Nexus - 1401 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page 50 of 81

Page 50 of 81
Nexus - 1401 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

IS BIORESONANCE THE 21 st CENTURY'S NEW MEDICINE? the latter suffering considerable acupuncture according to (Professor) Voll" professional harm as a consequence. (EAV) instrument, that could read the However, he was able to continue his supposed resonance of the substance. The research with a greatly reduced budget, and _ instrument was connected to his computer's in March 1999 presented his findings at modem and the "resonance" emailed to a Cambridge University's Cavendish Physics colleague's computer. The transmitted Laboratory to a hall full of scientists, resonance was downloaded, transmitted including Sir Andrew Huxley, past into a similar instrument and then president of the Royal Society, and the "imprinted" into water on the EAV output physicist Professor Brian Josephson, both plate. The water was given to living Nobel laureates. The audience was subjects who reacted as if they had been therefore presumably able to appreciate his respectively given adrenaline, nicotine or presentation. caffeine. Furthermore, he demonstrated Benveniste initially demonstrated that _ that the emailed resonance of heparin could the physiological effect of adrenaline on influence the clotting of stored blood. biological receptors does not have to wait Although Benveniste's landmark until the blood carried the hormone to them _ research requires independent replication, it under the so-called lock-and-key — should not be forgotten that our ability to mechanism. The effect occurred store the resonance of transmitted sound, instantaneously or at the "speed of light", let alone video, on a piece of ribbon or a affecting all the receptors due to an __ disc was still science fiction when many of adrenaline resonance permeating the body —_us were children. Analysis of the ribbon or fluids. metal disc would not reveal any evidence Benveniste then described how he took — of what was supposedly imprinted on it, as samples of adrenaline, nicotine and an instrument capable of detecting those caffeine, and sequentially placed them on __ resonances is required. the input plate of an electronic instrument It does not take a very large leap in generically referred to as an "electro- comprehension to realise that water with considerable by Michael E. Godfrey, MBBS, FACNEM © ACNEM, April 2004 Introduction he 17th-century French philosopher Descartes so influenced Western scientific medical thinking that nothing is now generally acceptable by allopaths that cannot be measured or proved according to established Cartesian principles. All biological responses were supposedly linked to a "lock-and-key" principle, where reactions could only occur following specific physical stimuli. This became even more entrenched over the past decades with the emphasis on a pharmaceutical treatment for every illness. However, a surprising Internet report earlier this year [2004] concerning the USA government's research into anti- terrorism revealed that research was underway to investigate whether cellphones could be adapted to detect the "resonance" of anthrax spores in the air. The report stated that every protein apparently has its own unique resonance. If this is so, it tends to give credence to what homoeopaths have maintained for over two centuries, namely that tinctures and milk tablets could be somehow imprinted with a potentised memory of a herb, mineral or compound. Their therapies were experiential, albeit hysically unprovable. The exact mechanism whereby omoeopathic remedies supposedly exert their effect has been incomprehensible when tested under orthodox criteria. This included the supposed fact that a resonance or a "memory" can linger on in a solution, long after any atoms of the substance have disappeared. Dr Jacques Benveniste, a French scientist now deceased], had a paper published in Nature [30 June 1988; 333:816-8], demonstrating that water could indeed retain the memory of a substance that could be effectively used to treat allergies. The editor, not understanding Benveniste's methodology, denigrated his paper, with Your &REAT- GRANDFATHER CAME Feo THe ‘pepgescital’ GENERATION... YOUR GRAN FATHER CAME Feow THE Bert’ Gen ERATION... I CAME Feom He ‘Love’ GEWERAT ron. WHAT ARS THE ‘BATTERY GENERATION, NEXUS = 49 Semervi fie DECEMBER 2006 — JANUARY 2007 www.nexusmagazine.com