Nexus - 0211 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

The invention may be broadly said to be, an electric motor and/or generator comprising a rotor consisting of a number of radially arrayed permanently magnetised poles, and a sta- tor consisting of a number of radially arrayed permanently magnetised poles, together with a number of wound poles. The rotor's permanently magnetised poles use ferrite mag- netic cores, and may comprise any even number of poles. The stator's wound poles employ steel or iron cores. The device is essentially a D.C. machine, but may be fed A.C. input with the use of a solid state converter. The Rotor uses a number of similar polarity permanent magnetic poles, i.e., all-South or all-North. A further set of wound poles are radially arrayed in the stator, and are arranged in such a manner as to be fed ener- gy, that is excited by back E.M.F. energy, from the poles of the rotor. Associated circuitry is provided to feed the energy back to the drive poles of the motor. The resulting characteristics of this design is that once the rotor is moved from the position of equilibrium, each pole is attracted to, or repulsed by the stator poles, but at a precise geometrical point with respect to them, the input current to the drive coils ceases. As a result, the collapsing field current is in the opposite direction to the applied force, thus reversing the magnetic polarity of the stator coils. This forces the rotor poles away (reaction), which is the instantaneous response of a system to an applied force, and is manifested as the exertion of a force equal in magnitude, but opposite in direction to the applied force. Pulsing the D.C. input current, overcomes losses generated in conventional motors. According to classical electrical engineering theory, efficiency is greater the more nearly equal the Back E.M_F. (electromotive force) is to the applied voltage, i.e. the lower the input current. Figure 6 shows that there is minimum 100% back E.MF. relative to the supply source of input D.C. voltage (according to classical electrical theory), which virtually depicts a sine wave due to the effect of the collapsing field. This effect also overcomes the electrodynamic torque problems associated with conventional motor designs. (As input power varies with the duty cycle pulse; i.e. the lower the input current, the lower the input current, and the lower the speed, the greater the torque.) At clip-off, the back-EMF ceases, the collapsing field takes over, opposing the outgo- ing rotor magnet and thus increasing momentum. With this design force is applied twice during each D.C. pulse, with pulse-on, and with pulse-off. The timing of the pulses are determined by the dimensions of the motor itself, i.e. the speed of rotation of the motor's central axle, the position of the rotor magnets in relation to the stator windings, as well as the distance that the rotor magnets travel when passing across the poles of the stator winding (See accompanying diagrams). CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATIONAL NOTES Important Factors 1) Care must be exercised when assembling and wiring the drive windings to make sure that their polarities match the rotor magnet polarity. 2) Common earthing must be avoided in order to preclude In 1978 Mr. Adams discovered that inventors of machines or devices of high energy efficiency capability (“Free” Energy) are not only refused patents, but that in most cases, their inventions are classified under the “Military Use Clause”, which is, of course, international. Inventors are prohibited from publishing details of their devices or pro- moting them in any manner if their invention is classified under this clause. In other words, their devices automatical- ly become the sole property of the “establishment”. The fact that there is an established mechanism to sup- press energy inventions of this nature has been a closely guarded secret for many years. Many inventors have made such claims, but the general public remain oblivious to the fact that they are being deprived of clean and free energy by organisations that would rather make money and hold power over the public, than allow such technology to become wide- ly available. Yet another example of the abuse of power. (No pun intended.) This motor generator would be called a “Free Energy” machine by most individuals. It is, in fact, a device that con- verts the perpetual motion of sub-atomic particles, known in physics terminology as “particle spin”, into conventional electric power. It is a widely accepted fact of physical law that sub-atomic particles are in a state of perpetual motion. Anybody who tells you that there is no such thing as perpet- ual motion is either ignorant or a liar. As Robert Adams states, “Our universe is a sea of energy - free, clean energy. It is all out there waiting for us to set sail upon it.” Adams has built a number of permanent magnet electric D.C. motor generators based on the principle outlined in this article, some of which have demonstrated an electrical effi- ciency of 690% and a mechanical efficiency of 620%. The devices run at room temperature. Any device that doesn't could not be running at over 100% efficiency, as heat is the major result of hysteresis losses that are induced in any con- ventional electric motor or generator. Radiated heat is a sure-fire sign that a power generator is not running over unity, as all heat radiated by such a device is wasted energy. I will remind readers once again at this point that Mr Adams is not a fly-by-night, propeller-head, whacko, tech- no-boffin. He is an electrical engineer with over 60 experi- ence in the field of electrical engineering, which has includ- ed designing and building equipment for use in power sta- tions, broadcasting facilities, airport communications cen- tres, etc. He is a former Chairman of the Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers, Inc., U.S.A., (N.Z. Section), and his resume includes personal referees ranging from a former New Zealand Commissioner of Police, a for- mer Chairman of Air New Zealand, (and several technical specialists from the airline), as well as an Ex- NASA scien- tist. Nexus would recommend to anybody interested in, or presently building a device of this nature, to try building a device based on Mr. Adams plans. His machines have demonstrated the ability to generate free energy, unlike most of the theoretical models that are promoted as over-unity devices. 32¢NEXUS GENERAL DESCRIPTION INVENTORS BEWARE ! “FREE” ENERGY DECEMBER-JANUARY ‘93