference whereby we think in terms of NEXUS + 49 of linear durations, but do exist in terms of a simultaneous condition of the purposeful meaning. DECEMBER 2007 — JANUARY 2008 www.nexusmagazine.com