/Nexus - 1405 - New Times Magazine/pages/0059/image.png)
Page Content (OCR)
The best we can estimate is that it was then that the entire project Going back to the early 1950s, we have found that the basic became increasingly "black" or unacknowledged. The technology and physics behind these ET spacecraft were discovered compartmentalisation of the project dealing with UFOs was through very intensive reverse-engineering projects. It was precisely exponentially increased by the early 1950s when it was realised what _at this point that the decision was made to increase the secrecy to an it was that these covert projects actually had: devices displaying unprecedented level—one which essentially took the matter out of the physics and energy systems which—if disclosed—would forever alter. ordinary government chain of command and control as we know it. life on Earth. Why? By the Eisenhower era, the UFO/ET projects were increasingly Aside from the possible use of such knowledge by US/UK compartmented away from legal, constitutional, chain-of-command —_ adversaries during the Cold War, it was immediately recognised that oversight and control. these devices were not your dad's Oldsmobile. The basic physics This means that—while we know from witness testimony that behind the energy generation and propulsion systems was such that Eisenhower knew of the ET craft—the president (and similar leaders _ these systems could easily replace all existing energy generation and in the UK and elsewhere) were increasingly left out of the loop. Such __—_ propulsion systems on the Earth—and with them, the entire senior elected and appointed leaders were confronted with (as geopolitical and economic order. Eisenhower called it) a sophisticated military-industrial complex with In the 1950s, there was no great concern over global warming, labyrinthine compartmented projects which were more and more out —_ ecosystem collapse, ozone depletion, rainforest loss, biodiversity of their control and oversight. degradation, etc. In the wake of WWII, what was needed was From direct witness testimony we know that Eisenhower, Kennedy, ___ stability, not a new convulsion of the world economic, technological Carter and Clinton were frustrated in their attempts to penetrate such —_and geopolitical order. Remember: those in control like to stay in projects. This is also true of senior congressional leaders and control. They are risk averse, do not like significant change and do investigators, foreign leaders and UN leadership. not give up control and power easily. This is indeed an equal-opportunity exclusion project. It does not The disclosure of the existence of ETs, with the inevitable matter how high your rank or office: if disclosure related to these new you are not deemed necessary to the technologies soon to follow, would project, you are not going to know change the world forever—and they about it, period. i knew it. This was to be avoided at all Contrary to popular myth, since the By the Eisenhower era, costs. Besides, that was the era of "what 1960s concern over some type of the UFO/ET projects were is good for GM is good for America" and the same would be true of big oil, big coal and the like. The inescapable fact is this: the disclosure of the ET presence would bring with it the certain release of these technologies—and that release would sweep away the entire technological infrastructure of the planet. The changes would be immense—and public panic over the fact that we are increasingly compartmented not alone in the universe has not been a wee major reason for the secrecy. Those in away from legal, constitutional, the know—notwithstanding the in-of- i fantastic tales spun in UFO circles and chain of command oversight on the X-Files—understand that fear of and control . hostile ETs has also not been a significant factor. While there has been continued confusion in some covert circles over the ultimate purpose behind sudden. the ET phenomenon, we know of no knowledgeable insiders who Fifty years later, this is more true now than then. Why? Because regard the ETs as hostile and a threat. avoiding the problem in the 1950s—while convenient at the time— By the 1960s, and certainly by the 1990s, the world was very means that the situation is more tenuous now. For example, world familiar with the concept of space travel, and the popular science- dependence on oil and internal combustion technology is greater now fiction industry had thoroughly indoctrinated the masses with the idea than in 1955. And the world economy is larger by orders of of ETs from far away being a possibility. So why the continued magnitude now, so any change would be exponentially greater—and secrecy? potentially more chaotic. The Cold War is over. People would hardly be shocked to find out And so this is the conundrum: each decade and generation has that we are not alone in the universe (the majority of people already _ passed this problem on to the next, only to find any path but continued believe this—in fact, most people believe that the UFOs are real). secrecy to be more destabilising than it would have been a decade Besides, what could be more shocking than to live through the latter —_ earlier. In a maddening circle of secrecy, delay of disclosure and half of the 20th century with thousands of hydrogen bombs aimed at _ increasing world complexity and dependence on out-dated energy every major city in the world? If we can handle that, surely we can systems, each generation has found itself in a greater squeeze than the handle the idea that ETs are real. one before. As difficult as disclosure would have been in the 1950s, The facile explanations of fear, panic, shock and the like do not disclosure now is even more difficult—and potentially Earth-shaking suffice to justify a level of secrecy so deep that even the president and _in its consequences. his CIA director could be denied access to the information. The technological discoveries of the 1950s resulting from the By the Eisenhower era, the UFO/ET projects were increasingly compartmented away from legal, constitutional, chain-of- “command oversight a ee eee | and conirol. Fifty years later, this is more true now than then. Why? Because avoiding the problem in the 1950s—while convenient at the time— means that the situation is more tenuous now. For example, world dependence on oil and internal combustion technology is greater now than in 1955. And the world economy is larger by orders of magnitude now, so any change would be exponentially greater—and potentially more chaotic. And so this is the conundrum: each decade and generation has passed this problem on to the next, only to find any path but continued secrecy to be more destabilising than it would have been a decade earlier. In a maddening circle of secrecy, delay of disclosure and increasing world complexity and dependence on out-dated energy systems, each generation has found itself in a greater squeeze than the one before. As difficult as disclosure would have been in the 1950s, disclosure now is even more difficult—and potentially Earth-shaking in its consequences. The technological discoveries of the 1950s resulting from the reverse-engineering of extraterrestrial craft could have enabled us to completely transform the world economic, social, technological and environmental situations. That such advancements have been withheld from the public is related to the change-averse nature of the controlling hierarchy at the time—and to this day. And make no mistake: the changes would be immense. Consider: a technology which enables energy generation from the so-called zero-point field and which enables every home, business, factory and A current estimate on technologies Continued secrecy on the UFO subject must be related, then, to ongoing anxiety related to the essential power dynamics of the world and how such a disclosure would impact these. That is, the knowledge related to the UFO/ET phenomenon must have such great potential for changing the status quo that its continued suppression is deemed essential at all costs. 58 = NEXUS www.nexusmagazine.com AUGUST - SEPTEMBER 2007