Nexus - 1302 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

Vaccine Dangers and Vested Interests Continued from page 76 You get one or the other, but not both. About the Interviewer: O: So we come to the level nlaving Jon Rannonort has worked as a freelance inves- About the Interviewer: Jon Rappoport has worked as a freelance inves- tigative reporter for 20 years. He has appeared as a guest on over 200 radio and TV programs, including ABC's Nightline, PBS's Tony Brown's Journal and Hard Copy. For the last 10 years, Jon has operated largely away from the mainstream. Over the last 30 years, his independent research has encompassed deep politics, conspiracies, alternative health, mind control, the medical cartel, symbology, and solutions to the takeover of the planet by hidden elites. In 1996, Jon started The Great Boycott against eight corporate chemical giants: Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, Bayer, Hoechst, Rhéne-Poulenc, Imperial Chemical Industries and Ciba-Geigy. The boycott continues to operate today. A graduate of Amherst College, Massachusetts, with a BA in Philosophy, Jon is sixty-three and lives with his wife, Dr Laura Thompson, in San Diego, California. on's article "School Violence: The Psychiatric Drugs Connection" was published in NEXUS 6/05. His book Oklahoma City Bombing was reviewed in NEXUS 3/02. lon Rappoport can be contacted by email at rappoportjon@hotmail.com or via his website, http://www.nomorefakenews.com. You get one or the other, but not both. Q: So we come to the level playing field. A: Yes. Allow those who want the vac- cines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information. Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots. A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad par- enting. You fight that with better informa- tion. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his[/her] mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is bet- ting that the fear will win. A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every State, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move. Q: And yet there are children every- where who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy. A: The operative word is "appear". What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. NEXUS +77 FEBRUARY — MARCH 2006 www.nexusmagazine.com