/Nexus - 0108 - New Times Magazine/pages/0036/image.png)
Page Content (OCR)
cluded such development. Julian Jaynes through a situation and to believes that the right hemisphere was anticipate likely outcomes, } \ WANT you left free to listen to the language of the bicameral humanity de- gods. These gods were, according to pended on voices to guide Jaynes, hallucinatory mental voices - them. Jaynes likens it to sometimes ‘heard’ by more than one driving a car - while en- individual at the same time, gaged in hand, foot and The ‘voices’ and ‘speech of the head behaviour, one’s con- gods’ were organised in the right area sciousness is usually en- that corresponds to Wernicke’s area on gaged in something clse. the left, and could have been transmitted There is a “reciprocity of tothe articulate right across the connect- stimulation” in one’s rela- ing neural pathway. Stimulating the tion to the world, a smooth right side induces auditory and some- interchange of action and times visual hallucinations in people - reaction that is only inter- they hear voices that often command or rupted when a new situ- admonish them. Often the experiences ation occurs. are remembered as an actual event, When we're confronted where the person hearing the voices was with something new weas- passively acted upon. The significant sess its implications using point is the ‘otherness’ of such experi- our lifetime’s expericnce. ences, not the actions or words that are When bicameral humans heard. had to make a decision they — J Modern clinical testing provides relied on the bicameral ' Py iL ioe : WY ' | some support for this hypothesis. It has voice which came and a bo t| qa ABS a a been shown that both sides of the brain “with the stored up ad- Fx 4 can understand language and that, under | monitory wisdom ofhis life / ZN OH GOD...HEKE if certain conditions, the two sides can act | would tell him noncon- }444% Lies gs ZN WE Go AGAIN @ 5 independently, Differences incognitive | sciously whattodo.” (p85) Lia eV OOPS function today echo the differences of In one’s normal day-to-day activities, a To each individual the voices function between humans and gods in where what is to be done has been must have seemed omnipotent and the past. For early civilised man the gods learned - like driving a car or ploughing omniscient, commanding obedience. were responsible for guiding and plan- aficld - such instruction is notnecessary. Because most of our lives are routine ning action, they sorted out and catego- The language of the earliest surviv- and because obedience is the basis of rised events and directed humanity in its ing writings depicts this state of mind; social organisation, Jaynes believes that efforts. From what we know of early “god’ spoke to Moses, Athena made the civilization without consciousness is civilisations mankind lived, behaved decision for Achilles on the beach be- possible. More than that, he believes that and thought very differently from our fore Troy. In both cases the voice ap- there is good evidence for the existence modern experience. peared asa grey mist. While we describe of the bicameral mind left to us from the z . these as hallucinations, to bicameral earliest civilizations. The first records, Th e Bi camera | M I nd humans the voice had tobe obeyed with- | dating from around 3000BCE, are im- . : out questioning or doubt. To hear was to possible to translate exactly because Bicameral humanity hadamindthat | obey (asmany ‘psychotics’ do,auditory | they arc hieroglyphics and cuneiform. was not just physically divided intotwo, | hallucinations also being common in The oldest writing that we can translate buthad one halfthatcommunicatedwith | schitzophrenics) because the command | with reasonable certainty is the epic people while the other half relayed the | and the action were not separated inthe | history of the Greeks and the Trojans. information of the individual’s bicam- | picameral mind. One side ‘spoke’ to the Occurring sometime in the thirteenth eral voice, or god. “At one time human | other and events then took their course. | century BCE and written down around nature was splitin two, an exccutive part What caused the bicameral voices? 850-900BCE this story, known as the called a god, anda followerpartcalleda | Jaynes suggests itwas stress. Bicameral | Iliad, is attributed to Homer although man. Neither part was conscious. This is people had a much lower stress thresh- written by a succession of bards (poets). almost incomprehensible to us.” (p 84) | old than modern humans and anything | Jaynes regards this as a psychological When Jaynes describes bicameral that required a decision of any sort was | document of immense importance and mind as nonconconscious, he is talking | sufficienttocauseanauditoryhallucina- | asks “What is mind in the Iliad?...The about the language-based, metaphor- | tion. Outof decision/stress wouldcome | answeris disturbingly interesting. There gencrated analog that he calls con- a divine voice that made the choice or is in general no consciousness in the sciousness. Lacking the ability to think resolved any conflict between habit and Tliad” (p.69) - no mind, no soul or will, Continues Over WIN t yy left free to listen to the language of the | bicameral humanity de- gods. These gods were, according to pended on voices to guide Jaynes, hallucinatory mental voices - them. Jaynes likens it to sometimes ‘heard’ by more than one driving a car - while en- individual at the same time, gaged in hand, foot and The ‘voices’ and ‘speech of the head behaviour, one’s con- gods’ were organised in the right area sciousness is usually en- that corresponds to Wernicke’s area on gaged in something clse. the left, and could have been transmitted There is a “reciprocity of tothe articulate right across the connect- stimulation” in one’s rela- ing neural pathway. Stimulating the tion to the world, a smooth right side induces auditory and some- interchange of action and times visual hallucinations in people - reaction that is only inter- they hear voices that often command or rupted when a new situ- admonish them. Often the experiences ation occurs. are remembered as an actual event, When we're confronted where the person hearing the voices was with something new weas- passively acted upon. The significant sess its implications using point is the ‘otherness’ of such experi- our lifetime’s expericnce. ences, not the actions or words that are When bicameral humans [yp heard. hadtomakeadecisionthey mosey) WY) 4 ae Modern clinical testing provides relied on the bicamcral #™ (8 M - some support for this hypothesis. It has voice which came and fj im, f Wiss UT] ws been shown that both sides of the brain “with the stored up ad- a can understand language and that, under monitory wisdom ofhis life L LOK AN OF GOD. iy certain conditions, the two sides can act would tell him noncon- LEELA WE Go AGA TINY: DLA ULL L eed COI OO IOI AN independently. Differences in cognitive sciously what to do.” (p85) function today echo the differences of In one’s normal day-to-day activities, novelty. To each individual the voices function between humans and gods in where what is to be done has been must have seemed omnipotent and the past. For early civilised man the gods learned - like driving a car or ploughing omniscient, commanding obedience. were responsible for guiding and plan- aficld - such instruction is notnecessary. Because most of our lives are routine ning action, they sorted out and catego- The language of the earliest surviv- and because obedience is the basis of rised events and directed humanity in its ing writings depicts this state of mind; social organisation, Jaynes believes that efforts. From what we know of early “god’ spoke to Moses, Athena made the civilization without consciousness is civilisations mankind lived, behaved decision for Achilles on the beach be- possible. More than that, he believes that and thought very differently from our fore Troy. In both cases the voice ap- there is good evidence for the existence modern experience. peared asa grey mist. While we describe of the bicameral mind left to us from the . . these as hallucinations, to bicameral earliest civilizations. The first records, Th e Bi cam eral M I nd humans the voice had tobe obeyed with- | dating from around 3000BCE, are im- . : out questioning or doubt. To hear was to possible to translate exactly because Bicameral humanity hadamindthat | obey (asmany ‘psychotics’ do,auditory | they arc hieroglyphics and cuneiform. was not just physically divided intotwo, | hallucinations also being common in | The oldest writing that we can translate buthad one halfthatcommunicatedwith | schitzophrenics) because the command | with reasonable certainty is the epic people while the other half relayed the | and the action were not separated inthe | history of the Greeks and the Trojans. information of the individual’s bicam- | picameral mind. One side ‘spoke’ to the Occurring sometime in the thirteenth eral voice, or god. “At one time human | other and events then took their course. | century BCE and written down around nature was splitin two, an exccutive part What caused the bicameral voices? 850-900BCE this story, known as the called a god, anda followerpartcalleda | Jaynes suggests itwas stress. Bicameral | Iliad, is attributed to Homer although man. Neither part was conscious. This is people had a much lower stress thresh- written by a succession of bards (poets). almost incomprehensible to us.” (p 84) | old than modern humans and anything | Jaynes regards this as a psychological When Jaynes describes bicameral that required a decision of any sort was | document of immense importance and mind as nonconconscious, he is talking | sufficienttocauseanauditoryhallucina- | asks “What is mind in the Iliad?...The about the language-based, metaphor- | tion. Outof decision/stress wouldcome | answeris disturbingly interesting. There generated analog that he calls con- | a divine voice that made the choice or | is in general no consciousness in the sciousness. Lacking the ability to think | resolyed any conflict between habitand | Iliad” (p.69) - no mind, no soul or will, Continues Over y Cianes Bight + Anton 1)3p The Bicameral Mind