Page 74 of 77
The Mars Mission Cover-up ry technological civilisation which occupied Mars for an Dodd Street, Weehawken, NJ 07087, USA. Continued from page 37 undetermined period of time. ‘The Brandenburg, 8. Letter of 2 January 1992 from Dr Michael Malin, FOOTNOTES DiPietro and Molenaar hypothesis, which they title Mars Observer Mission Camera Principal Investigator, "The Cydonian Hypothesis", proposes that the anom- NASA, to Mark Archambault, reproduced in Martian alies were built by an indigenously evolved race of Horizons, vol. 1, no. 3, and (in part) in reference 3, humanoid Martians. See references 3 and 16. page 386. = — 5 11. The Mars Observer spacecraft, launched .. Physics, University of Tennessee Space Institute; Dr September 1992, copa Mars Observer camera, a Gunna ap ae “Otiee 7 “- oe Since David Webb, Professor of Space Education, Research threc-component telescopic imaging system designed a ri =a sre tiie at ‘sae saat and Technology at Embry-Riddle University, Daytona —_ for both high- and low-resolution photography of 10. Shaka cal Resviow of The Monuments Mars” Beach, Florida; Dr Thomas Van Flandem, former Mars. For a detailed t of th fit and the 1 ul Head, Celestial Mechanics Branch, US Naval camera, ee ares eat rity — anonymous memorandum included in a packet of Observatory; James Berkland, former Assistant 12. Reference 11, page 4. materials sent to Mr David Laverty by Mark A. Pine, Professor of Geology, Appalachian State University; 13. See Chapter Nine, Part D, under "Data Release”. NASA, apparently representing an official evaluation, 1. Among thom: Dr Robert M. Schoch, Associate Professor of Science and Mathematics (Geology), Boston University; Dr Horace Crater, Professor of and L. J. Angstrém, the great-grandson of the famous prepared for NASA, of some of the claims made in * physicist A. J. Angstrdm and Dircetor of the presti- REFERENCES Richard C. Hoagland's book, The Monuments of Mars gious Angstrém Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden. 1. DiPietro, Molenaar and Brandenburg, Unusual (reference 3). 2. Although the official decision that the craft was Mars Surface Features, Mars Research, PO Box 284, 11. “Information on NASA re-photographing the “Jost” came on Saturday evening, 21st August, Glenn Dale, MD 20769, USA, 1988 (4th ed.). Cydonia Region of Mars”, anonymous document dis- announcement of the loss was delayed until the morn- 2. Pozos, Randolfo R., The Face on Mars: Evidence tributed by NASA's Office for Legislative Affairs. ing of 22nd August. for a Lost Civilisation?, Chicago Review Press, 814N. — This document was being distributed as late as October 3. Reference 15, pages 489-90. Franklin, Chicago, IL 60610, USA, 1986. 1992. About 3 1/2 pages in length, it contains no iden- 4. Reference 15, page 523. 3. Hoagland, Richard C., The Monuments of Mars: A tifying marks as to its author or date of preparation. 5. Ibid., page 499. City on the Edge of Forever, North Atlantic Books, 12. "Mars Observer Fact Sheet”, distributed by NASA 6. Information as of 22nd September 1993. 2800 Woolsey Street, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA, 1992 = Propulsion Laboratory, California lutte of 7, 164 faethe: pepen: dewerguioa a8) (2nd ed.). Technology, Pasadena, CA 91108, dated May 1987 metres/pixel” where a pixel is the smallest bit of digital 4. Carlotto, Mark J., The Martian Enigmas: A Closer 3. 0 ey: Brian Expl hae . aud Outer is information in the image. Look, North Atlantic Books, 1991. pa te ms sao es —_ _— 8. See references 1-7. 5. Torun, Erol, "The Geomorphology and Geometry of 1PM ee NOUS “ 9. Reference 1, page 130; reference 2, page 30; refer- the D&M Pyramid”, unpublished paper, available 14. Malin, Michael, G. E. Danielson et al., "Mars ence 4, page 4. through Compuserve, ISSUES Forum, Section 10 Observer Camera”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 10. The two main extended hypotheses have been put —_under the file name pyrami.rsh. vol. 97, no. E5, 25 May 1992, pages 7699-7718. forward by Richard C. Hoagland on the one hand, and —6. Carlotto, Mark J., "Digital Imagery Analysis of 15. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, vol. 28, no. 5, the team of John E. Brandenburg, Vincent DiPietro and — Unusual Martian Surface Features”, Applied Optics, September-October 1991. Gregory Molenaar on the other. Hoagland’s view is vol. 27, no. 10, 1988. 16. Brandenburg, DiPietro and Molenaar, "The that the Martian anomalies, if they turn out to be artifi- 7. Martian Horizons: The Quarterly Journal of The Cydonian Hypothesis", Journal of Scientific cial, must be the work of an advanced non-indigenous Mars Mission, vol. 1, nos. 1, 2,3, Mars Mission, 122 Exploration, vol. 5, no. 1, pages 1-25 (1991). 0 NEXUS*73 APRIL - MAY 1994