Nexus - 0203 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page 28 of 32

Page 28 of 32
Nexus - 0203 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

TOWARDS BIG BROTHER ° go on are instituted by a vindictive neighbor, an overzealous neighbor- hood watch participant, or maybe an angry relative or something of that nature. We know that some of the of fi- cers are dumping drugs on these peo- ple during raids, but we don’t know just how many innocents are af fected by this practice. To our amazement, we are able to obtain a search warrant from almost any Judge by giving nothing more than the person’s name and address. During our weekly card games, our group has discussed this this matter at length; and we feel that if left un- checked that the system will reduce us as officers to nothing more than feared S.S. officers. We know that we are systematically displacing large numbers of black males and poor white males through arrest and imprisonment; and we are getting increased pressure to get into the middle-class areas, to confiscate more property of higher value. We are not offering any political solutions to the situation and we are not suggesting that we stop the war on crime, but we feel that the public and the courts should be more concerned with individual civil rights if we are not to become a brutal police state. Unfortunately, already, we as offi- cers must protect our identity and our location from our own union, depart- ment heads, and fellow officers in fear of serious reprisals from within, for voicing our criticisms. Therefore, we are mailing this letter at our own expense to various people whom we feel may effectively inform the public in one way or another. Please copy and distribute! insights into how the military con- trolled the media during the campaign. "Correspondents were restricted from each access, fired upon, blind- folded, thumped with rifle butts, arrested, made to play out the propa- ganda games of the military high com- mand, interrogated and treated with total paranoia. "Many journalists had their creden- tials removed, or threatened to have their credentials removed. I think it is sometimes forgotten that in two coun- tries, Australia and America, that it was an elected Parliament and an elected Congress that sent forces to the gulf. The people who elected those governments damn well deserved to know what those forces were doing." "No journalist could go forward of a line without a military escort. This escort had to approve everything you saw, every question you asked and so on. Soldiers were ordered not to talk to the press full-stop." (Source: Courier Mail, Sat 6th April 1991) _MEDIA — The return to Australia of retired US Army colonel David Hackworth, one of the US army's most decorated sol- diers has revealed some. startling WHY I CHANGED MY OPINION ABOUT FLUORIDATION References : * Diesendorf M (1986b) A re-examination of Aust. fluoridation trials. Search 17, pp.256-261. + Diesendorf M (1987) Letter. The Ecologist 17(4/5), 207. * Diesendorf M, Sutton PRN (1986) Fluorides: New Grounds for Concern. The Ecologist 16, p237-42 * Gray AS (1987) Fluoridation: Time for a new baseline? Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 53(10), pp.763-765. ¢ Grimberden GW (1974) A double blind test for determination of intolerance to fluoridated water (preliminary report). Fluoride 7, 146-152. * Hamilton V, Birkbeck JA (1985) The Home Style survey of New Zealand’s changing diet. Quality Bakers, Palmerston North. ¢ Srikantia SG (1984) Endemic fluorosis in Andhra Pradesh. Bulletin of Nutrition Foundation of India 5, 2-4. ¢ Schatz A (1976) Increased death rates in Chile associated with artificial fluoridation of drinking water, with implications for other countries. Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities 2,1-17. * Susheela AK (1984) Epidemiology and control of fluorosis in India. Bulletin of Nutrition Foundation of India 5, 2-4. * Sutton PRN (1960) Fluoridation: errors and omissions in exper - imental trials. (2nd ed.) Melbourne University Press, Melbourne. * Sutton PRN (1987) Does fluoride ingestion affect developing immune system cells? Medical Hypotheses 23, 335-336. * Thylstrup A. Fejerskov C, Bruun C, Kann J (1979) Enamel changes and dental caries in 7 year old children given fluoride tablets from shortly after birth. Caries Research 13, 265-276. ¢ Waldbott GL, Burgstahler AW, McKinney HL (1978) Fluoridation: the Great Dilemma. Coranado Press, Lawrence Kansas. * Bille J, Hesselgren K, Thylstrup A (1986) Dental caries in Danish 7, 11 and 13-year-old children in 1963, 1972 and 1981. Caries Research 20, pp.534 - 542. * Colquhoun J (1984a) New evidence on fluoridation. Social Science & Medicine 19, 1239-1246. * Colquhoun J (1984b) Disfiguring dental fluorosis in Auckland, New Zealand. Fluoride 17, 66-72. * Colquhoun J (1985) Influence of social class and fluoridation on child dental health. Community Dentistry & Oral Epidemiology 13, 37-41. ¢ Colquhoun J (1986) Letter. Nature 324, 298. * Colquhoun J (1987) Child dental health differences in New Zealand. Community Health Studies 11(2), 85-90. * Colquhoun J (1988) Decline in primary tooth decay in New Zealand. Community Health Studies 12(2), (in press). * Colquhoun J, Mann R (1986, 1987) The Hastings Fluoridation Experiment: Science or Swindle? The Ecologist 16(6), 432-438. Postscript. The Ecologist 17(2), 125-126. Updated and presented as “A re-examination of New Zealand’s fluoridation trial” to the 56th Congress of the Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science at Massey University, Palmerstone North, New Zealand, Jan 1987. * Cutress TW, Suckling GW, Pearce EIF, Ball ME (1985) Defects of tooth enamel in children in fluoridated and non-fluoridated water areas of the Auckland Region. NZ Dental Journal 81, pp.12-19. * Diesendorf M (1986a) The mystery of declining tooth decay. Nature 322, pp.125-129. NEXUS - 29 GULF WAR CENSORSHIP MAY/JUNE 1991 *- YEAR BOOK