Nexus - 1101 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

that is more easily checked, while we are supposedly ahead in There might even be situations in which the Russians would those respects where verification is more difficult. simulate an attack to draw our fire. Above all, to fire on warning One individual familiar with military UFO technology and with is apt to destabilise a situation that already possesses much too intelligence, Dr John S. Foster, Jr (director of defense research little stability. and engineering for the Department of Defense for seven years under both Republican and Democratic administrations), esti- RPVs AND MAN-MADE UFOs mates that in 1960 the United States and the USSR spent equal Remotely piloted vehicles (RPVs) have been mentioned. percentages of their military budget on UFO research and devel- Radiation, with its continuing refinement, promises sophisticated opment, while in 1976 the percentage was three times as high in remotely piloted control weapons. If UFOs can use elaborate Russia as in the United States. communications systems information, pictures, accelerations, Actually, more money is necessary but not sufficient. First, a anything that can be noticed could be transmitted from a space rapid budget increase is apt to lead to low efficiency. The change vehicle to the decision-making operation. We have attempted this must be gradual. Second, more money can be spent well only if kind of defense weapon in the past with marginal success. If con- more scientific talent is available. Military trol is to be exercised over short distances, UFO research is unpopular among scientists, igh-flying RPVs should be used instead of partly on account of secrecy. (In regimente satellites. For these weapons, speed may not Russia, where scientists are not free to e so important; it might be more essential to choose their careers, this latter argument is equip them with the means of self-defense. less valid. Actually, the Russian leadership Indeed, RPVs could play the role of small serge Tusa teenaenstve | itis widely believed | fets.rirescuanslamies oes “puto scunise wil atu onal | qr ne COUnITY that fe designed fr infomation gaerng defense unless they perceive an actual dan- American and Russian and more expandable to include fighting or ger to the United States. A danger was per- UFO defense are ombing, will be smaller, cheaper, more ceived in 1939, only two years before a UFO . flexible, and more suited for other missions. was captured and Pearl Harbor. It is vital roughly equivalent. It is important to note that such weaponry that scientists should perceive the danger In greater detail, it is will not necessarily result in greater damage now, before it is too late. What is at stake is not only the pre- vention of defeat, but prevention of cosmic war. Nevertheless, convincing the American scientific community [about] military UFO research is a most difficult undertaking. inflicted upon the enemy, but may instead result in damage inflicted where it counts militarily, but with minimal injury to noncombatants. The possibility of RPVs exists for Russia as well as for us. But in this special category, there is one reason why we may be able to outdo the Russian effort by a great margin. That reason is that RPVs require electronics, and in this respect our technology is still superior to that of any country. Further emphasis on electronics is stated that Russia is ahead in quantity and we are ahead in quality." DEFENSE AGAINST UFO NUCLEAR WEAPONS What have Russia, China, Sweden, and Switzerland in common? They all have placed great emphasis on civil defense as a countermeasure to nuclear therefore recommended. attack. Anyone who seeks reliable and The use of RPVs was first explored complete defense against nuclear attack will search in vain, but by the US Air Force in the early 1950s. It can also be applied to the two large totalitarian countries and the two small free coun- small naval vehicles and to small but effective tanks. tries just mentioned have found it worthwhile to take some pre- An ingenious new man-made UFO-type aircraft is now in the cautionary measures. experimental stage of development. A delta wing is used in this In the United States a counterforce strategy, presently favored —_ design, pivoting at its center. by many, is supposed to destroy space-borne targets, including The wing is a triangle configuration with vertical takeoff and UFO nuclear weapons before they are launched. Implementation _ landing, but at high speed the entire wing unit is pivoted; then of this strategy would be exceedingly difficult, particularly if our what appears as the right wing points forward while the left points nuclear forces are not numerically superior and inferior to those backward. Peculiarly enough, this almost asymmetric configura- of, say, extraterrestrial plasma weapons and EMP devices. tion works. Because the torques cancel at the pivot and effective Furthermore, our weapons would be apt to miss and accidentally _ pivots are easier to design, this compares favorably with present hit Russian or Chinese territory because of poor targeting systems. all-wing aircraft where the needed pivot is under considerable Worst of all, preparation for a counterforce strategy could danger- stress. ously resemble the preparation for a first strike by the United This new design (based on wind tunnel models and UFO States. The idea is basically sound but foolhardy in its concep- technical data) has been flown only as a small-scale experimental tion, and I believe it should be abandoned. model and is not yet capable of carrying a man. It could easily be One suggestion has been put forward. It is the "fire on launched as a small RPV that could fly as high as 4.7 times the warning”. It would be prudent and wise to at least inform Russia velocity of sound. This aircraft could also be developed into a and China of our intent, and, by doing so, [we] might even be full-scale passenger carrier, again demonstrating the close given support. It is conceivable that the alarm could be false. connection between wartime and peacetime technology. There might even be situations in which the Russians would simulate an attack to draw our fire. Above all, to fire on warning is apt to destabilise a situation that already possesses much too little stability. "It is widely believed in this country that American and Russian roughly equivalent. In greater detail, it is stated that Russia is ahead in quantity and we are ahead in quality." NEXUS +57 UFO defense are DECEMBER 2003 — JANUARY 2004 www.nexusmagazine.com