Nexus - 1103 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

NB: Please keep lett .. more Letters to the Editor “sis>"= Letters to the Editor more [Dear Rance: One of the rea -| days later, about 1-2 hours later | one was new to me. Umimo case a hoax. I would not sons we published the Genesis | than the time of the first ad I saw | I looked up the website given, | be so quick to write this off, World Energy material was to | on Channel 7. It was broadcast | and found that both that and the | based on your criteria above. It try to entice further information | around 4.30 to 5.30 pm, in one of | earlier ones were now defunct; | is often by airing information on on the matter from amongst our | the advertising slots. The second | but I did turn up this website, | cases like this one that new many readers. We remain curi -| occasion, it was broadcast some | http://www.strangemag.com/ | information comes to light. ous and yet still hopeful that, one | time between 6.30 and 7.30pm. | ummo.html, which seems to | There is no new information at day, someone will successfully | 1 was watching these two ads in | explain very comprehensively | those websites to which you make a non-polluting energy sys -| Adelaide. I was horrified to see | the whole lot as an experiment | refer. Ed.] tem freely available to all. Ed.] | it the first time; I almost doubted | that unexpectedly fooled a whole my eyes, thinking I had to be | group of people before it finally Bill of Rights NEXUS Banned in Vic Prisons? hallucinating to see such an obvi- | petered out (as far as I am 9 “| ous propaganda job. aware). happy to receive the latest But when I saw the same ad The names, dates and back- NEXUS issue, Feb-March 2004 | 282i on Channel 7, I was dis- | ground the article gives seem 2 . sted that someone thinks that tty hard to refute, and after [11/02]. Obviously, the authori- guste . ae ; pretty 0 .? . we, the ordinary citizens, are so | expecting a pretty impressive stupid that we wouldn't ask any | Ummo site the last thing I : questions about what we were | expected was an admission! Please can we see something shown in such a public domain | | don't know if the editor and | 20ut the Bill of Rights of 1689? as TV that not only adults but | writer had read and dismissed | Everyone, especially politicians also kids are watching. this article, but, if they had, I'd | i" Australia and New Zealand, Also, there was a news item on | like to know the grounds they seems to make EXCUSES for the issues sent to me via the mail 15 January about Mt Aso in | used to give more credit to the | T4S0"S they don't want us to oe . southern Japan erupting. This | Ummites, who appear to have have guns, and when the Bill of When the Iraq War egan, T | news clip was shown all through | gone quiet, judging from their Rights 1689 is mentioned, or our was informed that your publica | the day on different channels. It | lack of web presence. right to be armed for our protec- Hon er amie famed is shovel the mouna, aad Me Op an nelaed sujet, which | Aco hey ma Mind you, I'm yet to read any smoke was furiously coming out | T would recommend as important ‘Amendment memo detailing this. from the mouth of the volcano. | for NEXUS investigation, is the . ee . . ..,_ | It was a nice, sunny day when | total lack of enthusiasm by the The US Bill of Rights came Reading between the lines, it's they shot this clip, whenever | media for Dr Steven Greer's | Straight from the Bill of Rights obvious that our government they did. Disclosure Project, now that the 1689, but, to make sure their wishes to suppress information The thing is, I checked with | full report has been out for a rea- Rights were safe, they made their that challenges the satus quo, Japanese people as to how the | sonable time [see NEXUS 9/01]. | Version of the old Bill. wet for them to do ° ethane a situation was going yesterday | J have only read extracts so far, | It is very obvious to anyone ' n SO. naps and today [16 January], and sur- | but am surprised the powers- who has read it in full that every - taste of things to come in the prisingly found out that the news | that-be are able to treat it in the | ‘Ming in the Bill of Rights 1689 is Hi: I think the magazine is great, but some things seem over the top. I keep an open mind, however, because we just don't know for sure what is going on, do we? Apart from the obvious. Dear Duncan: I was very ties here at the prison where I'm located have deemed the latest issue "non-threatening" to the accepted world reality. I subscribed to NEXUS a year ago, and have only been allowed to receive at least half of the wider world? : is completely false. Mt Fuji is | same dismissive manner as the | Still fully legal, today and into I haven't decide whether or | starting to wake up, but there average UFO report, which the the future, and it cannot be not I will renew my subscription, | was no news about Mt Aso writ- Project certainly isn't. repealed, amended, revoked or but please keep doing what you | ten on Internet. If you can find a reporter to do modified, now or ever. are doing, as your printed Maybe it means that the clip | a follow-up on the (non) | The People of Oz and NZ are Statement of Purpose indicates. | was used in MI6 style to send an response to the Project a year or | not fully aware of the Bill of Most appreciative yo important message to someone, | two on, this would be highly | Rights 1689, and that our Rights P. D., Victoria, Australia which may involve Japan. | yseful. are still legally recognised by the Whatever is happening, it must Sorry to be the bearer of bad Bill. Subliminals, False Clips on TV | ¢ @ big thing for them to contact | tidings about Ummo, but I) Why is it, then, that our gov- agents in such manner public. thought it was better to pass this | ernments keep all this from us I'm just hoping it is nothing to do | oy than ignore it. and treat us like crims? with a nuclear plant meltdown or | 7 always have an open mind | Thank you for your time. something equivalent. when I follow up articles, or I | Best wishes, Thanks for reading on! wouldn't continue to buy | Paul F. McCourt, Turangi, New Dear Duncan: Thank you for your fantastic magazines. I get withdrawal symptoms if I don't get to read your magazine every issue these days. Letters to the Editor last issue "L", Australia NEXUS regularly. Zealand [11/01] had a letter informing Yours faithfully, [Dear Paul: We are planning about the propaganda advertise- | Ummo Hoax and Disclosure David Howard, London, UK to publish an article on Common ment shown on Channel 7| Dear all: I was fascinated by | [Dear David: The websites | Law in a forthcoming issue, and [Australia]. I saw it, too! And | the recent Ummo article [11/02], | quoted are still up as far as I can | this will also include discussion not only that time, as they broad- | and as a bit of a researcher | see, and nowhere is there a satis -| on the Bill of Rights. Stay tuned. cast the same advertisement two | myself I had to admit that this | factory explanation to prove the | Ed.] APRIL — MAY 2004 NEXUS <5 www.nexusmagazine.com