Nexus - 0406 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

Numerous persons reported structural damage to their proper - regional damage to unshielded electrical systems. ty. Powerlines collapsed. Curiously, meteorological reports con - If the postulated cause is correct, then this incident is a perfect firmed that there was no cloud, wind, rain or lightning active that example of a defocused EM weapon strike—perhaps a British test night, resulting in a number of property damage claims not being or, more likely, a Russian test designed to ascertain if UK authori- met, in spite of investigation. Other witnesses spoke of a stilland __ ties would recognise the technology and react (it being quite prob- cloudless night. able that they would not know what had actually taken place). Eyewitnesses described a number of balls of white light streak - The subsequent high-level British military activity at the ing to the UFO as it descended near Annesley Hall, which stands Mansfield site demonstrates a very strong interest in this type of on private grounds, hampering attempts to obtain further infor - event. So someone at least was on the ball—in sharp contrast to mation. At 2.15 am seven military helicopters, including what our Australian authorities who appear to be adopting an ostrich- appeared to be troop-carrying Chinook surrounded by Gazelles type approach. and Lynxes, flew in at low speed, scanning the area with search Such zigzagging or angular sine-wave-type fireball/lights have lights over Normanton, Sutton-in-Ashfield and Kirkby. The police been quite commonly observed in the skies over the Kimberley subsequently cordoned off the impact site and erected road blocks region of northwestern Australia in recent years. These events that remained for several days. appear to be mega-scale examples of oscilloscope-type action, Trees at the site are still badly incinerated and many are with the moving EM energy light slug being controlled by electro- marked for removal. The army remained at the impact site for static wave grids in the atmosphere/ionosphere. three to four days. The first impact of the object, before it bounced, caused a raging conflagration which burned some trees | EUREKA EVENT, CALIFORNIA, USA, 1994 down and caused others to burn on the opposite side of their The following report, quite typical of the genre, was written by trunks from the fire. Damage left in the wood was calculated to Christine Gates of Blue Lake, California, USA, and recently e- have been made by an object approximately 60 feet across, con - mailed to this author: firmed visually by one witness. The trees were oddly bent from Whilst driving (alone) from San Jose, California, north to my the base to a height of six feet and further. In microwave-like home in Eureka, California, on September 24, 1994 at 9.32 pm, I fashion, pine cones were burnt from saw a blue fireball with a gold tail the inside out. race by me. The day after the incident, heavy These are my best guesses about military lorries arrived at the site. The subsequent high-level distance and speed. It was not too far Armed guards were posted to prevent from me, maybe a half mile or so. It access; government officials and spot - British military activity at the was traveling between me and the ter planes were seen. At the first mountains near Highway 101. It was impact site, topsoil was found to have Mansfield site demonstrates a approximately 100-200 feet off the been removed down to a level of about very strong interest in this ground, traveling from south to north nine inches. This was replaced with at about 200 mph. I slowed the car clay and covered with new topsoil; type of event. down a little to watch this beautiful pines and silver birch were planted. ‘thing’. It then continued north over This report is extremely interesting another mountain and then a huge from a number of angles, especially as flash of blue-white light lit up the it involves intense electrical activity night sky as though it were daytime! and night-time light-emission phenomena. The sightings of actual The flash came from where the fireball went over the horizon objects need to be treated with caution as, in common with most —_ and radiated from that point out to the entire sky. I was about 25 night-time observations, it is highly likely that only light emission — minutes south of my home in Eureka. Oh, my God! I thought it was actually observed, and thus the object or mass was assumed was a missile that had targeted the Eureka area. My husband and to be present behind the visible light—and this may or may not be —_— my two-year-old daughter were home waiting for me! Would they the true situation. be there when I arrived? Should I turn around? Are we at war? This Mansfield event may have been a secret military test of an‘ / nearly stopped on the highway because I was struck with terror! advanced propulsion system gone horribly wrong, or a similar There was a California Highway Patrol Officer and another car night-time flight of three such operational craft, or a true alien on the road with me. None of us actually stopped but we all UFO accident scenario; or perhaps it consisted of three separate slowed down and then sped towards the city. Tesla ray/wave plasma electromagnetic (EM) slugs (objects com- When I got home, Eureka was still there, just as I had left it the ing from three different directions and colliding) being transmit- day before. I was really confused. I ran into the house and asked ted to one target point where mutual interference released an EM my husband if he saw the flash of light. He looked at me funny pulse (similar in character to a nuclear EMP blast). and said, 'Yes, I saw it while I was sitting in the living room "A number of balls of white light streaking to the object as it watching TV. What was it?' descended" could be describing an EMP effect—similar to those The next day, I asked everyone I knew and every stranger that I seen in several early film records of nuclear blasts where a multi- passed if they had seen the flash of light and/or the fireball. If I tude of white lights streak upwards from ground level and curve remember correctly, about 80% of everyone asked saw the flash. around the nuke's central fireball plasma looking like hundreds of — Most of them were inside their houses at the time. People inland small rockets, but actually consisting of many small, induced-EM reported that they also heard a very loud rumbling noise just energy slugs, derived from the Earth's own 'ground' EM field by before the flash. No one on the coast said they heard the rum - the sudden creation of a massive new EM field density within the bling. I don't think that anyone that I asked saw the fireball. I nuclear blast's plasma fireball. It is this mechanism that actually even called people up and down the west coast to see how far creates the nuclear blast's EM pulse (EMP) and causes widespread north and south it was seen. I, personally, spoke to people as far regional damage to unshielded electrical systems. If the postulated cause is correct, then this incident is a perfect example of a defocused EM weapon strike—perhaps a British test or, more likely, a Russian test designed to ascertain if UK authori- ties would recognise the technology and react (it being quite prob- able that they would not know what had actually taken place). The subsequent high-level British military activity at the Mansfield site demonstrates a very strong interest in this type of event. So someone at least was on the ball—in sharp contrast to our Australian authorities who appear to be adopting an ostrich- type approach. Such zigzagging or angular sine-wave-type fireball/lights have been quite commonly observed in the skies over the Kimberley region of northwestern Australia in recent years. These events appear to be mega-scale examples of oscilloscope-type action, with the moving EM energy light slug being controlled by electro- static wave grids in the atmosphere/ionosphere. 66 = NEXUS very strong interest in this type of event. OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 1997