/Nexus - 0218 - New Times Magazine/pages/0049/image.png)
Page Content (OCR)
REFERENCES 1. New Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 18, “Macropedia”, 1986, pp. 274-5. 2. “Investigational Devices Exemptions", H. H. S. Publication, FDA 89- 415, Food and Drug Administration, Rockwell, Maryland 20857, USA, August 1989. 3. Aharomov, Y. and Bohm, D., "Significance of Electromagnetic Potentials in Quantum Theory,” The Physical Review, vol. 115, no. 485, 1959. 4. Tonomura, A. Hitachi; L & C of Tokyo confirmed the Aharomov-Bohm effect in 1986 as stated in Robert Bradford article (see no. 8). 5. Nakaema, Kyoichi, “Magnetic Field Deficiency Syndrome and Magnetic Treatment", Japanese Medical Journal, no. 2745, 4 December 1976. 6. Davis, A. R. and W. Rawls, “The Magnetic Blueprint of Life", Acres USA, Kansas City, MO, USA, 1979. : Davis, A. R. and W. Rawls, "The Magnetic Effect", Acres USA, Kansas City, MO, USA, 1975. Davis, A. R. and W. Rawls, "Magnetism and Its Effect on the Living _. System", Acres USA, Kansas City, MO, USA, 1976. 7. Becker, R. O. and A. A. Marino, Electromagnetism and Life, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, USA, 1982. Becker, R. O. and G. Seldon, The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life, William Morrow & Co., New York, USA, 1986. Becker, R. O., Cross Currents, Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1990. 8. Bradford, Robert W., Rodriguez, Rodrigo, Garcia, Jorge and Henry Allen, "The Effect of Magnetic Poles on Accelerated Charge Neutralization of Malignant Tumours in Vivo," Robert W. Bradford Rescarch Institute, presented at the Intemational Symposium on Biomagnetology, Magnetothcrapy and Posturography, Salve Regina College, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, 29 May to 1 June 1989. 9. Trappier, Arthur et al., "Evolving Perspectives on the Exposure Risks trom Magnetic Fields", Journal of the National Medical Association, vol. 82, no. 9, September 1990. tion, and (b) metabolic oxidation apart from oxygen. 2) Direct application of a static negative magneto-electric energy field to the metabolic disorder area is more effective than such reflexology methods as massage, heat, cold, counterirritant methods (such as liniments or low-level positive magneto-electric fields) or acupuncture. 3) Direct application of a static negative magneto-electric field is more effective than homoeopathy. The gauss strength can be raised sufficiently to override all variables, and thus the individual homocopathic remedies are not needed. 4) The static magneto-electric energy can, without pulsing fre- quencies, achieve the necessary metabolic corrections. Specific pulsing frequencies are useful both without and with associated -magneto-electric fields. A comparison of magnetic fields without and with associated specific pulsing frequencies gives evidence that by raising the gauss strength and duration of application of the stat- ic magneto-electric energy field, the pulsing frequencies associated with magnetic field have little advantage over the negative magne- to-electric energy field without the pulsing frequencies. This steady-state magneto-electric energy field can be used to achieve the same results that can be achieved by associating pulsing fields with the magnetic field. It takes a little longer to achieve the same therapeutic results with a static magnetic field only. The advan- tages of using combined specific frequencies with negative magnet- ic energy are a quicker response and less cumbersome magnetic field application. There is a great future in combining pulsing fre- quencies with magnetic fields. By using external enhanced static magnetic fields with the body's pulsed electromagnetic energy field, there will be a multiplier effect of the energy received in the tissues. 48¢NEXUS To be continued in the next issue of NEXUS... (a FEBRUARY - MARCH 1994