Page Content (OCR)
CHAPTER IN KANT’s CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON, he pre- sented his antinomies, one of which is related to the structure of truth. Freedom constitutes the thesis; determinism (natural causality) is the antithesis. The paradox of absolute truth is caused by the fact that “each act is always both the effect of a cause according to a certain degree of determinism and the cause of an effect according to causal- ity through freedom. Paradoxically, every act is therefore both free and determined.” If causality through freedom does not exist, our choices do not make any concrete ripples in the universal pond. The results do not correspond to our expectations due to this lack of causality. Choosing is unnecessary, because it does not produce an adequate result. Daily life clearly shows proof to the contrary. Strict determinism, caused by “lawful” causality, strips free will of its validity because every choice is as such the impersonal result of a series of causes that led to this appar- ent choice. In other words, our choice was predetermined. An Oriental proverb says that freedom does not exist, only the act of freeing our- selves! However, of what should we free ourselves? I believe in vari- able causality. If determinism was indeed a universal law, quantum mechanics and its probabilistic nature simply would not exist. It is this research method that endeavors to grasp the nature of the world. Freedom means leaving the deterministic path by gradually break- ing free from what we believe determines our choices: ego! Ego is part of a range of possible behaviors that we apologetically qualify as psy- chological, preventing us from developing the knowledge offered by 85 Free at last? Let me state the dilemma as clearly as possible. Which extreme solutions are within our reach?