Nexus - 1302 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

The "Internal" versus "External" Security Threat by On the other hand, extraterrestrials that have not entered into Visiting Extraterrestrials such technology exchange agreements with secret government There is intense debate over whether extraterrestrials—com- authorities have behaved in ways that display great respect monly described as "Grays" from the Zeta Reticuli star system— towards individuals they have contacted. This is evidenced in the involved in abductions and other intrusive activities, as outlined extensive number of "contactee" or "space brother" reports from by Corso, have a covert "take-over" agenda. Researchers such as the 1950s right up to today. These extraterrestrials that typically Dr David Jacobs (author of The Threat) believe the Grays have a look human in appearance reflect great respect for human free covert plan to take over human society by engineering a superior _ will and follow what appears to be a clear directive of non- hybrid race. On the other hand, researchers such as [the late] Dr —_ interference in human affairs. Extraterrestrials that are trying to John Mack (author of Passport to the Cosmos) believe the star assist humanity, as described by these alleged contactees, are visitors have a "transformative" agenda designed to blend together secretly being targeted by space weapons in order to capture their the best characteristics of extraterrestrials and humans. While this technology or the EBEs themselves. This also includes Grays is an important debate, it glosses over one of the key features of | from Zeta Reticuli who are involved in abductions and have the extraterrestrial presence: classified agreements between reached agreements with the secret government. It appears that extraterrestrials and the "secret government". In considering the __ the relationship between the Grays and the "secret government" is "transformative" versus "take-over" debate, it is vital to consider a complex one: some whistleblowers report on military all the data and come up with a nuanced response that takes into confrontations between them in terms of the extent to which either account different extraterrestrial races performing various activi- or both have violated the provisions of their secret agreements.” ties. Visiting extraterrestrials need to be distinguished on the basis of their being either inside or outside the secret network of agreements reached In short, what has emerged over with the "secret government” the last 50 years or so is the The key policy issue is not whether we should establish communication creation of an "extraterrestrial with extraterrestrials to resolve differ- enemy" that justifies the ences that lead to confrontations over the number of abductions or other development and deployment of intrusive activities reported by Corso space weapons according to ’ and others, but the precise nature of _ ae the agreements reached with extrater- Corso and other military officials. restrials and how these are conducted in a covert and unaccountable man- extraterrestrial vehicles through the ner. As far as the abduction phenome- deployment of space-based and other non is concerned, it is very likely that these abductions have been advanced weapon systems. As Hellyer pointed out in his made possible by, or accelerated as a result of, covert agreements September 2005 speech: "Are they really enemies or merely by secret government authorities with one or more extraterrestrial legitimate explorers from afar?" Conclusion: The Use of Space Weapons is an Inappropriate Policy for Extraterrestrial Visitors With regard to the deployment of space weapons, the deliberate target- ing of extraterrestrial visitors needs to be exposed. This requires legisla- tive officials in the US and elsewhere to be briefed so that a more appropri- ate policy response can be developed. There is a need to put a halt to the current US policy of targeting civilisations. Consequently, the national security threat posed by What makes this policy issue complex from the perspective of extraterrestrials is a covert one that exists through the classified whistleblowers such as Corso—who is representative of many agreements established by the secret government with some military officials briefed about the extraterrestrial presence—is extraterrestrial races. that they believe that the weaponisation of space is appropriate. The motivations of extraterrestrials that have entered into these _— This policy is justified, in the view of Corso and other military agreements are very questionable and give considerable cause for _ officials, on the basis of the intrusive activities of extraterrestrials. suspicion as to their overall intent. Certainly, the great number of The abduction phenomenon and related intrusive activities nee: abductions that have occurred gives rise to the "take-over" sce- to be understood in terms of the highly classified agreements nario promoted by Dr Jacobs and other researchers. Once one reached between the "secret government" and extraterrestrials. It considers the vast secret infrastructure created to develop extrater- should be pointed out that it does not appear that military of! restrial technologies, and the illicit funding required, it becomes such as Corso were briefed about friendly extraterrestrials an clear that the national security threat posed by extraterrestrials is their non-intrusive activities. Instead, Corso was given informa- Ss internal rather than external. Corso's depiction of extraterrestri- tion on abduction-related activities and other extraterrestrial intru- als as an external military threat to the United States is therefore sions that led to the psychological framework for the creation of not accurate. "enemy images". This process is described by Sam Keen in Extraterrestrials that have entered into agreements with secret Faces of the Enemy, which clearly outlines how the creation of government authorities are complicit in the creation of a national enemy images has been a vital aspect of fighting successfu security system based on secrecy, unaccountability and illicit wars.” In short, what has emerged over the last 50 years or so is funding. This directly threatens US national security both in the creation of an "extraterrestrial enemy" that justifies the devel- terms of a covert take-over by extraterrestrials and an erosion of | opment and deployment of space weapons, according to Corso the constitutional principles upon which the US is based. The real and other military officials. national security threat posed by some extraterrestrial visitors is a This takes us to the warnings of Dr Carol Rosin, a former result of the desire of the secret government to acquire and devel- spokeswoman for Dr Werner von Braun, about a contrived op extraterrestrial technologies at any cost, even if it means giving extraterrestrial threat being the basis of a public disclosure of the permission to a limited number of abductions and other intrusive _ extraterrestrial presence.* Such a contrived threat would direct actions. public perceptions towards regarding extraterrestrials as unfriendly On the other hand, extraterrestrials that have not entered into such technology exchange agreements with secret government authorities have behaved in ways that display great respect towards individuals they have contacted. This is evidenced in the extensive number of "contactee" or "space brother" reports from the 1950s right up to today. These extraterrestrials that typically look human in appearance reflect great respect for human free will and follow what appears to be a clear directive of non- interference in human affairs. Extraterrestrials that are trying to assist humanity, as described by these alleged contactees, are secretly being targeted by space weapons in order to capture their technology or the EBEs themselves. This also includes Grays from Zeta Reticuli who are involved in abductions and have reached agreements with the secret government. It appears that the relationship between the Grays and the "secret government" is a complex one: some whistleblowers report on military confrontations between them in terms of the extent to which either or both have violated the provisions of their secret agreements.” In short, what has emerged over the last 50 years or so is the creation of an “extraterrestrial not accurate. Extraterrestrials that have entered into agreements with secret government authorities are complicit in the creation of a national security system based on secrecy, unaccountability and illicit funding. This directly threatens US national security both in terms of a covert take-over by extraterrestrials and an erosion of the constitutional principles upon which the US is based. The real national security threat posed by some extraterrestrial visitors is a result of the desire of the secret government to acquire and devel- op extraterrestrial technologies at any cost, even if it means giving permission to a limited number of abductions and other intrusive actions. NEXUS = 59 FEBRUARY — MARCH 2006 www.nexusmagazine.com