Nexus - 0222 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page 46 of 85

Page 46 of 85
Nexus - 0222 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

thought will show that as the gravity and light values vary, then all the physical processes, including our measuring instruments, will vary in direct ratio. All the readings will appear to remain con- stant. Time itself would also alter in relation to the gravity and light factors. It did not take me long to calculate a rough conversion table for get used to these concepts, but after a few practice calculations the process becomes evident. T have had many arguments with the academics over this, but the proof of this secret mathematical system is being made evident every day by the activities of their own associates. Constructions are appearing which comply with the harmonic values. Ancient constructions such as pyramids and cathedrals also comply with these harmonic values. These secrets have been handed down through the ages. So, if we multiply the value of 90.9345139 by the six harmonic seven times (i.¢., 90.9345139 x6 x6x6x6x6x6x6= 25455844), the result is a harmonic of 2545.5844 which is the dis- tance in minutes of arc of each Eltanin-type aerial from the grid poles and also the reciprocal harmonic of 3928.371, the difference in field density of Fields "A" and “B". It has been found that the value 143909.0655 minutes of arc per grid second for the speed of light factor has a direct geometric association with electromagnetic transmission and reception. It was years after I published this particular equation that I found this out by accident while checking other data. In my earlier publications I demonstrated how a third harmonic equation could be formulated by use of what I thought, at the time, to be a constant speed of light factor at the Earth's surface. I have now discovered that the speed of light is not a constant, and that different values, within a set range, can be entered into the equa- tion which will give particular harmonic results. The value I used was 143,795.77 minutes of arc per grid second. This, in fact, was very close to 143,791.36 minutes of arc per grid second, which can now be regarded as the reciprocal harmonic of gravity acceler- ation at the Earth's equator. The period or frequency rate between each pulse of physical matter creates the measurement that we call time, as well as the speed of light, at the particular — position in space of which we are the full 90 degrees from the equator to the poles. This was then extended harmonically to include the speed of light factors up to a maximum of 144,000 minutes of arc per grid second. The values we read on our instruments are those calculated at zero latitude, or the equator, because of relativity. When the light factors are converted back into normal measurements, kilometres per second, etc., we see that the values match those in the text- books. It was many years later when, because of a sudden hunch, I E = vV[Qc + V(1/2c))(2c?)] decided to check the gravity acoelerasion ‘asus ial a them into geometric equivalents in grid cin eet eahelin If the maximum value of "c", or 144,000 minutes of arc per grid second, is reduced by the harmonic of phi (1618.034) and entered into this equation, the result for "E" is the table for the variation of gravity with lati- tude at sea level, in one of my research books. (See Table 1.) 26944444 harmonic. The values were in metres/second’ and I decided to convert these progressively into . British feet, geodetic feet, minutes of arc or nautical miles, and 144,000.0000 degrees, based on grid time. I started off with the value at the - 161.8034 equator of 9.78039 metres per second squared, and when I found 143,838.1966 = the harmonic of "c" the value for degrees, or 60 nautical miles per grid second squared, I got a very pleasant surprise: 0.000069545205 degrees Therefore, per grid second squared. 287676.3932 = the harmonic of "2c" The previous speed of light harmonic reciprocal of 695 pub- Therefore, lished in my books was within about 5/100,000,000 of the true value of gravity acceleration in geometric terms. No wonder the E= V[(287676.3932 + V(1/287676.3932)) (287676.3932)']. secret groups were getting uneasy about my findings. It was becoming obvious now that gravity and the so-called speed of Using harmonics, light were harmonic reciprocals of each other, As gravity increased, the speed of light decreased, and vice versa. Light was = V{(2876763932 + 5895869843) (827577072)] therefore not a speed in the true sense. It is an acceleration or = V{(8772633775) (827577072)] deceleration according to geometric position. Because of relativi- = V7260030574 ty, it always appears to us as a constant factor. A little bit of E= 26944444 ww 133, 338 1966 Therefore, Therefore, Using harmonics, = V{(2876763932 + 5895869843) (827577072)] = V{(8772633775) (827577072)] = ¥7260030574 E = 26944444 NEXUS ¢ 45 It is only in recent times that I finally cracked this secret. Harmonic Unified Equation 3: E = V[(2c + V(12c))(2c?)] = the harmonic of "c" 287676.3932 = the harmonic of "2c" E = V[(287676.3932 + V(1/287676.3932)) (287676.3932)']. OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 1994