Nexus - 1002 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

around 3.2 million years ago. Recent discoveries show signs apes, at least a few are walking upright as far back as 10 to 15 of pushing bipedal locomotion back as far as 6.0 million years million years ago. If we accept that likelihood, we finally ago. So let's assume for the sake of discussion that some make sense of the deep past while beginning for the first time primates were upright at no less than 4.0 million years ago. to see ourselves clearly. Thus, from approximately 4.0 million years ago all the way We can be sure that at least four of the 50 Miocene apes to the appearance of Cro-Magnons some time before 120,000 were on their way to becoming modern quadrupeds, because years ago (95% of the journey), all pre-human fossils reveal their descendants live among us today. Equally certain is that distinctly non-human characteristics. They have thick, robust others of those 50 walked out of the Miocene on two legs. bones—much thicker and more robust than ours. Such thick Technically these are called hominoids, which are human-like ones are necessary to support the stress generated by beings that are clearly not human. In fact, every bipedal fossil extraordinarily powerful muscles, far more powerful than ours. preceding Cro-Magnon is considered a hominoid—a term that Their arms are longer than ours, especially sounds distinctly outside the human lin- from shoulder to elbow. Their arms are eage. So Darwinists have replaced it in also roughly the same length as their legs, common usage with the much less specific ala Miocene apes. And in every aspect "pre-human", which not so subtly brain- that can be quantified—every one!—their washes us all into believing there is no skulls are much more ape-like than The chasm between doubt about that connection. And that human-like. Those differences hold from brainwashing works. Neanderthals—which means. that | CFO-Magnons (us) and | steno bipedal apes alive inthe world something quite dramatic happened to everything else that today, despite hundreds of sightings and/or Rett ornertincionevens | Omes before them is | sre 9s dar sac was...something else. so Incredl y wide Darwinists brainwash us to ignore such The chasm between Cro-Magnons (us) reports by showering them with ridicule. and everything else that comes before and deep that there They call such creatures "impossible", and them is so incredibly wide and deep that there is no way legitimately to connect the two, apart from linking their bipedal locomotion. All of the so-called "pre-humans" are much more like upright-walking chimps or upright-walking gorillas than they are incipient humans. Darwinists argue that this is why they are called pre-humans, because they are so clearly not human. But another interpretation can be put on the fossil record—one that fairly and impartially judges the facts is no way legitimately to connect the two, apart from linking their bipedal locomotion. hope the weight of their credentials can hold reality at bay long enough for them to figure out what to do about the public relations catastrophe they will face when the first hominoid is brought onto the world stage—dead or alive. That will be the darkest day in Darwinist history, because their long charade will be officially over. The truth will finally be undeniable. Bigfoot, the Abominable Snowman and severa relatives are absolutely real. as they exist, without the "spin" IF THE SHOE FITS... required by Darwinist dogma. That spin says that the gaping I'm not going to waste time and space here going over the physiological chasm between Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons mountain of evidence that is available in support of hominoi can be plausibly explained with yet another "missing link". reality. I cover it extensively in the third part of my book, Everything You Know Is Wrong, and there are many other LOOKING BACK TO SEE AHEAD books that cover one or more aspects of the subject. If you Darwinists use the missing link to negate the fact that Cro- care to inform yourself about the reality of hominoids, you Magnons appear out of nowhere, looking nothing like won't have any trouble doing so. And the evidence is soli anything that has come before. What they fail to mention is enough to hold up in any court in the world, except the court that dozens of such links would be needed to show any kind of — of public opinion manipulated by terrified Darwinists. plausible transition from any pre-human to Cro-Magnons. It However, I will go over a few points that bear directly on the clearly didn't happen—and since they're experts about such question of human origins. things, they know it didn't happen. However, to acknowledge Let's grant a fairly obvious assumption: that the thousands that would play right into the desperate hands of Creationists of ordinary people who have described hominoid sightings and and Intelligent Designers, not to mention give strong support encounters over the past few hundred years (yes, they go back to Interventionists like me. They face a very big rock or a very that far in the literature) were in fact seeing living creatures hard place. rather than Miocene ghosts. And no matter where on Earth Let's accept for the moment that in Darwinian terms there is witnesses come from, no matter how far from the beaten path no way to account for the sudden appearance of Cro-Magnons of education and/or modern communications, they describe (humans) on planet Earth. If that is true, then what about the what they see with amazing consistency. To hear witnesses so-called "pre-humans"? What are they the ancestors of? tell it, the same kinds of creatures exist in every heavily forest- Their bones litter the fossil record looking very unlike humans, ed or canopied environment on the planet—which is precisely yet they clearly walk upright for at least 4.0 million years, and what we would expect if they did indeed stride out of the new finds threaten to push that back to 6.0 million years. Even Miocene epoch on two legs. more likely is that among the 50 or more species of Miocene Furthermore, what witnesses describe is exactly what we Cro-Magnons (us) and everything else that comes before them is so incredibly wide and deep that there is no way legitimately to connect the two, apart from linking their bipedal locomotion. LOOKING BACK TO SEE AHEAD Darwinists use the missing link to negate the fact that Cro- Magnons appear out of nowhere, looking nothing like anything that has come before. What they fail to mention is that dozens of such links would be needed to show any kind of plausible transition from any pre-human to Cro-Magnons. It clearly didn't happen—and since they're experts about such things, they know it didn't happen. However, to acknowledge that would play right into the desperate hands of Creationists and Intelligent Designers, not to mention give strong support to Interventionists like me. They face a very big rock or a very hard place. Let's accept for the moment that in Darwinian terms there is no way to account for the sudden appearance of Cro-Magnons (humans) on planet Earth. If that is true, then what about the so-called "pre-humans"? What are they the ancestors of? Their bones litter the fossil record looking very unlike humans, yet they clearly walk upright for at least 4.0 million years, and new finds threaten to push that back to 6.0 million years. Even more likely is that among the 50 or more species of Miocene 50 + NEXUS The chasm between | www.nexusmagazine.com FEBRUARY — MARCH 2003