Page Content (OCR)
intelligence services of some powerful country ? Or really extraterrestrians in flesh and bones ? Interesting question. Let's discuss the first hypothesis. The one of a crazy scientist, unique author of all these text, is not credible, because the reports touch too different domains. Overall, the whole information is self-consistent. The different reports are connected one to the other. It seems to have a very strong underground logic. This means that an interdisciplinary group should have been constituted with several crazy scientists, very tenacious, to have kept on this experiment during so much time 16. With which goal ? To be amused by some Spaniards, unable to understand a line of these texts ? This makes no sense. On the other side, as these texts are scientifically very productive, I can't imagine some scientist making such gifts. The given indications, for instance in cosmology, were quite precise. They involved me in building an original model concerning the twin structure and the evolution of the Universe, which is something. These scientific works are not inconsistent deliriums, whether I could not have published them in high level revues, which have the reputation to be very cautious. Their implications are important. We will come back on them later. We explain, beyond other things, the large structure of the Universe and the origin of the spiral shape of galaxies. Our last work ( see the appendix ) identifies the matter of the twin Universe to the cosmological anti-matter. This building fits perfectly the informations presented in the Sesma book, in 1967. This anti-matter is enantiomorphic and A student in science could not have produce the keys concerning a new cosmological solution. In case of a "funny scientist", he would have to build this solution, achieve the work, in a relatively precise way. Let me give you an analogy. The equation of general relativity are so complex, from a mathematical point of view, that it is impossible to give indications by just writing anything, by hazard. This is equivalent of give the first five numbers of a safe combinaison which would have seven numbers. If by manipulating the lock of the safe after many tries and efforts the door would open, this means that the one who gave the fisrt five numbers knew the complete combinaison. If the author would have given them by hazard, the safe could not have been opened. If one or several scientists are at the origin of the soe saad 1 key-information, they would have already build the whole basic theory, very complex. In this case, why haven't they published immediately this work? In the scientific world, people do not make such gift, of such an importance. 80 owns an opposite time arrow.