Page Content (OCR)
first particle that concretizes the velocity and position of the two quan- tons simultaneously. Einstein was puzzled by the fact that measuring the first particle determined the velocity and position of the second. The three scientists therefore believed there were hidden variables exposing 1 toons a quantum physics’ incompleteness. The quantum physicist argued that the measurement creates the behavior of both particles at the same time. However, how is that pos- sible? The problem of the choice of variables of velocity and position as observable parameters does not allow us to choose between the classi- cal physicist, who said that the disintegration caused by the matching system forced the particles to move in the opposite direction, and the quantum physicist, who said that we did not know what happened in an “ignorance zone” prior to measurement. In other words, they used the spin measurement, which is much more subject to chance. John Bell subsequently established his theorem of inequality” that violates the quantum theory, but not the classical probability principle. In 1982, Alain Aspect conducted an experiment on protons and pho- tons. A vacuum chamber was used to inject calcium atoms excited by two lasers. The excitation emits photons, after which the atoms return to their fundamental state. It is extremely important to note that the quan- tum entanglement generates photons, rather than laser photons, after returning from this excited state! This return corresponds to a coordinate of the “present of 3D time.” Quantum mechanics cannot explain this sit- uation. Aspect found a value of 2.7, while it should have been lower than or equal to 2. The two photons had an additional polarization value, despite the fact that everything humanly possible was done to ensure that neither photon would have information about the other prior to and +o wala wead toad during measurement. So there were no hidden variables. However, how do these two photons communicate while traveling at light speed known as the final frontier? Can information turn back the hands of time? Another experiment conducted by Antoine Suarez took place in Geneva in the year 2000, using a very different principle of a half-silvered mirror, where each of the two photons could either pass or be reflected. They showed the same behavior each time. To ascertain whether or not information could turn back time the photons were shielded completely from the experimentation mechanisms. Could there be a “programmed” correlation (common cause in the past) or a “telephone” correlation (existence of a signal between the two)? Neither argument proved applicable under the strict condi- tions of the experiment. The explanation given was that the correla- tion occurred without any time passing. That is partially true as the Shedding new light on science 261