Page Content (OCR)
... GL@BAL NEWS ...
NEWS
Coleman and his lawyers can read why
they quashed his conviction. Reporting
restrictions also ensured the case received
little attention in the United States.
Coleman's research purports that an
American intelligence-controlled drug-run-
ning operation had facilitated the loading
of a bomb on Pan Am flight 103.
Coleman was ostracised by his bosses
and found himself facing charges of apply-
ing for a passport in a false name and com-
mitting perjury in an action heard some
years before. The passport application, he
said, had been made under orders from his
bosses at the Defense Intelligence Agency
(DIA). When he found he could not reach
his superiors, he decided to flee the coun-
try. He and his family were granted politi-
cal asylum in Sweden in 1990. In 1994
they moved to Spain.
The American authorities went to great
lengths and huge expense to discover his
whereabouts and to seek his extradition.
Eventually Coleman decided in 1996 to
return to the United States of his own voli-
tion to face charges. After months of
imprisonment, he was released last year
after a guilty plea and a fine of $30,000.
(Source: The Times, UK, 13 June 1999;
)
crisis into a market of scarce resources...
(Source: From an article by physicist
Vandana Shiva, published in The Hindu,
New Delhi, India, 1 May 1999; posted at
)
was an investigator and gunslinger for the
Criminal Investigation Division of the
IRS—now regards his former employer.
His conclusion is based in part on a per-
sonal two-year investigation into the agen-
cy's history and purpose—an investigation
he began somewhat reluctantly, never
expecting he'd reach the conclusion he did.
His research led him to question the very
legality and constitutionality of the IRS.
Deeply disturbed by his discoveries, he
summarised these in a report which, in
February, he sent to his supervisors, asking
them to respond to three allegations:
1. That the filing of federal income tax
returns is voluntary, and the filing of feder-
al income tax returns is not required;
2. That the 16th Amendment to the US
Constitution was never ratified;
3. That income taxes are not used to pay
for daily government operations, but to
pay the interest on the national debt.
"All the time I was doing my research, I
looked for snags—looked for things that
would prove that everything I was reading
and finding out was wrong," Banister told
WorldNetDaily.
"Thad taken this job thinking I'd be
wearing the white hat, and I slowly found
out I was not wearing the white hat. So
something had to change."
The change came quickly last month
[February] when the IRS accepted
Ly uu purpuow un
INDUSTRY-FUNDED ASPARTAME he began somewhat reluctantly, neve
STUDIES FLAWED expecting he'd reach the conclusion he did.
Sees questions have been raised about —_ His research led him to question the very
the reliability of industry-sponsored __ legality and constitutionality of the IRS.
studies of the safety of synthetic chemi- Deeply disturbed by his discoveries, he
cals. Aspartame in particular has been the summarised these in a report which, in
focus of significant ongoing controversy. February, he sent to his supervisors, asking
Studies of aspartame in the peer- them to respond to three allegations:
reviewed medical literature were surveyed 1. That the filing of federal income tax
for funding source and study outcome. Of returns is voluntary, and the filing of feder-
the 166 studies felt to have relevance for _al income tax returns is not required;
questions of human safety, 74 had 2. That the 16th Amendment to the US
Nutrasweet®-industry-related funding and —_ Constitution was never ratified;
92 were independently funded. 3. That income taxes are not used to pay
One hundred per cent of the industry- _ for daily government operations, but to
funded research attested to aspartame's _ pay the interest on the national debt.
safety, whereas 92 per cent of the indepen- "All the time I was doing my research, I
dently funded research identified problems looked for snags—looked for things that
with aspartame. would prove that everything I was reading
A bibliography supplied by the and finding out was wrong," Banister told
Nutrasweet® Company included many — WorldNetDaily.
studies of questionable validity and rele- "Thad taken this job thinking I'd be
vance, with multiple instances of the same —_ wearing the white hat, and I slowly found
study being cited up to six times. out I was not wearing the white hat. So
(Source: Dr Ralph G. Walton, The Center something had to change."
for Behavioral Medicine, Northside Medical The change came quickly last month
Center, 500 Gypsy Lane, Youngstown, Ohio [February] when the IRS accepted
44501, USA, e-mail
) 00 ) q7—~
FORMER IRS $1) 0} | =~
AGENT SAYS
INCOME TAX IS
ILLEGAL
lhe US Internal
Revenue
Service (IRS) is
everything the so-
called tax protesters
say it is: non-
responsive, unable
to withstand scruti-
ny, tyrannical, and
oblivious to the rule
of law and the
Constitution.
That's how
Joseph Banister—a
certified public
accountant who,
until last month,
MONSANTO PLANS TO
CONTROL WATER RESOURCES
Tensnational giant Monsanto has iden-
tified a new business opportunity
because of the emerging water crisis and
the funding available to make this vital
resource available to people.
As it states in its strategy paper: "First,
we believe that discontinuities (either
major policy changes or major trendline
breaks in resource quality or quantity) are
likely, particularly in the area of water, and
we will be well-positioned via these busi-
nesses [owned by Monsanto and men-
tioned earlier in the paper] to profit even
more significantly when these discontinu-
ities occur.
"Second, we are exploring the potential
of non-conventional financing (NGOs,
World Bank, USDA, etc.) that may lower
our investment or provide local country
business-building resources."
Thus, the crisis of pollution and deple-
tion of water resources is viewed by
Monsanto as a business opportunity. For
Monsanto, "sustainable development"
means the conversion of an ecological
NEXUS 7
AUGUST - SEPTEMBER 1999