Page Content (OCR)
paralyzed witnesses can still move their eyes’* (otherwise they would not be witnesses) and remain conscious of what they see. Most of the time, however, abductees become aware of their abduction only after noticing the missing time on their watch. They do not remember what happened or if anything happened due to a con- sistent loss of information after returning from the experience, as if waking from a dream (cf. immaterial entropy). This is a return from a higher temporal density than in the aforementioned case (conscious witness). It can be explained by the fact that higher time densities contain larger amounts of information. Based on the generalized second law of entropy stating that the immaterial possesses more information than the material, every experience, incorrectly called imaginary, is in fact the essence of an entropy — in terms of information — greater than the events of the physical world. After returning to the physical time flow, this information disappears because it cannot be retained (there are fewer time quanta). I should add that vessels travel in time. By going back into the past, even a little — prior to an abduction, for example, or prior to a crucial moment of the experience — it may seem as if the situation never took place. The abductee whose unconscious mind can- not comprehend the disappearance of a causal relation in physical time feels as if nothing ever happened. When psychologists speak of creating false memories, which some- times occurs in the waking state when it is not in line with a higher entropy, they utterly disregard the bases of fundamental physics. Of course, that is not their field of expertise. The excessive use of statistics does not even begin to explain the real mechanisms. Most individuals do not have the perceptual maturity required to screen the information they receive to distinguish between the emission of waves (creation) and their reception (real perception) during telepathic experiences. The discipline of human sciences reduces the importance of the “reception” element in the creative part. The problem of debates is that ignorance has declared itself the truth. It is almost impossible to ascertain the nature of the experience with the help of a mechanism used to return to the temporal densities where the experience took place. A conscious effort allows those who regu- larly meditate or who make an effort to remember their dreams (both using the same mechanism) to recall all or part of this experience. Sleep, meditation, remote viewing and hypnosis all trigger a similar process. We detach ourselves from the physical time flow by reducing