Nexus - 0108 - New Times Magazine-pages

Page Content (OCR)

andno subjective consciousness or words for If stress is the cause of hallucinations, Mesopotamia in the basin of the Tigris and it. then the death of the king would be more than Euphrates Rivers, the Sumerian, Babylo- To others aperson would appear to be the enough to trigger his hallucinated voice. The nian, Aramean, Akkadian and Hittite em- cause of their behaviour, butnotto the person house of the dead man, whose voice still pires distinguished between their living king themselves. Agamemnon says to Achilles tuled, would be regarded as special. He had and their god, although the king became “What could I do? The gods always have become a god-king and his house a temple, divine after death. This was not the case in their way” and Achilles accepts this explana- often with his remains inside - the source of Egypt. During the long period of the Egyp- tion without question. What we describe as the hallucinated commands that maintained tian dynasties, each king was Horus in life hallucinations directed the Trojan War, the cohesion of the group. The king’s succes- and became Osiris after death, the voice of which was fought by “noble automatons” sor may have been buried in the same god his father guiding him through the genera- who knew not what they did. They were house, as at Eynan (about 9,000 BCE in tions. Intermediaries between the king and humans without an intemal mind-space to Mesopotamia), suggesting that the halluci- those carrying out his orders heard the voice introspect upon. Planning and organisation nated voice of the old king became fused of the living king, not of his father. occurred withoul any consciousness and was with the voice of the new. Was this the As the bicameral world became more then ‘told’ to the individual in their familiar beginning of the Osiris myth that was so complex, the number of voices used by the language. The earliest writing in a language powerful in Egypt. Egyptian Pharaoh tohis courtiers increased - we can comprehend reveals a very different Ancientcivilizations of the Middle East, one text from 1,500BCE specifying 14. mentality from our own. The mentality de- Central and South America built cities Over the long millenia down to the 2nd pieted in this fragment of the Mycenean Age centred on huge monuments to the dead who millenium BCE, humanity acquired civiliza- is called by Jaynes the bicameral mind, lack- were called ‘gods’. In these temples, idols tion. With astonishing consistency, from ing the subjective analog he calls conscious- became increasingly common - during the Egypt to Peru, Greece to Mexico, these early ness. 7th and 6th millenia BCE, progressing from civilizations developed burial rites, idolatry extremely primitive figurines to large stat- and divine government. Their sculptures i ues, often with exaggerated eyes. Bicameral share the image of the god touching the king Th e B Icamera | Worl d humans believed that these idols spoke to on his left side. Bicameral kingdoms were The /liad is a window into unsubjec- them - as the Incas explained to the Spanish organised around a large central worship- live times, written during the great change in what was pos- from the bicameral to the conscious mind. It sibly one of the = x portrays a world of kingdoms centred on few confronta- royal palaces, strictly hierarchical in struc- tions between ture and supported by agriculture. It was the subjective and age of the great empires of the Nile and bicameral Tigris-Euphrates rivers. minds. Jaynes argues that arapid transformation By the third from gathering to agriculture, about millenium BCE, 9,000BCE, its spread around the castern writing had de- Mediterrancan and the growth of empires veloped from after 5,000 BCE were due to the operation of pictures of visual the bicameral mind. The bicameral mind was events to sym- a form of social control that allowed human- bols of phonetic ity to develop large communitics - it events, with “evolved as a final stage of the evolution of heiroglyphics language. And in this development lies the and the more origin of civilization” (p 126). widespread cu- From fossil evidence we know that the neiform falling brain size of early man grew with astonishing between these twoextremes. Although most ping-place where the king received guidance rapidity after25,000 BCE. Articulate speech of the words can be translated, being inven- from the god, in the form of a statue, that he had started and was becoming unilateral in tories or lists, abstract terms allow different passed on and repeated in his voice, halluci- the brain as, under the pressure of enduring interpretations, depending on context and nated in the minds of the people. tasks, verbal hallucinations evolved through translator. But we know enough about early Bicameral humans had two separately natural selection as a method of behavioural Mesopotamian kingdoms tobe surc that they integrated organisations in the nervous sys- control. They were necessary for the conti- were Theocracies, ruled by priests under the tem - one in left hemisphere that was articu- nuity of the tribal group. king who was the first deputy of each city’s late, the one on the right composing what to The significance of the beginning of god. say. Neither side was ‘conscious’ in our language is that it allowed the chief, or king, Large structures, like ziggurats, housing sense. Bicameral civilization was founded to exercise control and to keep his people at the statue of the god, are common to most on obedience to the gods of one’s city and their task. As small tribal villages grew into bicameral kingdoms. The inscriptions on was therefore politically stable (despite the agricultural towns, auditory hallucinations these monuments tell of the god as com- regularity of wars between cities and empires developed from a form of behavioural con- mander, counsellor, decision-maker and of there were few internal power struggles). trol into the basis of social control. This was the elaborate rituals for feeding, clothing and The bicameral mind accepted the authority aresult of the association of the voice with washing the statue. The king was the man- of the gods and, with no subjective sense of the person of the king. ager and carctaker of the god’s lands. In purpose, the hierarchy that served them. it. then the death of the king would be more than Euphrates Rivers, the Sumerian, Babylo- To others aperson would appear to be the enough to trigger his hallucinated voice. The nian, Aramean, Akkadian and Hittite em- cause of their behaviour, butnotto the person house of the dead man, whose voice still pires distinguished between their living king themselves. Agamemnon says to Achilles tuled, would be regarded as special. He had and their god, although the king became “What could I do? The gods always have become a god-king and his house a temple, divine after death. This was not the case in their way” and Achilles accepts this explana- often with his remains inside - the source of Egypt. During the long period of the Egyp- tion without question. What we describe as the hallucinated commands that maintained tian dynasties, each king was Horus in life hallucinations directed the Trojan War, the cohesion of the group. The king’s succes- and became Osiris after death, the voice of which was fought by “noble automatons” sor may have been buried in the same god his father guiding him through the genera- who knew not what they did. They were house, as at Eynan (about 9,000 BCE in tions. Intermediaries between the king and humans without an intemal mind-space to Mesopotamia), suggesting that the halluci- those carrying out his orders heard the voice introspect upon. Planning and organisation nated voice of the old king became fused of the living king, not of his father. occurred withoul any consciousness and was with the voice of the new. Was this the As the bicameral world became more then ‘told’ to the individual in their familiar beginning of the Osiris myth that was so complex, the number of voices used by the language. The earliest writing in a language powerful in Egypt. Egyptian Pharaoh tohis courtiers increased - we can comprehend reveals a very different Ancientcivilizations of the Middle East, one text from 1,500BCE specifying 14. mentality from our own. The mentality de- Central and South America built cities Over the long millenia down to the 2nd pieted in this fragment of the Mycenean Age centred on huge monuments to the dead who millenium BCE, humanity acquired civiliza- is called by Jaynes the bicameral mind, lack- were called ‘gods’. In these temples, idols tion. With astonishing consistency, from ing the subjective analog he calls conscious- became increasingly common - during the Egypt to Peru, Greece to Mexico, these early ness. 7th and 6th millenia BCE, progressing from civilizations developed burial rites, idolatry extremely primitive figurines to large stat- and divine government. Their sculptures i ues, often with exaggerated eyes. Bicameral share the image of the god touching the king Th e B icamera Worl d humans believed that these idols spoke to on his left side. Bicameral kingdoms were The /liad is a window into unsubjec- them - as the Incas explained to the Spanish organised around a large central worship- live times, written during the great change in what was pos- from the bicameral to the conscious mind. It sibly one of the = , ~ portrays a world of kingdoms centred on few confronta- royal palaces, strictly hierarchical in struc- tions between ture and supported by agriculture. It was the subjective and age of the great empires of the Nile and bicameral Tigris-Euphrates rivers. minds. Jaynes argues that arapid transformation By the third from gathering to agriculture, about millenium BCE, 9,000BCE, its spread around the castern writing had de- Mediterrancan and the growth of empires veloped from after 5,000 BCE were due to the operation of pictures of visual the bicameral mind. The bicameral mind was events to sym- a form of social control that allowed human- bols of phonetic ity to develop large communitics - it events, with “evolved as a final stage of the evolution of heiroglyphics language. And in this development lies the and the more origin of civilization” (p 126). widespread cu- From fossil evidence we know that the neiform falling brain size of early man grew with astonishing between these twoextremes. Although most ping-place where the king received guidance rapidity after25,000 BCE. Articulate speech of the words can be translated, being inven- from the god, in the form of a statue, that he had started and was becoming unilateral in tories or lists, abstract terms allow different passed on and repeated in his voice, halluci- the brain as, under the pressure of enduring interpretations, depending on context and nated in the minds of the people. tasks, verbal hallucinations evolved through translator. But we know enough about early Bicameral humans had two separately natural selection as a method of behavioural Mesopotamian kingdoms tobe surc that they integrated organisations in the nervous sys- control. They were necessary for the conti- were Theocracies, ruled by priests under the tem - one in left hemisphere that was articu- nuity of the tribal group. king who was the first deputy of each city’s late, the one on the right composing what to The significance of the beginning of god. say. Neither side was ‘conscious’ in our language is that it allowed the chief, or king, Large structures, like ziggurats, housing sense. Bicameral civilization was founded to exercise control and to keep his people at the statue of the god, are common to most on obedience to the gods of one’s city and their task. As small tribal villages grew into bicameral kingdoms. The inscriptions on was therefore politically stable (despite the agricultural towns, auditory hallucinations these monuments tell of the god as com- regularity of wars between cities and empires developed from a form of behavioural con- mander, counsellor, decision-maker and of there were few internal power struggles). trol into the basis of social control. This was the elaborate rituals for feeding, clothing and The bicameral mind accepted the authority aresult of the association of the voice with washing the statue. The king was the man- of the gods and, with no subjective sense of the person of the king. ager and carctaker of the god’s lands. In purpose, the hicrarchy that served them. 36 NEXUS New es Eight - Autumn 1989 NEXUS New Times Eight - Autumn 1989 The Bicameral World