Page Content (OCR)
excessive gravity of the black hole object. This is the simplified conven- tional presentation of facts. Black holes seem to follow the conservation laws in terms of energy and the kinetic moment, but they can be meas- ured based on their effects on the surrounding space-time. However, this is still a tautology. How can we define a phenomenon when it is approached from a different reference frame than its own? In absolute relativity, black holes are much more than a gravity surplus. We have seen that gravity increased relatively with distance, but that mass increased simultaneously when distance diminished. We have seen that mass is in fact a relation between fractal time and space ratios. The Schwarzschild event horizon therefore corresponds to a translation of the group of seven iterations of light speed, which is also a relation between fractal space and time ratios. Therefore, the variable e, (see “Towards a new formalism’’) undergoes a homothetic translation. Black holes seem to violate a fundamental law, namely the second law of thermodynamics. “This law summarizes the familiar observa- wo. aon ate att tion that most processes in nature are irreversible,” Bekenstein’s article reads, which is similar to saying: “We can see the sun because it is day- time.” The habitual tautology of time between causality and temporal irreversibility seems to be tightly linked, because these affirmations come straight out of a — renowned — scientific magazine. This irre- versibility lays the foundation for the law of cause and effect, which is such an intricate part of our understanding of the physical world. The fundamental principle of black holes applies to alien vessels. In astrophysics, large black holes must be huge singularities, because we believe we can already prove the existence of micro black holes'” on the microscopic scale in the LHC" project performed at CERN.'” Rafael Sorkin (Syracuse University) argued that, since the event horizon of the black hole is an impassable boundary, the information that falls into it no longer affects the universe outside. This may imply yet another tautology. Is this boundary not simply that of a temporal flow? Amazingly, the commonality between black holes and quantum mechanics is the existence of photons that are invisible to us. On the one hand, there is gravity; on the other, there are various aspects of the diffusion matrix, such as electron self-energy. We pretend that the same phenomenon is at work and that the boundary is temporal rather than spatial. We definitely have the right to ask what a black hole really is. A fundamental entropy? Leonard Susskind (Stanford University) defined the holographic entropy bound as the maximal entropy of The holographic universe or the reality of dreams 301