Nexus - 1101 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

If the windings Figure 1 on either side of the central magnet, US. Patent Jun. 12,2001 Sheet 11 0f32 US 6,246,561 B1 which are normally connected in series, are properly pulsed, the field of the permanent magnet in the cen- tre will be diverted ver Fig. 16 B to the opposite side of the core flux 1.75 times more force is delivered to the legs of the core path provided. Or, than is provided by the electrical input to the control coils. in alternative lan- guage, the side of the core that is pulsed is shown not to be the case. In this instance, demagnetised, relative to the field of the the pulse is centrally located and a dual permanent magnet used in the apparatus. flux field layout employed which both This is elementary textbook physics that demagnetises the core relative to one mag- anyone can understand. net and magnetises it relative to the other. So what is surprising about this Since the two actions are complementary, apparently simple apparatus is that the the input required to manifest the flux armature on the side of the flux core will switching effect is halved, therefore dou- contain 1.75 times more units of magnetic _ bling "efficiency". force than could be manifested by the It should be noted that while the electrical input to the apparatus alone. efficiency is doubled, the absolute output Since the ability to move force may not be significantly improved. This is arbitrarily from one point to another is the because the major weakness of this effect basis for motion or work, however and technology is flux saturation of the simplistic, we therefore have a basis fora core, with values depending upon the system that can be developed for practical specific properties of the B-H curve of the technological purposes. core material employed, limiting absolute Expressed in alternative language, we output of both layouts the same. also have the capability to engineer a time- The previous statements are not require varying magnetic field, without the need for to be taken on trust; simple experiments moving parts, which will allow develop- have been proposed by Joe Flynn, such that ment of systems that output electrical anyone can validate this effect for energy. Both capa- bilities are highly Figure 2 desirable and offer substantial oppor- | U-S. Patent Jun. 12,2001 Sheet 30 of 32 US 6,246,561 B1 tunity for technical development. Expanding upon this basic experi- ment, there is a second simple and logical improve- ment in layout, illustrated in Fig. 45Z Figure 2, which 3.47 times more force is delivered to the legs of the core should be obvious than is provided by the electrical input to the control coils. but has been - JOE FLYNN'S PARALLEL PATH MAGNETIC TECHNOLOGY Jun. 12, 2001 here is a widespread opinion com- mon to the mainstream academic community and also to various alter- native scientific forums that some kind of exotic new physics will be required to design and implement over-unity technolo- gies—that is to say, electrical motors, elec- trical generators or other apparatus which produce an excess of magnetic force or energy above the value actually inputted. However, this has recently been experi- mentally demonstrated not to be the case, as I have validated myself in simple $20 experiments undertaken at home with parts bought from the local hardware store. It is the purpose of this article to educate readers that, with care, thought and a little work, it can be demonstrated that existing textbook physics law freely allows for the extraction of excess electrical energy from magnetic systems. The credit for this groundbreaking research goes to Joe Flynn, who has been engaged in magnetic flux research for over 25 years now. His work is longstanding, comprehensive and, in later years, well funded. It is reported that US$7 million has been spent to date, with over $1 million alone put into developing a revolutionary high-performance magnetic motor. His equipment is validated, and apparently is already in mass production for selected customers. Since many lines of research have been formulated and explored by Joe Flynn, the following article presents only a brief sum- mary of some of his best apparatus, but is nonetheless sufficient to convey the basic ideas and provide a framework within which one can undertake experiments. Fig. 16 B 1.75 times more force is delivered to the legs of the core than is provided by the electrical input to the control coils. Jun. 12, 2001 Sheet 30 of 32 Principles of Operation Figure | is taken from Joe Flynn's US Patent No. 6,246,561, awarded on June 12, 2001, and filed on July 31, 1998. It explains a simple magnetic-force multipli- cation experiment, which forms the basis for the Flynn magnetic art. NEXUS = 39 by Tim Harwood, MA © 2003 DECEMBER 2003 — JANUARY 2004 www.nexusmagazine.com