Page Content (OCR)
This also suggests that the two galaxies are relatively close together compared to the distance between them and us. The superposition of temporal flows of the space intervals does not equal the flow of every single distance. These temporal flows are probably additive in nature. The danger of interpreting cosmic events based on our weak macroscopic scale is that the spatio-temporal fractals are disregarded toad by telescopes. We have all heard of the so-called missing mass of the universe. Our magazines overflow with this unpredictable type of mass. We do not lack some, but almost all of it. Why is this mass so low? Two essential forces are known to exist in the universe. The forces of expansion that tend to move mass further away from us — the centrifugal force of galaxies being one of these forces — and gravity, which tends to pull in mass. We are inclined to believe that these forces are neutralized when a system is stable, like our Milky Way. On the one hand, we have defined and categorized the composition of every single mass in the galaxy by spectral analysis (every atom possess its own spectrum). On the other, we know the expansion forces of rotating celestial bodies depending on their mass. Unfortunately, the calculations have shown that the mass of these bodies was quite insufficient to justify this equi- librium between centrifugal force and gravity. Logically speaking the law of universal gravitation, shared by every observatory on Earth, should not prevent galaxies from flying into pieces. So what holds galaxies and other clusters or superclusters together? In line with my equations, I should a priori add mass to this collec- tion: it is the missing mass (or dark mass) that we still have not seen despite the progress made in measuring instruments (Hubble space telescope). Astrophysicists therefore picture two scenarios. It is either ‘dark mass’, i.e., matter that does not radiate light, or ““shadow mass,” i.e the matter of an invisible mirror universe. The problem with the first scenario is to justify that an imperceptibly low density of matter is still capable of compensating for the seventy to ninety percent of missing mass! When this proved impossible, a repelling dark energy was invented, the existence of which had never been proven under laboratory circumstances! Laboratories may be nei- ther a panacea, nor a reference (even less in absolute relativity), but the idea that two parts of the universe can push away from each other clashes with our rational intellect. This is a huge dilemma, because numerous enigmas persist despite this explanation. Recent studies have The soft sciences: weightier than billions of suns 289