Nexus - 0804 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

NEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCENEWSCIENCE I won't belabour the explanation of aether/ZPE with all the information avail- able on the Net, but I do want to make one other point. Nature seeks equilibrium. When equilibrium is disturbed, it produces polarisation, a separation into two distinct forces: a positive-pressure wave and a neg- ative-vacuum wave, both of which seek to rejoin in order to achieve an equilibrium that matches the ambient environment. Whenever you have polarities, you have a gradient for each polarity. This gradient can be thought of as having the greatest intensity on the outside of the wave where it is furthest from the ambient zero reference. I won't belabour the explanation of To my view and in my communications aether/ZPE with all the information avail- with many others, nothing could be further able on the Net, but I do want to make one from the truth. No one with whom I have other point. Nature seeks equilibrium. communicated has ever suggested that When equilibrium is disturbed, it produces energy was being created. Instead, many polarisation, a separation into two distinct _ of us believe it is possible to extract energy forces: a positive-pressure wave and aneg- from the repulsion/attraction of magnetism, ative-vacuum wave, both of which seek to from gravity and from the omnipresent rejoin in order to achieve an equilibrium —aether/ZPE. that matches the ambient environment. But let us not limit our seeking to just Whenever you have polarities, you have three sources, but expand it to include any a gradient for each polarity. This gradient energy or force gradient, knowing that the can be thought of as having the greatest olarities, when placed in the proper intensity on the outside of the wave where arrangement, must combine to create the it is furthest from the ambient zero _ natural condition of equilibrium. reference. As the polarities move to recombine, we intend to guide them through the wheel- work of our machinery to do practical work. It also might be possible to tap into the force that causes the equilibrium dis- "Computers in the future ruption in the first place, since there is an may weigh no more than expansion and a collapse cycle to any equi- " librium disturbance. 1.5 tons. . Irreversible Entropy and Closed — Popular Mechanics, 1949 Systems Py The two major errors made by modern science is sticking to the belief in the first and second "laws" of thermodynamics. can prevent the passage of aether/ZPE and gravity into the so-called "closed" system; ergo, additional forces from outside the box, and which pass into and through the box, are necessarily injecting extra energy inside the box, which can be intercepted and converted to add energy to the closed tam system. Can anyone deny that gravity permeates the box? If it did not, the box would float off into space with nothing to hold it down. Would it not follow that an aether/ZPE would also permeate the closed system? We must learn to convert or translate that additional energy (aether/ZPE, gravity, whatever) into a form that we can use, i.e., "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." — Marshal Ferdinand Foch French Commander of Allied Forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918 "Airplanes are interesting toys but of no military value." "Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons." — Marshal Ferdinand Foch French Commander of Allied Forces during the closing months of World War I, 1918 "The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." — Western Union memo, 1876 Gravity decreases as you ascend from the Earth. In this case, it means it is strongest nearest the Earth. Therefore, you have a gradient that can be tapped to use the gravi- ty increase over distance (height) to pro- duce work. Aether/ZPE, being omnipresent, also has densities that are gradients. The Casimir plates do not push together when even an inch apart, but, placed within 14 angstroms, the pushing of the ambient ZPE forces them together with a pressure of 10 tons per square metre, as earlier quoted. Do not tons convert to pressure? Can we not take advantage of this pressure, as Maclay is attempting under the auspices of his US$300,000 NASA grant? There is a new science coming which will revolutionise the world in ways we cannot now imagine. mechanical, electrical, etc. This is what many so-called perpetual motion and free energy machines do, and many of us at KeelyNet are trying to replicate these for practical use worldwide. With regard to point 2, under the second law, the claim states that there is always a net increase in entropy, which drags the system down into chaos and causes it even- tually to stop; meaning that entropy is irre- versible and there can be no restorative, rejuvenating force. "The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us." "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" — David Sarnoff's associates, responding to his urgings for investment in radio in the 1920s The first law states that the total energy, including heat, in a (closed) system is con- served. By "closed", we mean a system that is completely cut off or insulated from its surroundings, so that no material or energy enters or leaves. The second law states that for a sponta- neous process, there is a net increase in entropy. The second law is possibly the most misunderstood scientific principle. The two most obvious misuses are: 1. Perpetual motion machines; 2. The statement, "Evolution is impossi- ble since entropy can't decrease". With regard to point 1, there is no closed system possible with materials and forces currently available (at least publicly) that "The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?" — David Sarnoff's associates, responding to his urgings for investment in radio in the 1920s The Creation of Energy Error This first issue deals with the commonly held consensus that we seek "something from nothing" and are attempting to create energy. The standard erroneous statement made by orthodox science goes back as far as Sir Isaac Newton, who once observed: "The seekers after perpetual motion are try- ing to get something from nothing." Under currently undefined conditions, it should be possible to adjust the perfor- mance characteristics of a system so that the operation involves the least possible 50 + NEXUS JUNE — JULY 2001 — Popular Mechanics, 1949 — Western Union memo, 1876 www.nexusmagazine.com