Page 61 of 83
government. "The government"—as you and I and Thomas Jefferson dollar space program, using internal combustion rockets and the like, may think of it—is really quite outside the loop. Rather, a select, as been a primitive and an unnecessary experiment, since much more tightly controlled and compartmentalised "black" or unacknowledged —_ advanced technologies and propulsion systems were in existence project controls these matters. Access is by inclusion alone, and if you —_ before we ever went to the Moon? NASA and related agencies have, are not included it does not matter if you are CIA director, president, for the most part, been as much a victim of this secrecy as has the rest chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee or UN secretary- of the government and the public. Only a small, very general: you simply will not know about or have access to these compartmentalised fraction of NASA people know of the real ET projects. technologies hidden away in these projects. Certainly my uncle, who Indeed, the situation is so dire that senior Joint Chiefs of Staff elped design the lunar module which took Neil Armstrong to the leaders in the Pentagon whom I have briefed have no more access to = Moon, was as much a victim as any one insofar as he was denied such projects than any other civilian—unless they are on the "inside" —_access to these technological breakthroughs. He had to rely on the old for some reason. But this is rare. hysics and the old internal combustion jet thruster technologies just To acquire and maintain such power, all types of things have been _ like everyone else. What a shame. done. We are reminded of that Robert Frost poem in which he The inescapable reality is this: this secret project, no matter how describes "the webs we weave". well intentioned initially, got carried away with its own secret power. But how does such an entity extract itself from such a web of It abused this power. It has hijacked our future for 50 years. In fact, secrecy, deceit, lies and insubordination? the quiet coup d'état of the late 1940s and early 1950s, once exposed, To be specific, this group has usurped power and rights not legally _ could result in real instability today. granted to it. It is extra-constitutional, in both the US and the UK and in other countries around the world. Relations with ETs I will grant the possibility that, at least initially, this covert But the situation is actually much worse than this. undertaking was designed to maintain secrecy and avoid instability. All that is written above is dwarfed by a larger problem: the covert But the risks of inadvertent leaks—or a national or world leader group running these UFO-related black projects has also had exclusive deciding legally that it was time for disclosure—made it essential to sway over the early days of an embryonic extraterrestrial—-human weave a web of greater and greater relationship. And it has been tragically secrecy and of illegal operations. And mismanaged—nearly to the point of now the web has closed in on the genuine global catastrophe. operation itself. . For what happens when an unelected, That is, the complexity of the How would society react unappointed, self-selecting, militarily compartmentalised projects, the degree to the knowledge that trillions oriented group alone has to deal with of unconstitutional and unauthorised inter-species relations between humans activity, the "privatisation" (or theft) by of dollars have been spent on and ETs? Well, as in most areas, if you corporate partners (the "industrial" part unauthorised unconstitutional wear rose-coloured glasses the entire of the military-industrial complex) of . , world looks red. And if you are wearing advanced technologies, the continued projects over the years? military glasses, every new and lying to legally elected and appointed uncontrolled development will be seen leaders and to the public—all of these as a potential or real military threat. and more have contributed to a The nature of such a group—which is psychology of continued secrecy, inordinately controlled and incestuous— because disclosure would expose the greatest scandal in recorded _ is that it is homogenous in world view and mindset. Power and history. control are pre-eminent qualities. Such extreme secrecy creates a very For example, how would the public react to the fact that the dangerous milieu in which checks and balances, give and take, are degradation of the entire Earth's ecosystem and the irretrievable loss of utterly lacking. And in such an environment, very dangerous thousands of species of plants and animals now extinct due to decisions can be made with inadequate feedback, discussion or insight pollution has been utterly unnecessary—and could have been avoided _ from needed perspectives which are, perforce, excluded. if only an honest release of this information had occurred in the We have found that, in such an environment of extreme secrecy, 1950s? militarism and paranoia, immensely dangerous actions have been How would society react to the knowledge that trillions of dollars taken against the ETs. Indeed, we have multiple inside sources who have been spent on unauthorised, unconstitutional projects over the have described to us the use of increasingly advanced technologies to years? And that these taxpayer dollars have been used by corporate _ track, target and destroy extraterrestrial assets. If there is even a 10 per partners in this secrecy to develop spin-off technologies based on the — cent chance that this is true (I am convinced it is 100 per cent study of ET objects which were later patented and used in highly accurate), we are dealing with a global, diplomatic and social crisis profitable technologies? Not only have the taxpayers been defrauded, — which is utterly out of our control but which puts the entire planet at they have then been made to pay a premium for such breakthroughs risk. which were the result of research paid for by them! And this does not Remember, covert reverse-engineering projects have resulted in address the intellectual property theft of such technologies from the huge quantum leaps forward in technologies that, once applied to ETs. While the basic energy generation and propulsion technologies —_ military systems, could be a real threat to ETs who may be here have been withheld, these corporate partners have profited wildly peacefully. The attempts to rapidly militarise space are likely a result from other breakthroughs and benefits in electronics, miniaturisation of a myopic, militaristic and paranoid view of extraterrestrial projects and related areas. Such covert technology transfers constitute a and intentions. If left unchecked, it can only result in catastrophe. multitrillion-dollar theft of technologies which really should be inthe —_ Indeed this group, no matter how well intentioned, is in urgent need of public domain, since taxpayers have paid for them. And how would the public react to the fact that the multibillion- Continued on page 79 dollar space program, using internal combustion rockets and the like, as been a primitive and an unnecessary experiment, since much more advanced technologies and propulsion systems were in existence before we ever went to the Moon? NASA and related agencies have, ‘or the most part, been as much a victim of this secrecy as has the rest of the government and the public. Only a small, very compartmentalised fraction of NASA people know of the real ET technologies hidden away in these projects. Certainly my uncle, who elped design the lunar module which took Neil Armstrong to the Moon, was as much a victim as any one insofar as he was denied access to these technological breakthroughs. He had to rely on the old hysics and the old internal combustion jet thruster technologies just like everyone else. What a shame. The inescapable reality is this: this secret project, no matter how well intentioned initially, got carried away with its own secret power. It abused this power. It has hijacked our future for 50 years. In fact, the quiet coup d'état of the late 1940s and early 1950s, once exposed, could result in real instability today. How would society react to the knowledge that trillions of dollars have been spent on unauthorised, unconstitutional 60 = NEXUS projects over the years? Continued on page 79 www.nexusmagazine.com AUGUST - SEPTEMBER 2007