Nexus - 0904 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

paring. Again, maybe those stone "tools" were not only for 1990). Her work is remarkable. And for a more in-depth discus- butchering animals. sion of the mysteries within our genes and those of domesticated Skulls. The human skull is nothing like the primate skull. plants and animals, see Everything You Know Is Wrong. There is hardly any fair morphological comparison to be made, apart from the general parts being the same. Their design and BREAKING RANKS assembly are so radically different as to make attempts at compar- When all of the above is taken together—the inexplicable ison useless. puzzles presented by domesticated plants, domesticated animals Brains. The comparison here is even more radical because and humans—it is clear that Darwin cannot explain it, modern human brains are so vastly different. (To say "improved" or _ scientists cannot explain it, not Creationists nor Intelligent Design "superior" is unfair and not germane, because primate brains work — proponents. None of them can explain it, because it is not perfectly well for what primates have to do to live and reproduce.) explainable in only Earthbound terms. Locomotion. The comparison here is easily as wide as the We will not answer these questions with any degree of satisfac- comparison of brains and skulls. Humans are bipedal; primates tion until our scientists open their minds and squelch their egos are quadrupeds. That says more than enough. enough to acknowledge that they do not, in fact, know much Speech. Human throats are completely redesigned relative to about their own backyard. Until that happens, the truth will primate throats. The larynx has dropped to a much lower posi- —_ remain obscured. tion, so humans can break typical primate sounds into the tiny My personal opinion, which is based on a great deal of indepen- pieces of sound (by modulation) that have come to be human dent research in a wide range of disciplines relating to human ori- speech. gins, is that ultimately Charles Darwin will be best known for his Sex. Primate females have oestrous cycles and are sexually observation that humans are essentially like domesticated animals. receptive only at special times. Human females have no oestrous I believe that what Darwin observed with his own eyes and cycle in the primate sense. They are continually receptive to sex. research is the truth, and that modern scientists would see it as (Unless, of course, they have the clearly as he did if only they had the proverbial headache!) motivation or the courage to seek it Chromosomes. This is the most out. But for now, they don't...so, inexplicable difference of all. Primates Primates have 48 until then, we can only poke and prod have 48 chromosomes. Humans are h at them in the hope of some day considered vastly superior to them in a chromosomes. getting them to notice our complaints wide array of areas, yet somehow we Humans are considered and address them. In order to poke have only 46 chromosomes! This begs . . and prod successfully, more people the question of how we could lose two vastly superior to them in have to be alerted to the fact that full chromosomes—which represents a a wide array of areas, another scientific fraud is being lot of DNA—in the first place, and in perpetrated. the process become so much better. yet somehow we have Future editions of Icons of Nothing about it makes logical sense. only 46 chromosomes! Evolution will discuss the current era Genetic Disorders. As with all wild when scientists ridiculed, ignored or animals (plants, too), primates have simply refused to deal with a small relatively few genetic disorders spread mountain of direct, compelling evi- throughout their gene pools. Albinism is dence that outside intervention has one that is common to many animal groups as well as humans. clearly been at work in the genes of domesticated plants, animals But albinism does not stop an animal with it from growing up and and humans. You Know What has left traces of their handiwork assing the gene for it into the gene pool. Mostly, though, serious all over our bodies, all through our gene pools. All that will be lefects are quickly weeded out in the wild. Often, parents or oth- —_ required for the truth to come out is for a few "insiders" to break ers in a group will do the job swiftly and surely, so wild gene __ ranks with their brainwashed peers. ools stay relatively clear. In contrast, humans have over 4,000 Look to the younger generation. Without mortgages to pay, genetic disorders, and several of those will absolutely kill every families to raise and retirements to prepare for, they can find the victim before reproduction is possible. This begs the question of courage to act on strong convictions. Don't expect it of anyone iow such defects could possibly get into the human gene pool in over forty, possibly even thirty. But somewhere in the world, the the first place, much less how they remain so widespread. men and women have been born who will take Darwinism down Genetic Relatedness. A favourite Darwinist statistic is that the and replace it with the truth. total genome (all the DNA) of humans differs from chimpanzees The fat lady is nowhere in sight, but that doesn't mean she's not y only 1% and from gorillas by 2%. This makes it seem as if suiting up. oo evolution is indeed correct and that humans and primates are vir- tually kissing cousins. However, what they don't stress is that 1% | About the Author: of the human genome's three billion base pairs is 30 million base Lloyd Pye, born in 1946 in Louisiana, USA, is a researcher, airs—and to any You Know What that can adroitly manipulate author, novelist and scriptwriter. His independent studies over genes, 30 million base pairs can easily add up to a tremendous _ more than three decades into all aspects of evolution have con- amount of difference. vinced him that humans did not evolve on Earth, or at least are Everything Else. The above are the larger categories at issue the product of extraterrestrial intervention. His book, in the discrepancies between primates and humans. There are Everything You Know Is Wrong — Book One: Human Origins, dozens more listed as sub-categories below one or more of these. is available by ordering through http:/Avww.iUniverse.com or To delve deeper into these fascinating mysteries, check The — Barnes & Noble at http:/Awww.bn.com. Visit Lloyd Pye's web- Scars of Evolution by Elaine Morgan (Oxford University Press, _ site at http://www.lloydpye.com. 1990). Her work is remarkable. And for a more in-depth discus- sion of the mysteries within our genes and those of domesticated plants and animals, see Everything You Know Is Wrong. chromosomes. Humans are considered vastly superior to them in a wide array of areas, r,s Se yet somehow we have only 46 chromosomes! About the Author: Lloyd Pye, born in 1946 in Louisiana, USA, is a researcher, author, novelist and scriptwriter. His independent studies over more than three decades into all aspects of evolution have con- vinced him that humans did not evolve on Earth, or at least are the product of extraterrestrial intervention. His book, Everything You Know Is Wrong — Book One: Human Origins, is available by ordering through http:/Avww.iUniverse.com or Barnes & Noble at http://www.bn.com. Visit Lloyd Pye's web- site at http:/Awww.lloydpye.com. JUNE - JULY 2002 NEXUS ¢ 59 Primates have 48 www.nexusmagazine.com